Xiao sloppily mistakenly sees 284 as 290, and gets 3 more quotients than correct quotients, what is

Validation: There are 3 more quotients in error than in correct.

Analysis: This question seems complicated, but if you think about it carefully, it is actually very simple, and it is dividend.

290 284=6) has 6 more, and the quotient has 3, then the original divisor is: 6 3=2, knowing that the divisor is 2, the original dividend is 284, and the original correct quotient is 284 2=142.

Look at the wrong quotient again: 290 2 = 145, the wrong quotient minus the correct quotient is, 145 142 = 3, which is in line with the topic.

So the normal quotient is 142.

Primary school math problems are not so complicated, but they just need to use more brains, think more, sort out logical relationships, and then solve problems.

The divisor is n and the correct quotient is x.

nx = 284

nx + 3n = 290

3n = 6

n = 2x = 284/2

290 is 6 more than 284, and the quotient is 3 more than the correct quotient, then the divisor is 6 3 2. This is the correct quotient 284 2 142.

Let the divisor be a and the wrong quotient is b

a×b=290---1)

a×(b-3)=284---2)

a=290/b=290/145=2

The correct quotient is: 284 a=142 (or 145-3=142).

195 is 159 and 36 is missing, and the calculated quotient is 6 less than the correct result, which proves that there are 6 divisors in 36, so that the divisor is 6. Since the divisor is 6, take 195 6 to get the correct quotient.

If the dividend is 195, it is wrong to read 159. That dividend, that is a decrease of 195-159 36The result is 6 less than the originalYour divisor is 36 6 6

divisor = 36 6 = 6

Correct result = 195 6=

Error result = 159 6=

When calculating, the little sloppy mistakes the dividend 195 as 159, and the calculated quotient is 6 less than the correct result, but?

divisor = 36 6 = 6

Correct result = 195 6=

The divisor 195 is written as 159, which is less.

If the dividend is less than 36, the quotient is less than 6, indicating that the divisor is.

What to ask for?

The correct answer is. The wrong answer is.

That's when the numbers are reversed. You can change it back.

195 159=36 divisor=36 6=6 Correct result=195 6= False result=159 6=

Share 1 dislike.

Assuming that the original number is x, then we can get the formula:

x/ - x/ =

x=correct quotient =

Meet the requirements: -= + 21 =

Calculated by a 10-fold reduction in quotient:

21 then the original number =

The dividend is reduced by 10 times, the divisor remains the same, and the quotient is reduced by 10 times.

Original quotient = divisor =

The dividend is reduced by 10 times, and the divisor remains unchanged, shouldn't the quotient be expanded by 10 times.

The divisor is (195-159) 6=6, and the correct quotient should be (195-3) 6=32

184 - 148 36, 36 2 18, divisor 18, so the correct quotient is 10.

The quotient is less than 2 means that the dividend has been miswritten after the smaller.

2 times the divisor is the amount that is written as small.

i.e. the divisor is (184-148) 2 = 18, the correct equation is 184 18, the quotient is 10 remainder 4, and the verification is 148 18= quotient 8 remainder 4

The remainder is exactly equal and the quotient is 2 smaller than the original

So the correct quotient is 10

The original Shang Shi dust leak: 1

Wrong business banquet rotten brother eggplant: 10

The correct quotient is:

A: The correct quotient is.

Mu 10

Because the dividend is increased by a factor of 10, the quotient of the empty defeat is also expanded by a factor of 10 at the same time.

The correct quotient for the quick loss liquid.

If the dividend is incorrectly written as 314, the dividend is enlarged by a factor of 10, and the quotient should also be enlarged by a factor of 10.

Let the correct quotient be x, 10x-x=

Solve the equation to get x=

The correct quotient is:

The difference from the quotient is obtained, and the divisor is: (

The correct quotient is:

The quotient is less than 2, which means that the difference between the dividend is 2 divisors.

The correct quotient is 10