What s the difference between rushing me and getting on me?

Give me and follow me, the difference between the meaning of these two sentences is very large, the former represents the meaning of a command tone is as a superior requirement, the subordinate must do something, which in many cases, for the subordinate, can only make passive obedience, but with me this represents, as a leader is more responsible, can encounter difficulties or dangers, take the lead, take the lead, often in this case, can stimulate a class of morale, and their subordinates are relatively speaking, It's also more energetic to work hard.

The meanings of these two sentences are fundamentally different. Because it is relatively slow to go up with me, usually calm and unhurried, not impatient, just ask you to follow others up, there is no sense of urgency, and there is no commanding tone. This sentence often appears in battle scenes, such as the commander giving the order to attack, it will grow a long line of soldiers waving pistols and saying, rush me, this is to face everyone to rush forward with the fastest speed and braver, this is for the needs of the battle and in order to buy time for victory.

Therefore, the meaning is different, and the use is also different.

When you switch to the workplace, you can feel the same way.

The boss said the difference between making money with me and making money for me.

Plus a sentence, one will be a success.

Follow me as a leader.

Give it to me, you will send it.

To rush me is to order the other person to rush forward first, and I may not be in front of the other person.

When you follow me, you rush to the front first, and ask the people behind you to follow.

Obviously, "follow me" can get more respect and admiration from others.

Give me a rush, with a commanding tone. Follow me, referring to him himself taking the lead in the front, and the people behind him cooperate.

Rush me is you on me, I don't go up, I rush with me, I go first, and you go up again

With me, the generals and soldiers rushed forward with the same hatred and hatred, and the representatives ordered the soldiers to rush forward, of course, it was very different.

This sentence has a big difference, don't be on me means to fight with me, and to give me up is to let others fight.

Usually decent people will shout to follow me.

And the villains will yell at me.

During the war years, Dr. Han joined me to let his team bravely rush forward with him.

Many years have passed since the revolution, and without the Communist Party of those years, there would be no new China today.

It's a great pleasure to know the difference between being with me.

Comrades, rush!

Analysis: Take the lead, take the lead in the front, and share weal and woe with your brothers.

Give it to me, brethren!

Analysis: Hide behind yourself and let the younger brothers go to death. He was high up and commanding.

The difference is: "Comrades, rush" The person who says this sentence regards anyone as a comrade like himself, while the person who says "Brothers, give it to me" is just a person who takes advantage of others (most of them are).

One for war, one for fighting.

Brothers are a small group, for their own interests, and comrades for the common goal of everyone

Difference 1:

The term "I want to reply" focuses on expressing a subjective desire;

The term "I need" focuses on the expression of objective requirements. This is similar to the distinction between want and need in English.

Difference 2: "I want" belongs to the spiritual level, and what I want can not be necessary;

"I need" is on the material level, what is needed is to meet the need, it is a necessity.

Difference 3: "I want" is generally to meet a psychological need, and wanting can contain needs;

I need it" is not available now, but I want to get it in my heart, such as losing my phone and needing to buy a new one.

Such as: wishes, ideals, etc., you can use wants; Food, clothing, housing, transportation, etc. can be described as needs.

1. The focus is different.

"I want" expresses a subjective desire;

I need" is an objective requirement.

2. There are differences in the things pursued.

3. The context of use is different.

I want to "apply more when subjective wishes cannot be fulfilled;

I need to "apply more when objective needs are not met."

4. The results are different when you get them.

I want" (e.g. water, air, food), dispensable;

I need "water, air, food" and I can't live without it.

5. The meaning of the expression is different.

"I want" expresses the desire of my heart, but maybe I don't need it at all;

I need" is an objective requirement that I really need to.

The word "want" focuses on expressing a subjective desire, while the word "need" focuses on expressing an objective request. This is similar to the distinction between want and need in English.

Depending on the context, both words may apply, or only one of them may apply. When subjective desires and objective requirements coincide, both apply. For example:

It's cold and I want to buy a pair of gloves to keep warm. "Want" focuses on expressing one's inner desires, while "need" focuses on expressing requirements caused by objective factors (cold weather). When subjective desires and objective requirements do not coincide, it is more appropriate to use one over the other.

For example: "I want to play video games." "Playing video games is usually not an objective requirement, but a subjective desire, so it is very inappropriate to use the word "need", only the word "want".

Another example: "You look tired and need some sleep." "What is expressed here is an objective request, although it is likely that the other party is too busy and subjectively does not voluntarily supplement sleep; And if you change it to "want", the meaning is completely opposite.

If you need it, you don't have it now, but you want to get it in your heart, for example, if you lose your mobile phone and need to buy a new mobile phone.

What you need is not necessarily what you want, but there is something practical in work or life, you want to have it, but it is not necessarily what you need.

What you want is not necessarily what you need, and what you need is not necessarily what you want. For example: I want a high-end sports car, but the right is that the high-end sports car is not necessary for me to lock, and without a high-end sports car, Chery QQ can also travel.

I need to study hard and work hard, but I don't want that. The two can be said to have no inevitable relationship, look at the point, as the saying goes, break the jar and break it, and often find that the world is so cheerful...

If you want to find a way to get it if you don't have it now, you need to be right away and can't wait.

You don't want to eat when you're hungry, but you have to!!

Want to belong to the fine.

At the level of the rejuvenation, the desire of the east and the west can not be a necessity, just to meet a need of the Du psychology, and the desire can contain the need; dao

Wishes, ideals, etc., can be used to want; Food, clothing, housing, transportation, etc. can be described as needs.

The above is a personal understanding, not necessarily correct, just for your reference

What you want is not necessarily what you need. I just want to get it, but I don't necessarily really need it.

1. Water, air, food.

2. Sports cars, villas, beauties.

1What you need, you can't live without it.

2 What you want, dispensable.

Literally, it seems that things are not yours, they are all used by others, the first one is more colloquial, the second is more written, this depends on where it is used, if it is authorized or contracted, it is better to be written and clear.

Personally, I don't advocate playing with words, if you feel that the expression is not clear, please change the words or add a few descriptive sentences at the end.

On behalf of the two (above) words, I will send you two sentences.

1. The owner of the floor should pay attention to the body.

2. May the landlord think about things.

Difference Between Verb and Noun.

Suitable for me means that the other party satisfies you, and feels that no matter in terms of appearance or conversation, as well as personality and temperament, the two people have a common topic together, they can talk very well, there is fate, and they are suitable partners for living together.

I am suitable for people who only know what kind of person they are, know their own shortcomings, and also feel what strengths or abilities they have, and the other partner I want to find needs to understand me clearly, be tolerant and considerate to me, and be able to satisfy my heart.

Difference Between Passive and Proactive.

For example, clothes, this dress is suitable for me, it means that the number of suitable clothes is limited, and you are more passive; And, I fit this dress, illustrated, you can have a variety of choices, and the clothes specified only for you.

Of course, the above is my personal fabrication.

Hahaha ( Send you a little flower.

It's as if I like and like me.

Differences: 1. Different meanings:

1. Suitable for the actual situation or objective requirements; The right person.

2. Conform to; Expedient; with an objective meaning.

2. Different citations and interpretations:

1. Appropriate hé shì

It is also "suitable", and it means: it is suitable.

Example: It's not appropriate to make a judgment about it now. High level of education, suitable for doing this job.

Source: Lao She's "Camel Xiangzi" VII: "Besides, the food and accommodation are suitable, the work is not tired, and it is not a loss to raise the body well." ”

Translation: Besides, food and shelter are appropriate, work is not tiring, and it is not a disadvantage to take care of your body.

2. Suitable for shì hé

Interpretation: suitable, compliant.

Example: This dress suits me perfectly.

Source: Spring and Autumn Period-Guiguzi-"Guiguzi Resentment": Where the convergence is reversed, the plan is suitable.

Translation: All exhortations to unite or confront will have a corresponding strategy.

Example: Highly educated, suitable for this job.

3. Different expressions:

Appropriate: To be an adjective, it is often said that something is appropriate or not. and the preceding subject to form a subject-verb structure. The object is not followed by the object.

Fit: Used more as a verb, often saying that something is suitable for another thing. It should be followed by an object.