What do you think of the phenomenon of liberal arts students being despised for?

As a science student, I don't feel that the liberal arts are easy to learn at all. It's just that liberal arts education at the middle school level really doesn't have any technical content, which gives people an illusion. Personally, I think that the learning threshold for liberal arts is actually very high.

Generally, the liberal arts students we despise are just the kind of 2B young people who are hypocritical, illogical, and blind BB, and have no scientific knowledge and do not know it. It has nothing to do with the liberal arts itself. By this standard, there are many who are worthy of contempt among science students.

Since the liberal arts are set up, it means that the development of society needs liberal arts, and the construction of the country also needs liberal arts. News without the contribution of liberal arts students? Literary works without the contribution of liberal arts students?

Historical preservation without the contribution of liberal arts students? Even various laws and regulations, translation, economics and finance, etc., liberal arts students contribute no less to society than science students, and we are also changing the world, without us, the world would not be able to change. Contempt stems from ignorance, we just know it ourselves, why do we have to change other people's minds, what can you do if you change it, what should you do if you don't?

Many students study liberal arts, not interest-oriented, but do not study science before they go to liberal arts. It is indisputable that science mathematics is objectively more difficult than liberal arts mathematics in the college entrance examination. On the other hand, many students choose science, not because they are not interested in liberal arts, nor because they can't study liberal arts, but because science is more conducive to widening the gap and grade of college entrance examination scores.

Those who have taken the college entrance examination know that science students can apply for most liberal arts majors, but on the contrary, many science majors and liberal arts students cannot apply for the examination. As a result, many college students who seem to be liberal arts students are actually science students in high school.

Don't despise liberal arts students, only despise science students. I worship the god of liberal arts. However, if you study liberal arts in high school because you can't study science well, instead of hobbies, such people often don't study liberal arts well.

The phenomenon of liberal arts being divorced from reality. In fact, China's humanities and social sciences have just completed the stage of "introducing foreign achievements" not long ago. In fact, the introduction of overseas results is mainly focused on the introduction of mainstream theories from the United States, and there is a lack of diversification.

Moreover, this kind of "introduction" is relatively impetuous, and without an in-depth contextual interpretation of the theory itself, it is simply introduced and applied to China; Ignoring both the history of theory and the history of China has caused the problem of "double de-historicization" criticized by Mr. Sun Ge.

I think it's very incorrect to draw conclusions without studying liberal arts, just like a bunch of keyboard warriors discussing hypocrisy in people with depression, this thing doesn't empathize, how can it be generalized? What's more, the difficulty of history, geography and politics before the division of subjects can not be compared with the difficulty of history geography and politics after the division of subjects, I studied politics during the examination, that is, the one of idealistic materialism, and the whole person was in a state of confusion during class, and I was not bad, but if I wanted to study literature, I might not be able to get the same results.

It is undeniable that many students do study literature because they can't study science well. It is not easy to get a high score in liberal arts, but for ordinary students, it is indeed easier to get points in liberal arts than in science. Therefore, students with various arts and sports specialties also generally choose liberal arts.

There are few college majors to choose from in the liberal arts, and most of them are not easy to find in the future. Under the market economy, employment and income are the most direct evaluations of a person.

If we say that the New Culture Movement is classified as "literature", there should be no problem, but the slogans of the New Culture Movement are "democracy" and "science", and only with open-mindedness and the combination of science and culture can we promote the progress of the times. The combination of literature and science is indispensable for the integrity of society. The "reason" in behavior and the contempt for "literature" are all naïve and immature autistic ideas.

This concept is closely related to China's national conditions and economic and social development, and you can only accept what you can't change.

You don't need to change other people's minds, all you need is to change yourself. Gold shines in **. You have made up your mind to work hard and become a person with excellent grades, who will despise you in terms of grades? Who would dare to despise you? This is the most important thing.

Science is the work, and the liberal arts leaders are the work.

The level of liberal arts students in my country is indeed low, and this must be admitted. Most of the top students devote themselves to science. Only a small number of students study liberal arts out of interest, and most of them can't continue to study science. So it also leads people to look down on liberal arts students.

However, this does not mean that the humanities and social sciences are inferior to science and engineering, and the roles played by the two are different. Historical, economic, psychological, legal, social, literary ......Anyone with a little bit of perception and a little bit of talent will always have reverence for these things. The relations of production are no less important than the productive forces.

There is also the fact that the threshold for liberal arts is too low, and anyone can come in and insert a foot. A bunch of ...... who don't even know what the bare minimum liberal arts studies entailIf you really subvert the three views, can't you be humble about what you don't understand? No matter how bad it is, keep silent, okay?

Give you the textbook for the comprehensive examination paper, let you open the book for the exam, and I will see if you can pass the multiple-choice questions of the comprehensive examination. In the past, the study of history was indeed extremely backward, but in recent years, the requirements for subject literacy in history have increased a lot. Not to mention geography, you can take a geography test paper and feel it yourself, and you can read a book.

I won't give you a political test paper, for fear of hurting your self-esteem.

In the patriarchal environment in China, liberal arts generally give people the feeling that they only need rote memorization, easy to learn but not easy to get high scores, little room for growth, and it is difficult to find a job after graduation, and there are fewer jobs. Science is different, science requires a lot of thinking and calculation, and it is easy to find a job after graduation, and the salary is high.

Liberal arts students are not looked down upon, and no one will ever look down on liberal arts students, these are just some personal thoughts and speculations.

Liberal arts students are also other people's own choices, as long as they choose, there is no good, bad, right or wrong, they are all trying to make themselves better people.

It may be that there are not many majors for liberal arts students to choose from, which will cause a feeling of being looked down upon.

I think a lot of people think that liberal arts students are studying for the rest of their lives. It's not very applicable to real life, but in fact, liberal arts students are also very good.

The main reason for the misery of liberal arts students is that after the reform of the new college entrance examination, there are relatively few candidates who choose liberal arts subjects to apply for majors. The "hegemon" status of physics in the reform of the college entrance examination makes it seem that there are fewer liberal arts students. In fact, it is not that there are fewer and fewer liberal arts students, but that there are more and more well-rounded students, and the choices for choosing science will be more diverse in the future, and more people will prefer to study science.

Why is it said that liberal arts and sciences are not divided into disciplines, and liberal arts students are miserable The "hegemon" status of physics in the college entrance examination reform makes it seem that there are fewer liberal arts students. In fact, it is not that there are fewer and fewer liberal arts students, but that there are more and more well-rounded students, and the choices for choosing science will be more diverse in the future, and more people will prefer to study science. For example, the number of single-limit physics majors such as Tsinghua University, Zhejiang University, and Shanghai Jiaotong is more than 80%, and more students choose more in order to take the university entrance examination, and they are more inclined to "learn mathematics, physics and chemistry well, and they are not afraid to go all over the world".

After the reform of the college entrance examination, in addition to increasing the number of subjects, the mathematics of the college entrance examination is no longer divided into two categories: arts and sciences; And mathematics will become a unified college entrance examination subject for everyone, and the number of references will also be greatly improved, and its importance is self-evident. Therefore, students who are not good at math will suffer more when they take the new college entrance examination. How do liberal arts students deal with the new college entrance examination subject selection model that does not separate arts and sciences Liberal arts students try to counterattack in the first year of high school Which stage of high school, the easiest time to counterattack, is actually the first year of high school, this time point is just over the high school entrance examination, and there are still three years before the college entrance examination.

Many students, including parents, will subconsciously relax, and at this time, they can wake up and start to study with all their might, and the improvement of grades is the most obvious, and with the continuous improvement of grades, students will become more and more accomplished, even if parents do not supervise, grades will generally not fall, because the sense of achievement of improving grades will force children to continue to work hard. The knowledge points of high school are twice that of junior high school, and when the child knows that it is definitely too late to work hard in the third year of high school, so if you want to counterattack in the college entrance examination, you must go all out from the beginning of high school if you want to ensure a continuous lead. In the college entrance examination, liberal arts students should choose the subjects they are interested in.

The second is to choose subjects with advantages and great development potential. Third, it is necessary to consider the majors and even occupations that we want to apply for in the future, and select the subjects in a targeted manner. Since students choose their own course combinations, many universities have requirements for choosing courses when they apply for the examination.

For example, if some students want to study psychology and want to choose the psychology major of South China Normal University, they must also choose the course of physics, so as to meet the rigid application requirements of the major.

There is no need to refute, real self-confidence comes from the depths of one's own heart, not by refuting others, people who really feel that the liberal arts are useful do not need to prove to others that the liberal arts are useful, and there are always some "people who pretend to be asleep" in this world who can't wake up, so there is no need.

Silence is the best rebuttal, I am also a liberal arts student, I think the majority of liberal arts students don't have to care too much about these ridiculous words, study quietly, the future of liberal arts students is also bright, as for those who can't learn science well and despise liberal arts students by claiming to be science students, just roll their eyes in their hearts and ignore it.

Your excellence is the best response to this, encouragement

There are no liberal arts. In modern history, we will not wake up and unite to fight against foreign enemies (for example, Lu Xun's published article just confirms this) Without liberal arts, we will not find that the original environment is in great problems ("Silent Spring") Without liberal arts, we cannot feel the beauty around us. Without liberal arts, we would not live a better life and be more able to figure out people's hearts.

Without liberal arts, we can't expand the breadth of life. Without liberal arts, we wouldn't have those who are politically talented. And many, many more.

An important point in liberal arts is to enlighten the mind, such as the Renaissance, such as the May Fourth Movement, if only science and technology are developed, and hundreds of millions of people in China are not united, what is the use of science and technology development.

There is no need to refute, I think that people's values are not at the same level, just like you can't tell a person who only sees money in his eyes the importance of spirituality, the science students who study well around me respect the liberal arts and the humanistic spirit, and think that the people who think that the liberal arts are useless are just their own spiritual level is not enough.

Liberal arts students are useful, but there may be *** if there are more liberal arts students.

There is a "meteor shower" on the line, but there are people in China who "go to see the meteor shower together".

Let's watch the meteor shower again".

Let's also watch meteor showers together".

No one accompanied me to watch the meteor shower".

I want to accompany you to watch the meteor shower".

That's extremely boring.

Every great revolution in the humanities will inevitably set off a social change or the rapid progress of science and technology, almost all the great progress in human history is preceded by a great emancipation of the mind and humanities, so the revolution is to change people's minds first and then set off armed struggle or coup d'état, and the liberal arts students are of great significance to the progress of the humanities. The Westernization Movement also proved that ideology is the root of a country's strength, and artifacts are only leaves, and if there are no roots, leaves will naturally not live long.

Shut up and get the facts. If there weren't so many things in life that were deeply related to science, science students wouldn't be so confident. Liberal arts students should think about what they can do, China's current cultural soft power is not strong, put in a little effort, come up with some results, and naturally liberal arts students will have enough confidence.

The foundation of a country is that the people in this country have a sense of responsibility for the country, not that she is good I love it, and if it is not good, I don't love it, it should be the road to the rise of the dedication, after the rise do not forget the original intention, consistently. What liberal arts students can do is get this idea to spread and sink into people's hearts.

Liberal arts is not what people usually call rote memorization, to be able to get high scores, but also need us to have very strong logical thinking ability, and now people pay more and more attention to spiritual issues, there are many majors in liberal arts, such as philosophy is a study of these metaphysical things.

It's not the theory of the uselessness of liberal arts, it's the theory of the uselessness of liberal arts students. After all, science students of a certain grade are both liberal arts and sciences.

Mainly liberal arts students, bar ......Only those who have become talented are useful, and there are still few who have become talented. Skills in science and engineering are needed in the development of science and engineering, regardless of direction and level, and there is a market basis (

People who have not seen the three-body problem will not have such a feeling. The tragic death of Ye Wenjie's father, the ignorant masses, the backward environment of the times, the development of science and technology is in the hands of a small number of scientific and technological workers, and the uneducated masses are lagging behind science and technology. What is the use of liberal arts, a philosopher once said that the contradiction between scientific development and human development needs to be bridged by humanistic workers, human feelings, ethics and morality need to keep up with the times, and science and technology need to adapt to human beings.

Before the destruction of the earth, human beings sent the crystallization of culture to outer space, which shows the importance of humanities, and like science, it is another side of human beings, another proof of existence. So what's the use of studying liberal arts? Before the new technology and human contradictions arrive, science people will continue to laugh and complain.