Thor is so powerful in Marvel, why are Captain America and Iron Man the leaders?

Although Marvel is very powerful, Thor's mind lacks a certain amount of stability, and he is easy to be rash and can't deal with it calmly. And the American team and Iron Man have a strong ideological consciousness.

Although Thor is very strong, but after all, it is a mythical character, coupled with the influence of atheism for several years, everyone's worship of Thor is like worshipping star idols, Thor 3 can be seen, and the American team + Tony is different, they are real human beings, controllable, the most important point is that the American team is the spiritual leader, Tony is the nominal leader in the Avengers, the two are inseparable, the American team is close to the people, so it is respected by Wanda + Falcon + Hawkeye and others, and Tony is real, After all, he is not a member of the American team generation, although both of them are leaders, but they have different opinions with each other, which can be seen in the movie.

Because both of these have good leadership and organizational skills, Thor is strong but weak in these aspects.

Leaders must not only be strong, but also have excellent leadership skills and charisma, which these Thors do not have.

Because Thor is not an American, he can only be a thug for **.

To be precise, Iron Man can represent humanity! The rest of the superheroes are either not earthlings or are produced in an extremely harsh environment that is difficult to replicate, and only Iron Man is a product of the development of human technology.

The "Thor" movie is not as good as "Iron Man" and "Captain America" for many reasons.

Donnie was born with a proud appearance, and with the character setting of Iron Man, the perfect fit is impeccable; And Evans, after experiencing the role setting of Captain America, also fully demonstrated his advantages in appearance and body shape, which can be called the first in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. In comparison, Hemsworth actually looks like the big boy next door, and is a little rough. It's not angular, it's not delicate, it's not very distinctive.

Moreover, although he is also muscular, his overall appearance actually looks a little chubby......

So in this regard, Hemsworth didn't give much of a bonus to the role of Thor.

In terms of the overall shape, Thor throwing a cloak and carrying a hammer really makes people feel average, and even a bit of middle two, which is difficult to make the audience feel bright. In contrast, the coolness shown by Iron Man's super high-tech has amazed almost all audiences, and in the end, it has made the audience who has watched Iron Man continue to dislike the equipment in other movies of the same type.

Although it is superficial in the eyes of comic fans, this is the real influence of movie characters in the general audience. And the back of Captain America with a shield and a huge responsibility is both admirable and distressing, full of emotional resonance.

Norse mythology has a relatively small audience, and there are fewer people who have really studied it in depth, so both the story background and the characters give people a sense of distance. Although the Thor series is said to be an event that takes place in a larger pattern than the earth, the plot perspective is actually quite average, especially the first part. Many viewers were actually very puzzling when they watched the first part, thinking that this was simply Loki's prank made into a **.

In comparison, Captain America and Iron Man add up to five plays (Captain America 3 is not counted), there are wars, espionage, betrayal, creation, terrorist organizations, Frankenstein, and the plot is very rich.

The plot is weak, and the origin movies are not easy to make.

Because the attention of Thor's movie is not particularly high, and the influence is not particularly extensive, the evaluation is not particularly good.

is caused by aesthetic fatigue, there are too many dramas of this type, and people are not willing to continue**.

Mainly because Iron Man and Captain America are both childhood dreams of ours, and these two shows are very important to all of us, so they must be much better than Thor.

In the Marvel movies, the original six Avengers were Iron Man, Captain America, Black Widow, Hulk, Hawkeye and Thor. Of the six of them, Iron Man Tony relied on his brilliant mind and armor; Captain America is far stronger than ordinary people because he has been injected with super serum; Hawkeye has an unrivaled archery skill; Black Widow's assassination, espionage intelligence, etc. are top-notch; The Hulk was able to transform into a powerful Hulk battle because of gamma ray radiation; Thor is the prince of Asgard and has great fighting power.

Among the six of them, it can be said that Thor should be in the top three in terms of combat effectiveness, but after the establishment of the Avengers, in our opinion, Thor did not become the leader of the Avengers, it should be said that Captain America and Iron Man are leading the Avengers. Thor is so powerful, why didn't he become the leader of the Avengers?

In fact, to become a leader, it is not enough to be strong, and many other conditions are required.

Thor was not originally from Earth, he was the prince of Asgard, and he joined the Avengers because he had a good affection for Earth and that his girlfriend Jane and many friends were on Earth. This is destined for Thor's consideration of the problem, more from the interests of Asgard than from the perspective of the earth, like the disposal of the cosmic scepter.

Since Thor can't consider the problem from the perspective of the earth, he naturally can't be the leader of the Avengers, because the Avengers were established to protect the earth.

Thor stays in Asgard all year round.

Thor is the prince of Asgard and is a member of Asgard. Naturally, Thor's most frequent place is naturally his hometown of Asgard, and the Avengers are to protect the earth, in this case, if Thor is the leader, if there is a problem, will Thor come to remote control? It's better to be like now, the earth is in danger, and Thor can quickly go to the earth to help defend against foreign enemies.

Thor's personality traits are not quite suitable.

In Thor's first movie, Thor was banished to Earth by Odin as a prisoner because of his arrogant and belligerent character, although Thor got much better after that, but Thor is still a straightforward and easily angry person. And in the Avengers, there is an existence like Iron Man who is almost unconvincing, and Thor may fight within a few minutes when he is the leader.

To sum up: Thor is so powerful in Marvel, why not be the leader of the "Avengers"?

Thor is an Asgardian and will be biased towards Asgard when it comes to thinking about things.

Thor has been in Asgard all year round and is not fit to be a leader.

Thor's personality traits are not suitable to be the leader of the Avengers.

The leadership of an organization requires all aspects of ability, smart minds, outstanding leadership and excellent strength, and Raytheon is still somewhat lacking in organizational leadership.

It's because Thor is not an earthling, and Thor's personality is more freedom-loving, so he can't be a leader.

Despite Thor's strength, he doesn't have good leadership skills to unite people and be the leader of the Avengers.