-
A is a sufficient and necessary condition for an orthogonal matrix is aa'=e.
Take the determinant on both sides to get |a||a'| = |e|.
a'It is a transpose of A. e is the identity matrix.
So |a'| = |a|, e|= 1 so |a|^2 = 1.
When|a|= -1.
a+e| = |a+aa'| = |a(e+a')| = |a||e+a'| = |a||(e+a)'| = -|e+a|.
So |a+e| = 0.
So -1 is a eigenvalue of a.
When|a|= 1 and a is of odd order, a-e| = |a-aa'| = |a(e-a')| = |a||e-a'| = |(e-a)'| = |e-a|
a-e)| = (-1)^n|a-e| = -|a-e|.
So |a-e| = 0.
So -1 is a eigenvalue of a.
Satisfied
-
1)ab+a+b=e
Add the identity matrix e on both sides at the same time
ab+a+b+e=2e
b+e)(a+e)=2e
b+e)[(a+e)/2]=e
Therefore, b+e is an invertible matrix.
2) From (1) it is known that (b+e)[(a+e) 2]=e, so the inverse matrix of b+e is (a+e) 2
-
Uniqueness:
If there are two forms.
i.e. a = b + c b symmetrical c antisymmetric.
a = f + g f symmetrical g antisymmetric.
So there's a'Represents a transpose.
a' = b' + c' = b - c
a' = f' + g' = f - g
From f + g = b + c
f - g = b - c
The addition of the two formulas gives 2f=2b, f=b
Further we get g = c
So it was proven.
-
Proof: Take x= i=(0,..1,..0) t, the i-th component is 1, and the other components are 0
It is known that x tax = aii = 0, i=1,2 ,..n.
Take x= ij=(0,..1,..1,..0) t, the ith and jth components are 1, and the other components are 0
It is known that x tax = 2aij = 0, i,j=1,2 ,..n, i≠j.
In summary, aij = 0, i,j=1,2,..n is a = 0
-
1.Because if both a and b are nth-order orthogonal matrices.
So aa' =a'a = e, bb'Deficit blouse = b'b = e, so (ab).'(ab) =b'a'ab = b'b = e so ab is an orthogonal matrix.
2.Because (a+a')'a'+(a')'a' +a = a+a'
So aa'The pin cavity is a symmetrical matrix.
Because (a+a')'Stuffiness = a'-(a')'a' -a = a+a' )
So aa'is an antisymmetric matrix.
Why is it necessary to have the same eigenvalue as a to be similar to a?" >>>More
Intercept af=ad on ab and connect fe because ae bisects dab so fae is equal to angular fad. >>>More
If the function f(x) satisfies f(x1+x2)=f(x1)·f(x2),(x r)and it is known that f(x) is a monotonic function on r. >>>More
Using the integral median theorem: 0qmqux e (t 178;) dt = x * e^(ξ178;) is between 0 and x. = x * e^( x²), where 0,1 when t gt; At 0, let f(t) e (t 178;) f '(t) =2t e^(t²) gt;", f(t) is strictly single-incremented, so that in the above equation is the only 1 47;x²) ln【∫ 0,x] e^(t²) dt / x】 lim(x->+∞lim(x->+∞1/x²) ln【∫ 0,x] e^(t²) dt / x】= lim(x->+∞1/x²) ln( ∫0koswx] e^(t²) dt ) ln x 】=lim(x->+∞e^(x²) 47; ∫0,x] e^(t²) dt - 1/x 】&47;(2x) Lopida's law lim(x gt; +∞x e^(x²) 0,x] e^(t²) dt 】&47; (2 x² ∫0,x] e^(t²) dt )=lim(x->+∞2 x² e^(x²) 47; 【2 x² e^(x²) 4 x ∫ 040x] e^(t²) dt 】=62c。 >>>More
Venn diagrams can be used to help analyze the meaning of the topic and clarify ideas; But take it as a proof process. There is a suspicion of lack of rigor. Below I give the algebraic proof process. >>>More