Is fast or slow a comparison or a contrast?

Fast and slow mainly refers to the comparison of the length and speed of a certain period of time, so it should be a comparison. Comparison is a vague generalization of the comparison between a specific thing and a specific thing in less time or the speed of the comparison, not the accurate calculation of speed, usually a single comparison of a specific thing or a certain thing, is a point of time and speed expression, and comparison usually requires the comparison results of more than two specific things or things.

It's contrast, fast and slow are both relative, faster or slower than what.

Of course, speed is a contrast, because only with a person or substance can you compare whether something is fast or slow. So something like fast and slow is a comparison, not an ordinary comparison.

It is a comparison, it is a comparison between speeds, and it will be compared by the speed of matter, and there is a position of contrast, which can be seen at once between static and dynamic, which is the magnitude comparison of matter.

Of course, fast and slow are contrasts, because they are a very sharp contrast, fast is described as fast, slow is particularly slow, they have a gap.

It should be a contrast

Comparison means comparing several things of the same kind.

Contrast is to put two opposite, opposite things or two opposite and opposite aspects of the same thing together, and use the method of comparison to describe or explain, this kind of writing technique is called contrast, also called contrast.

Fast and slow are two words with different meanings, they are a pair of antonyms, which is a comparison and a contrast.

No, the speed of motion is to compare the magnitude of the speed, and there are two ways to compare the speed of two moving objects: compare the distance of action in the same time, the longer the distance, the greater the speed Compare the time in the same distance, and the shorter the use time, the greater the speed.

Fast and slow are relative, which means that there is no difference between fast and slow without comparison.

So it's the result of the comparison.

It's a contrast, the speed of one object is the contrast with another object.

Is fast or slow a comparison or a contrast? I think it's still a contrast.

Fast and slow as an adjective is contrast, i.e., antonym. As a verb is to compare!

In the past two days, my thinking has improved a lot, about how fast and slow I do things, and about how good and bad things are.

The so-called "fast and slow" rhetoric is nothing more than complaining.

Regarding the fast and slow of doing things, I originally wanted to say that "slow is fast", and suddenly found that doing things does not have to distinguish between slow and fast, in reality anything can happen, what can be done is to keep adjusting the turn, the reality cannot be that I want to be slow, I want to be fast. Since the situation in reality is unknowable, why use rigid thinking to complain and shake the wit, it must be in a certain state, right? Is it the ideal state?

Does it have to be "slow is fast"? The answer to all of the above is no. It is more necessary to have a mentality of "who else should I be", and calmly face the various combinations of slow and fast and slow and fast.

The good and the bad of things just don't distinguish between boundaries.

It doesn't matter if things are good or bad, there are just the good and bad meanings that we ourselves give to them.

Today is a bit of a roll, there is no point in the quality of things, keep it and then slowly make up for it!

Do you distinguish between fast and slow when you do things? When something happens, you ask if it's a good thing or a bad thing?