Which one is better?

Oh, Japan's electronics are relatively strong, remove a first, to be honest, if there is an option for Kodak, it is recommended that you choose him. Because if you look at it from an imaging point of view, Kodak is more professional. His lenses and constructions are time-tested.

Fashion-wise, Sony is a bit better. If you buy a DV, you can consider Sony and Panasonic. As for the Canon ...

It's hard to say, after all, I haven't used it specifically, but I have only experienced it in the store.

In terms of cost performance, it is definitely Oba's.

If you don't care**, these canons are better.

Canon's bar, I'm using it myself, and it feels good.

Canon is recommended, the lens and sensor are good.

It depends on whether you are doing ordinary use or professional photography, professional photography generally uses SLR, but the price is expensive, a lens costs thousands, ordinary cameras are more affordable, the current imaging is better, and the camera is generally seen.

1.Pixels: The higher the pixels, the more detailed the image.

2.Zoom: The larger the variable focal length, the clearer the distant scene will be (there are also digital zoom and optical zoom, with optical zoom being the best).

3.Lens: Lenses are generally divided into CMOS and CCD, CCD is better than CMOS, the imaging is more delicate, and the lens is also divided into brands, such as some of the more famous Carl Zeiss lenses, Leica lenses, Schneider lenses, these three are the best.

4.Light sensitivity: The higher the sensitivity, the better the camera will shoot in dark or cloudy days.

5.Manual mode: A camera with more manual modes is a good thing, and those with more automatic modes are usually point-and-shoot machines, which can be known from the price, and there are thousands of differences.

The price-performance ratio is the result of a comprehensive comparison.

First of all, look at the sensor size, the sensor size directly determines the camera grade, the larger the grade, the higher the grade, if there is a camera sensor size larger than the same price model, then the cost performance is high, but only look at the cost performance is not right, no one will buy a product just because of the cost performance, the cost-effective camera is not necessarily the camera that can meet your needs, so it is best to consider your budget and needs first, and then choose the most suitable model for you according to the budget and needs, In this way, the selected camera will be satisfied with itself.

The cheapest is the most cost-effective, a few hundred yuan can also do what a digital camera should do, and the actual effect will not be as bad as people think compared with a digital camera of several thousand yuan.

Ordinary digital cameras mainly look at the sensor size and aperture size and pixels, the larger the sensor, the better, the smaller the aperture f-value, the better, and the higher the pixels, the worse. Because the sensor of ordinary digital cameras is basically 1 inch, this sensor 10 million pixels is enough, the pixel is high, not only can not make **clearer**, but makes the **noise more serious, if it reaches more than 16 million pixels, as long as you take pictures in a relatively dim environment, there will be extremely obvious noise, if you magnify these ** to more than 100% on the computer, it will give you the feeling of serious mildew**.

Sony is good! But don't shop online?