What are the common characteristics of bad movies, and how to quickly and effectively identify bad m

What are the common characteristics of bad movies, and how to quickly and effectively identify bad movies?

Feature 1: Starring many big names.

For example, chestnuts: "Legend of the Gods", "Jue Ji", "The Ferryman".

This kind of thing is simply an accurate preview of bad movies - taking Guo Jingming's "Jue Ji", "Little Times" series and the 2016 super bad movie representative "Legend of the Gods" as examples, this kind of film is probably wishful thinking - so many leading actors always have a large-scale net that can attract you (buy tickets), to use the fame of the leading actors as a box office guarantee, and even more so, shrewd Guo Jingming even invented the "Fan Contribution Ranking" to bring things to the bright side. As everyone knows, it is actually counterproductive - the relationship between the characters is too confusing, and the main line description is not clear......The disastrous consequences of starring too many people far outweigh the benefits.

Feature 2: Crazy hype on the eve of release.

Take a chestnut: "Villain Angel", "Little Times".

When "Villain Angel" was released, Brother Chao really did his best to promote, but I have to say that the effect was half the effort, and it was so annoying that I was going to turn black. But after watching it, I understand the reason why Brother Chao is working hard to promote - in fact, a good movie can naturally win the box office by word of mouth in the later stage. Which ** were wildly promoted before the release, be careful.

Feature 3: A "customized" film dressed in a festive file.

Take a chestnut: "Together", "Happy Events in the Flower Field".

I don't know what year it was Valentine's Day, when I was still an ignorant child... I took my boyfriend to watch Donnie Yen, AB, and Ke Zhendong, who was still popular at the time, "Together", and I felt that my boyfriend was going to break up with me (indifferent face) after seeing half of it. In recent years, there have been more and more movies customized for Valentine's Day, Chinese New Year and other festivals, but it is not difficult for us to find that there are very few word-of-mouth box office win-win films.

Feature 4: "Peripheral" products of popular variety shows.

Take a chestnut: "Run, Brother", "Where Are You Going, Dad".

Exists only for the circle of money.

The whole process was indifferent and did not want to evaluate.

After watching one, you will probably stay away from this kind of film.

The first step is to look at the score and open the Douban score, although there is a water army, but bad movies can't be made up for by many water armies.

Douban film reviews are a relatively neutral existence, and the Douban boss has also said that he will never let the Douban movie score lose the way he should be because of money.

And the aesthetic direction of the public is basically the same. Looking at five short reviews, you can generally have a number in your heart.

casually took a screenshot of a film review of a current hot movie, and the rankings were all one star, and the number of likes was terrifying.

At this point, you can definitely judge what kind of work this is.

The distribution of Douban scores cannot be wrong.

An "L" shaped like the one above must be a peerless bad movie, and it is a movie that can't be brushed by no matter how many water armies you use.

The second step is to look at the focus of the movie poster.

Here is a quote from Zhihu, it feels too apt.

The poster of a general movie in general is:

Title: > Director> Starring> Producer or Producer, etc.

The director's more famous movie poster is:

Director: >, Title: > Starring: > Producer or Producer, etc.

The movie poster to highlight a certain starring actor is:

Starring> Title> Director> Producer or Producer, etc.

It's really too bad, and the director's movie poster is not famous is:

Producer or Executive Producer > Title > Starring > Director.

The above is the proportion of character size on the poster, welcome to take a seat.

Take a seat, I'm not targeting you, because of you, "Passing by Your World" has refreshed the lower limit of my bad movies.

3.Look at the director.

Movies directed by Spielberg, Cheng Er, Ang Lee, Jiang Wen and others, don't worry about buying tickets boldly.

However, Guo, Zhang Jiajia and others, you have to be careful, after all, the movie is for people to watch, and it takes people two hours to watch him, what can you present to the audience in these two hours? So, it's not like you're quite good at being a director, and it's not like you can make movies by writing books that trick some people.

Take a pit and add it when I find a better way later.

I think we should add one more that I summarized myself.

That is: the director is the starring actor and the director is not well-known, and the hype is more careful.

Another example is the great cause of xx, there are also problems such as story confusion, but it is only because of some well-known reasons that cannot be said that no one dares to criticize.

The audience is not stupid, they have their own thoughts, otherwise there will be no high and low box office. Even if some of the ** level is not enough, think about it People have spent time and money, more than you knock on the keyboard, type a few words always pay more thanks, be more tolerant.

1. A good film should have a clear story line and a logical plot.

The story line is clear and the plot is logical, which should have been the most basic element of a movie, but in recent years, there has been an increasing number of bad movies, so if you can sort out the story line, you can be considered a good film.

2. The personality of the character is outstanding.

Movie is a kind of art, ** to life but higher than life, the people in the movie are the same, similar to the people in reality, but a certain feature is obvious.

In bad movies, the characters of the socks are very unstable, either they are perfect characters, common male protagonists in idol dramas, or they struggle in their hearts, and then they completely change into a person.

Video reviews. A film that is popular among the Viewers will be slammed by critics, while a film that is usually rated as mediocre may gain popularity later. Different perspectives and opposing ideas exist in their own balance, with Rotten Tomatoes ratings, youtube**, or the New York Times.

Movies, as a form of entertainment, are easy to consume lightly. The entire theater may be packed with moviegoers watching the same movie, but as much as they may have very different ideas, their brain activity at the cellular level will remain the same as long as they are watching the same movie.

The definition of bad movies is as follows:

1. The plot is plagiarized, and the performance effect is not as good as the original one, which is a bad movie.

2. Kitsch, design more than sensitive factors belong to bad movies.

3. The actors' acting skills are too clumsy, and there are many cutout effects that are bad movies.

4. **The overall effect is second-rate, and the whole**boring plot is too much of a bad movie.

5, the playwright's answer is mediocre, there is nothing eye-catching, and the plot is inconsistent and inconsistent.

For example, if you watch a movie and you don't feel rewarded, it's a bad movie.

Some ** have connotations, you can see it, they are good movies, such as three fools making trouble in Bollywood.

Some** pure visual and auditory enjoyment, such as Transformers, although the connotation is relatively small, but you also get enjoyment, that is a good film.

Some ** you can't understand at all, but you always have a feeling that it's cool, and that's also a good movie.

Some **You understand, but you feel bored, it's still a bad movie.

Overall, it's good or bad depending on whether or not you're getting something out of it.

People who watch don't know what to say.,Speechless.。。

There is no plot, I don't know what to do, and it's a waste of time.

The actor's acting skills are terrible.

The director sucks. The camera is terrible. The set sucks.

To judge whether a movie is a bad movie, it depends on the film's plot setting and development, whether the setting background and content are distorted and too cliché, and whether the plot development is too bloody and dilapidated.

Movies are also called films

It is a modern technology and art developed by the combination of activity photography and slide projection. It is a comprehensive art that can accommodate a variety of arts such as literature and drama, photography, painting, dance, writing, sculpture, image, architecture, etc., but it also has unique artistic characteristics. In terms of artistic expression, film not only has the characteristics of various other arts, but also has the means of expression that surpasses all other arts because it can use montage, which is a highly artistic film assembly technique, and can also be copied and screened in large quantities, and can also disseminate some social entertainment theories and some undesirable social phenomena through films.

It can also allow us to learn knowledge, learn history and culture. Movies are also a way of information dissemination, through watching movies, you can learn about relevant history, customs or related knowledge.

Characteristics of bad movies

1. The actor group is crazy and has poor acting skills. 2. The rhythm of the story jumps out and the narrative is chaotic. 3. You can't have any degree of recognition for the plot, so much so that you forget it when you see it.

4. The most important thing is that the film can't have emotional resonance with you, it can neither move you nor amuse you, but just constantly disgust you and probe your bottom line of acceptance, which is the characteristic of a bad movie.

In general

Many domestic movies, including Hong Kong, are taking care of the public, deliberately arranging ill-conceived plots, which is a pure entertainment behavior, and if we are not smart enough, we will consider such movies as bad movies. And an excellent movie, the main plot is carefully planned, all the shots are targeted, and after watching it, people are shocked in the depths of their hearts, even if it is only a small part, but it is enough to go deep. "A Farewell" is a movie that shocks people's hearts, there is no plot, and your eyes will be red after watching it.

The most important thing is that a good movie will not drastically reduce the level of understanding in order to take care of the so-called level of public understanding, "Inception" is difficult to understand but definitely not as incomprehensible as "Wu Ji". "Wuji" is simply insulting the audience's IQ. Recently, the more obvious contrast is Chen Kexin's "Chinese Partner" and David Fincher's "Social Network" the year before last, the latter is the top level in Hollywood, the two lawsuits plus the scenes of the statement are mixed and edited, the pace is very fast, and you can't understand it if you are not careful, and then watch "Chinese Partner", it is not a bad movie, but this is obviously making a movie in a way of making soap operas.

Interestingly, there is also a litigation scene in it, and Director Chen's handling of this scene is obviously very shocking. Needless to say, anyone who has seen it carefully knows it. Some people retort that as long as the movie makes everyone happy after watching it, I think it's okay.

That's true, but it's nothing to do with discussing bad movies.

Summary

In fact, everyone's opinion on movies is also different, and their personal tastes are also different, right?

Movie scenes, scenes that are too rough show that they don't care.

Movie special effects, as the saying goes, five-cent special effects.

The plot of the movie is not attractive enough without logic.

The dialogue of the movie, the dialogue is too superficial, or too uncultured, and it will not attract the theme of the movie, and the unclear theme is also the criterion for judging the quality of the movie.

Everyone has a different opinion, and there are a thousand Hamlets for a thousand people. If you don't like it yourself, it's a bad movie.