Canon EF 50mm f 1 8 II Standard Prime Lens Classic How about a small spittoon.

If it's an amateur photographer, as long as the lens is in line with your financial strength, you can get it.

There is no absolute good or bad in the lens itself. It's all up to you.

If you shoot landscapes, then this shot is a little worse, because the wide angle is not enough; If you shoot a news documentary, it's a bit worse because the zoom is not enough. But if you're only using it for indoor portrait shooting, that's fine.

In appearance, the whole lens gives people a small, plastic feeling, cheap is the advantage of this head, the maximum aperture, poor imaging efficiency, the recommended aperture, the imaging is up, the workmanship is very general, and there are friends whose lenses fall apart after being sat once. The sealing is not good, and dust will enter after a long time, and when focusing, the sound is still a little backlight, and when the light is too weak, it is difficult to focus, and sometimes it will be out of focus.

If it's just for fun, it's still worth buying 50 if it's used occasionally, and it's better if it's for professional use.

Very good, best value shots. Not one of them.

Macro lens, cheap, portraits can have a better bokeh effect. Without stabilization, you have to use a tripod when shooting, and the maximum image is double that of the real thing. To get a 1:1 image, you need an EF100, and of course you can do the same with a double-double extender.

If you have enough money, you can still enter the EF100 with anti-shake, and if you don't have enough money, you can add EF50 plus 2X extender and tripod,

The picture quality at this price is very good, the texture is very good, and the bokeh is also great, that is, pull the bellows when focusing, the sound is very loud, you can also consider the new 40mm biscuit head, the focus is very quiet, and the focal length is also close, which is expensive.

A sharp weapon for taking portraits, one of the three treasures of the poor, not bad!

It's enough, the maximum aperture is meaty, the workmanship is very plastic and general, and it's very cost-effective.

In terms of image quality, 50mm F II is better, after all, it is a fixed focal head, large aperture, and the image quality is not to be said, especially suitable for portraits.

In terms of use, 18-135 is naturally more extensive, covering the focal length from wide angle to medium telephoto, which can shoot most scenes, landscapes, portraits and other subjects.

It is inappropriate to compare the two together, after all, one is a fixed focus and the other is a zoom, and the purpose is different. The prime lens has good image quality and is often used in professional photography; Zoom lenses are easy to use and are often used for everyday shooting. Therefore, if you are at home, it is recommended to start with 18-135 to ensure the shooting of each scene, and then start with the fixed focus after being familiar with the characteristics of each focal length.

In fact, it's no problem to win both, 18-135 is about three or four thousand (it is recommended to buy a new one with an STM motor, which has better focusing and more advantages for shooting), while the 50mm F II is about seven hundred yuan (the cheapest large-aperture prime lens).

Canon + DSLR Portrait Small Spittoon Prime Lens + EF + 50mm + F Is it good for Canon 750D?

Pro, the Canon EF 50mm F STM Prime Lens is a standard lens for Canon 750D cameras, it supports Canon EF mount, the lens has a focal length of 50mm, and the maximum aperture is F, which is very suitable for portrait photography. In addition, the EF 50mm F STM is one of Canon's classic lenses, with excellent images and crisp image quality, especially for portrait portraits, even in low-light conditions, with excellent portraits with soft backgrounds**. As a result, this lens is paired with a Canon 750D camera to achieve a higher quality studio portrait**.

Canon + DSLR Portrait Small Spittoon Prime Lens + EF + 50mm + F Is it good for Canon 750D?

Yes, the Canon 750D is EF mount compatible, so Canon's EF 50mm F STM prime lens works with this camera. This lens is a very poor lens for portrait photography, with a large aperture and a shallow depth of field to help you shoot artistic portraits**. In addition, this lens has an STM motor that provides a smooth, silent Kaiqing autofocus, which is perfect for shooting**.

According to your needs, my suggestion is to use a small spittoon, although the two are relatively similar in terms of focal length, structure, and **, but there are still differences between the two.

Let's talk about the difference between lenses first. 50 hereinafter referred to as the small spittoon) and 40 hereinafter referred to as the 40 pie) The biggest difference lies in the positioning of these two lenses, the small spittoon is positioned in a relatively cheap large aperture header, and the positioning of the 40 pie is lightweight, very light. 40 pie is very light at the same time the mirror body is "very thin", there is basically no "protruding" feeling on the camera, such as 100D on the body has a great advantage, the smallest SLR body with the smallest SLR lens, its advantages are self-evident, 40 pie also has a large aperture, as well as the best STM motor.

The main difference between these two lenses is the positioning, as long as you choose the right lens for you according to your needs.

The small spittoon is equivalent to 135 on 500d, and the focal length is 80mm, shooting humanistic themes is not a strong point, shooting outdoor portraits and medium-focus landscapes is very dominant, and you can focus on capturing the subject matter if you sweep the street.

It is not recommended that you wear a telephoto, just pay a small spittoon. At the beginning, I was just like you, I didn't have enough money, and I thought about taking a photo with my phone at a wide angle. I was equipped with a 55-250 one, but the imaging quality was not good, so a small spittoon was added.

I actually used it, and I think that the lens of the telephoto segment must be good, because the telephoto segment is easier to perform.

Therefore, it is recommended that you ask for a small spittoon. In the future, if you have money, add a wide-angle lens, I plan to add a 14mm fixed focus before this year's National Day, maybe add a Sanyang one (mainly cheap, but this lens needs to be manually focused, and at the same time there is no image stabilization, but because the short focal length is generally not spent, and it is mainly landscape-based, you can also use a tripod, so it's okay, but it's best to have autofocus. If there was money then, it would have been replaced by a Sigma one,).

In the future, if you have money, you will add Xiaobai or Xiaoxiaobai.

There are also lenses that try to increase the full frame, and the depreciation is small.

Therefore, 18-55 or 18-135, 17-85, 55-250, 75-300, 70-300 these lenses are highly not recommended.

There is also a lens, Sigma 17-50, this imaging wide angle is actually good, but it is only half frame, so I prefer to pay more attention to the Korean brand Sanyang like a copycat, and the Sanyang 14mm is full-frame. And I've calculated it all carefully, and I'll give you a picture. It's all a comparison made for the sake of a wide-angle lens.

What is not written is half-frame, full-frame is in half-frame, and the wide angle is insufficient, such as Sanyang's full-frame is, to half-frame, and the others have not been found, but it is basically converted like this. So if you want to add it, it is recommended that you add a wide-angle one, just choose one from the following. I've basically listed all the good ones, but the Canon or Zeiss with the same configuration is too expensive to compare.

The color of the text and lines of the lens corresponds. The smallest pink wide-angle says Canon 50mm and the angle is 40, which is a small spittoon.

First, the scope of application.

The MM F has a moderate focal length, which can be applied in various occasions, and has a wide range of use but is not brilliant;

f The focal length is long, which is very suitable for portraits, and you can get very good-looking portraits with full body bokeh, and the range of application is not wide, except for portraits, which can only be taken close-ups.

2. Imaging. The overall quality of the two lenses is about the same, 85 F is slightly better, and the two lenses can easily feed the body of the configuration below 6D, and slightly barely above 5D3.

3. How to choose.

Choosing a lens is more about the focal length you need, the aperture you need, if you like tossing and shooting, shoot more portraits, then it is recommended 85 f this one, if you don't want to buy too many lenses, and you want a lens to hang up to solve most occasions, then it is recommended to use 50mm f this one.

C's 5014 and 8518 are not very worth buying, because they do not maintain their value, and they will definitely want to upgrade when used to a certain extent. With C's 5014 is not as good as the S's 5014,Just try to run the coke problem when you buy it.,The failure rate is not as high as rumored.,And as long as you don't want to 50L or Ze50, there's nothing to think about.,**There is not much gap.。 8518 is chicken ribs in the head of any one (except Minolta), although it is cheaper by at least 60% or even just a fraction of it, but, with 85 fixed focus, you will definitely want to 8514, and it will be changed after all, of course, C will change it85L, or ZE85 or something like that, S8514 is not recommended.

If you want to upgrade the fixed focus head C at this price, you can consider Lao Baiwei, and there is nothing else, because C's fixed focus is chicken ribs except for TSE17, and the non-red circles are all chicken ribs, which is not as good as not, or even as good as the transition of the auxiliary factory. The only exception is 5018

Thanks for the invite. Among the lenses of Canon cameras, the small spittoon refers to the 50 lens, which is a very cheap limb town.

And Canon's. 35 Lens should refer to mirrorless lens.

Well, if so, this lens also has a macro, I don't think I've ever seen a Canon SLR have a lens like this.

35 Lens should refer to mirrorless lens.

Let's not talk about SLR or mirrorless lenses, let's talk about the focal lengths of these two lenses.

50 shots. It is what we often call the standard lens, because it is similar to the feeling that our eyes see in the whole frame, and the width of the field of view is also comparable, it is a very representative lens, and it is very good to shoot portraits, humanities, flowers, etc.

50 shots. The good thing is in the full frame, this head shoots humanities and so on is very good, if used in half frame, it is a very good portrait lens.

35 fixed focus. SLR lens has 2 apertures, this lens is called a good lens for humanistic shooting, it is a wide-angle boundary focal length, shooting humanities and scenery is very good, of course, you can also shoot portraits, if you like to shoot documentary friends, you can consider this focal length.

35 fixed focus. If it is on a half-frame burning filial piety machine, this lens will become a header, and it is also relatively versatile. If used in full frame, it is the first choice for shooting indoor portraits.

Novices should not improve the quality of equipment by pursuing it, technology is king, but these two heads are very cheap, and they are also classic heads, if the economy is rich, it doesn't hurt. For example, imitation of indoor photography, the choice of lens depends on how big the interior is in the indoor photography you shoot, if it is less than 20 square meters of room shooting, it is recommended to use 35, because the head of 50 is equivalent to the middle focus of the APS machine preparation early tremor, you can only shoot a bust indoors, you can't shoot the whole body, if you often shoot outdoor portraits, the indoor area is also wide open to 20 square meters, you can consider 50 heads.