A villager said that he was a descendant of the king and took out a family tree as proof, did the ex

The expert later believed the words of this villager, because the genealogy taken out by this villager was confirmed to be indeed the genealogy of the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China, and what the villagers said was justifiedSo the expert affirmed the words of this villager.

This villager said that he was a descendant of Li Zicheng, the king of Chuang, but in fact, when he said that he was a descendant of the king at first, many people expressed shock, because according to folk records, Li Zicheng did not leave any descendants. It wasn't until the villager brought out his family tree that everyone calmed down and thought about it.

Experts specifically identify the authenticity of this genealogy, and although the specific time cannot be determined, the approximate time is indeed consistent with historical facts. In fact, it is a pity to talk about Li Zicheng, this person does have a certain military talent, and he also has the ambition of a bear that a general should have, and he does not drag his feetSo he was able to go from an ordinary peasant to the position of king.

But what is regrettable is that although he destroyed the Ming Dynasty, he did not retain the hearts of the people later, regardless of the lives of the people, and began to indulge in pleasure and depire himself, so in the end he was not able to succeed.

Everyone thought that Li Zicheng would die after his defeat, but according to this farmer, after Li Zicheng left Beijing, he managed to escape the pursuit of many people, and he was so lucky every time. So Li Zicheng lives with his brother, in order to avoid being truthfulThe elder brother also passed on his child to Li Zicheng, and Li Zicheng has since had his own descendants.

In the face of evidence and claims, experts naturally choose to believe it. After all, many rumors among the people still have no real evidence.

If the villagers say that they are descendants of Liu Bang and come up with a real family tree, the experts may believe it。In our country, it is not a fantasy that an ancestor has been an official, a king, or even an emperor. Because the Chinese are the most important blood inheritance.

The so-called "there are three unfilial pieties, and there is no posterity" shows that the ancients attached great importance to future generations. Of course, this refers specifically to boys. Especially for everyone's surname, "there is a queen" is extremely important.

Although there were frequent wars, poor medical care, and high mortality rates in ancient times, the ancients did not have family planning after allFrom ancient times to the present, the possibility of inheritance is still very high. In 2018, didn't Liu Qiangdong take the genealogy to find his roots and ask his ancestors, the most important thing is that according to the genealogy, Liu Qiangdong's ancestors are likely to be Liu Jiao, the fourth brother of Liu Bang, the ancestor of the Han Dynasty. Isn't it amazing that Liu Qiangdong can have a relationship with Liu Bang more than 2,000 years ago?

However, if a villager has to take the family tree and say that he is a descendant of Zheng He, and it happens that the villager is also called Zheng Chuichui, I think the experts will definitely not believe it. Actually,Genealogy can also be regarded as a special kind of historical material. And historical data is always true and falseDistinguishing the false from the true needs to be corroborated with other sources.

If you want to confirm a person's ancestry, the most scientific and credible way is of course DNA verification. In 2009, Cao Cao's tomb was discovered, and how many descendants of the Cao family emerged at that time. In the end, through the double verification of genealogy and DNA, it was proved that Cao Cao's descendants were Cao Zuyi in Donggang City, Dandong, Liaoning Province, and Cao Jia in Henan Village, Rushan, Shandong.

Of course, the restriction of DNA ancestor search is that the bones of one's ancestors are still alive. If the bones of the ancestors are gone, unless there is a history of letters, the old family tree may be falsified.

I think the latter must be believed, because there is no such thing as a genealogy that can be faked.

This expert should believe it, because this family tree is not easy to fake.

I think I might believe it, after all, no one would fake such a thing as a family.

should believe it, these villagers seem to have taken out jade seals to prove this.

Experts are not sure, after all, China has gone through a period of chaos, who can be sure that the genealogy must be his family?

Genealogy can be faked, and if it is the descendants of heroes, they really deserve to be treated better, and not to be a peasant.

At that time, experts believed that this genealogy was fake, because the paper of the real genealogy from ancient times to the present day had been damaged, and his paper was obviously forged by later generations.

For the descendants of the emperors of previous dynasties, that is, they can be very powerful in the family, but as a member of the society of New China, such ancestors are only showing off their capital, and it is impossible to bring any resources in terms of rights outside the rest。Before, an old farmer came to take his map for experts to identify, saying that he was a descendant of "King Chuang" Li Zicheng, but when the expert looked at the genealogy, he asserted that it was just "the same name".

In the history of China, the emperor said more than 400 emperors, it is not easy to be an emperor in this 2000 years, and it is a great honor for the ancestors to have such an emperor, if the ancestors are still Li Shimin, Qin Shi Huang and other figures, it is even more amazing. And the founding emperor is even more worthy of respect, generally the founding emperor will be crowned with the title of Gaozu, Taizu and so on by later generations, even if the dynasty is replaced later, the monarch of the next dynasty will also pay special respect to the emperor of the previous dynasty.

As soon as this old man came up, he said that he was a descendant of Li Zicheng, and the expert vetoed it at once, why is this. Let's take a look at Li Zicheng first, at the end of the Ming Dynasty, he was on a par with the Jurchens, and the Ming Dynasty army fell into disarrayIt is a pity that such a figure did not become an emperor, but he proclaimed himself the founding emperor of the Dashun Dynasty, but this dynasty did not exist for a long time before it perished.

And this old man said that it was not Li Zicheng who was killed back then, but Li Yan, the Marquis of Zhao, and the real LiZicheng fled to his uncle's house in the countryside early on, where he lived until his deathAnd I only now took out this genealogy. As for who says it is true, it is not easy to assess, but what the experts say is not necessarily right.

There is an old farmer surnamed Zhu in Anhui, there is a Nanmu chair with years, according to him he is a descendant of Zhu Yuanzhang, this chair is also left by Zhu Yuanzhang, in order to make a living, many ancestral treasures have been sold, only this chair was left, after learning the news, there have been many historical experts to Zhu Guodong's house to investigate, the chair is indeed a product of the early years of the Ming Dynasty, but it is not Zhu Yuanzhang left behind can not judge.

You have a question, that is, there is an old peasant who is a descendant of the founding king, and he took out Zhuopu to testify, what did the expert say after reading it? Which aspect of this do I think you're looking at? It's likely that the gossip you see is likely to be some kind of spam advertising or something, and there is no practical content, I suggest that these things are similar if you don't look at them, and it's likely that someone else has made some small stories, and there is no possibility of these things at all, and there are a lot of these small news like news that are advertising headlines.

Well, it's a descendant of the king, hurry up and get the sign around it, this farmer is of great value to our expert research projects.

I think this genealogy of the old peasant is fake and forged, because many people at that time said that they were descendants of the founding king.

In fact, many of these genealogies are unreliable, and people at that time relied on their noble ancestors in order to climb their relatives and become rich.

You can also make a copy of this if you want, what's the use, who cares if you're true these days, not to mention that this kind of forgery of a family tree is not a big problem, it's very easy!

After the identification of some contemporary advanced instruments and equipment, it was confirmed that the object did belong to the Ming Dynasty, but its ownership is a mystery, so the expert told him that we are not sure.

In fact, this is just some of the things that can be changed later, and it doesn't mean that it really is

The experts say yes, but so what!