The resurrection stone in Harry Potter can resurrect Harry, why can t it resurrect Dumbledore?

Updated on amusement 2024-02-25
20 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Harry Potter didn't really die, Voldemort killed the fragments of his soul that remained in Harry Potter's body. At that time, the purpose of Dumbledore's death was to force Voldemort out, in addition, Dumbledore was different from Harry Potter, he was not the owner of the three Deathly Hallows, and in the Harry Potter book, only having three Deathly Hallows at the same time could defeat death. Therefore, the Resurrection Stone can resurrect Harry Potter, but it cannot resurrect Dumbledore.

    Harry PotterIn heelVoldemortThere was no real death after the Great War, as was later onKing's Cross StationWhen he met Dumbledore, he could tell from what Dumbledore said. Voldemort simply killed the soul fragment in Potter's body. As a result, it is possible to summon the spirit of Harry Potter back upon resurrection.

    And Dumbledore was really dead at that time, of course, for him in this life, in order to defeat Voldemort and protect the school and the wizarding world, so once he has the opportunity to defeat Voldemort, he will not be afraid of death, and he is ready to die. <>

    Another reason is that Harry Potter has all three piecesDeathly Hallows, and Dumbledore did not become the true owner of the three Hallows, relying on just oneResurrection StoneIt can't be successful. But Harry Potter had these three Hallows in his hands when he died, and in the setting of the Harry Potter book, the owner who owns these three treasures can defeat death, and Dumbledore has never really owned these three Deathly Hallows, so it is difficult to be truly resurrected when resurrected alone. <>

    Of course, the most important point is that Harry Potter still has love, affection, and friendship in the wizarding world, but Dumbledore has nothing. For the sake of the wizarding world, he sacrificed all these nostalgic emotions. Death was more like relief to him, and perhaps he had this purpose in mind, using himself as a bait to lure Voldemort out, and he didn't want to live in the first place.

    I don't think even with these three Deathly Hallows, he wouldn't want to resurrect himself.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Harry was not resurrected because of the Resurrection Stone, he lost the Resurrection Stone on the way to find Voldemort, and the book says that he was resurrected because of his mother's love magic and because Voldemort resurrected with Harry's blood, so their lives were linked, and the snake horcrux was not destroyed at the time, so they both survived.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The reason why the Resurrection Stone can resurrect Harry but cannot resurrect Dumbledore is probably that the Resurrection Stone has been in Deng Xiao's hands until his death and was left to Harry in the form of a relic.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Because the Resurrection Stone could no longer be used after it had been used, Dunbu gave up using the Resurrection Stone himself when he died, leaving it to Harry.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Because the Resurrection Stone does not really resurrect the dead, but only allows the dead to appear in reality, resurrecting Dumbledore is not very useful.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Because this resurrection is not really able to resurrect the dead, but can only exchange for some undead, what he created is only some thoughts in the user's heart, not real, just a fantasy, and Dumbledore has too many thoughts in his heart, and he also wants a real one, so it can't be realized.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Harry was not resurrected by the Resurrection Stone, which can show visions of the dead, but cannot actually resurrect them. Harry picked up the Resurrection Stone in the Forbidden Forest and saw his parents, Sirius, and Lupin, who could talk but couldn't touch them. The reason why he didn't really die was that he was the owner of the Elder Wand.

    So Voldemort's attack on Harry with the Elder Wand didn't hurt him, it only knocked him unconscious and destroyed the fragments of Voldemort's soul in his body.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Harry wasn't dead in the first place, because Lily's magic had connected the two of them. Voldemort didn't die, and neither did Harry. Dumbledore's death had been planned months earlier, and he was reluctant to come back even if he used the Resurrection Stone.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Harry died of Voldemort's Horcruxes, not himself, and after he was resurrected, he had no contact with Voldemort, but Voldemort had consumed a lot of his own power...

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    There were three ...... death to HarryBut among the three brothers, there are only resurrection stones! He could resurrect his beloved, so why couldn't Harry resurrect Abs Dundondo with the Resurrection Stone?

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    I think Harry was the owner of three Deathly Hallows at the time, so conquered Death, while Dumbledore only had two.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Because the Resurrection Stone was already in a state of destruction when it fell into Harry's hands, it was definitely not possible to resurrect Dumbledore.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Harry was not resurrected by the Resurrection Stone, Harry did not die and the Resurrection Stone was useless. Can you take a good look at a book or a movie and then come out and say this kind of thing, you are disrespectful to the classics.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Harry Potter game parody.

    , some Harry Potter can be resurrected twice, due to the wand the player is equipped.

    The number of rescues can be increased.

    When Harry Potter is equipped with a maple wand, the number of rescues can be increased, so that it can be revived twice, increasing the forgiveness of combat.

    The Maple Staff is a special reward for the Nameless Book.

    Players need to open the Nameless Book, complete the quest of the Nameless Book by reading the chapters, and when the Star of the Nameless Book reaches 27 stars, they can receive the Maple Staff through the rewards page.

    Equipping the Maple Staff will increase the chance of rescue by 1, and the Maple Staff is more suitable for players to use when dueling in a team, and can be resurrected multiple times to occupy the advantage of the duel.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Harry PotterHe didn't die due to the spell, but the Horcrux in Harry's body died.

    May 2 due to Voldemort.

    's Killing Curse struck Harry, destroying the fragment of Voldemort's soul possessed inside Harry, depriving Harry of the ability to talk to snakes.

    Since Voldemort took Harry's blood when he was resurrected, Lily's spell was present in both of them, so Harry miraculously came back from the dead to kill Voldemort in the final duel.

    After and good friend Ron.

    Ginny's sister got married and had children, while Ron and Hermione.

    also happily walked on the red carpet. All the secrets have been revealed. Nineteen years later, Harry and Ginny have three children, and Hermione and Ron have two children. The two families reunite on Platform Nine and Three-Quarters to take the children to Hogwarts.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Professor Snape gave Harry his memories before he died, and Harry learned that he was Voldemort's last Horcrux, and that Voldemort could only die if Harry was dead [which is why Harry repeatedly told Neville to kill Voldemort's snake before going to the Forbidden Forest].

    The Resurrection Stone can only summon the souls of the deceased rather than the real resurrection of the dead, he used the Resurrection Stone to summon his parents, Godfather and Lupin to accompany him until the end, and after throwing the stone, they all disappeared, Harry was able to survive because Voldemort's spell killed his Horcrux [so they both fainted together], Harry was able to survive because Lily protected Harry with her own life, the so-called magic of love =

    When Voldemort insisted on doing it himself, because he had killed Harry because of his mistake back then, he had made himself a ghost for so many years, in fact, it was his own obsession, just like obsessive-compulsive disorder=

    Didn't he keep saying that Potter was mine, otherwise if Bella or whoever else did it, Harry would have died long ago ==

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Harry. Not resurrected by the Resurrection Stone, the Resurrection Stone can show visions of the dead, but cannot actually resurrect them. Harry picked up his stockings in the Forbidden Forest and saw his parents, Sirius, and Lupin, who could talk but couldn't touch them.

    The reason why he didn't really die was that he was the owner of the Elder Wand. So Voldemort.

    Attacking Harry with the Elder Wand didn't hurt him, it only knocked him unconscious and destroyed the fragments of Voldemort's soul in his body.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Harry was not resurrected by the Resurrection Stone, Harry was not dead and the Resurrection Stone was useless. If you can't take a good look at a book or a movie and then come out and say this kind of thing, you are not respectful of the classics.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    There were three ...... death to HarryBut among the three brothers, there are only resurrection stones! He could resurrect his beloved, so why couldn't Harry resurrect Abhus Tremor Burning Dundondo with the Resurrection Stone?

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    When Dumbledore got the ring, he couldn't tell where the Resurrection Stone was, and the Resurrection Stone was hidden inside. Dumbledore was so longing for his loved ones that he had a strong desire for the Resurrection Stone itself, so he put the ring on.

    But because there are souls in it, and these souls can dominate the emotions of those who are close to it, Lao Deng was cursed because he couldn't control his emotions after wearing it.

    Original: After all these years, I finally found it buried in the Gaunt's deserted mansion - it was the Hallows I had longed for the most, but when I was young I wanted it for some other reason - and I was dizzy, Harry. I forgot that it was already a Horcrux, that the ring must have a spell on it.

    I picked it up and put it on my hand, and for a moment I thought I was going to see Ariana, my mother, my father, and tell them how much remorse I had in my heart.

Related questions
3 answers2024-02-25

Harry PotterThe classic line with the Philosopher's Stone is that the time to come will always come, and once it comes, you have to face it bravely. There are many types of courage, and it takes superhuman courage to deal with enemies, and it also takes a lot of courage to stand your ground in front of your friends. >>>More

7 answers2024-02-25

Voldemort. You can know what is going to happen through the prophecy ball, and after it is broken, a white mist comes out of the prophecy ball, and a voice says the prophecy, but no one else can hear its voice, only Harry. >>>More

9 answers2024-02-25

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

Brought a mysterious letter: inviting Harry to an incredible place that he—and all who read Harry's story—would find forever unforgettable—Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. >>>More

20 answers2024-02-25

Harry's mom was with her sister when she received the Hogwarts offer, "My dad and mom were overjoyed, only I knew she was a freak. (Part 1, when Hagrid came to Vernon's house) So the Vernons knew about magic because they knew the cause of James Potter and Lily Potter's deaths. The only Muggles who knew about the existence of witchcraft were the Vernons. >>>More

6 answers2024-02-25

According to the landlord, Hermione should be older than Harry and Ron, at least bigger than Ron, right, let's sort out these points first, Harry was born on July 31, Ron is March 1, about 5 months older than Harry, and Hermione is September 19, whether the date is correct or not, yes, Hermione is in September, and according to this, Hermione was born in Ron Harry, the year before, and the landlord is not wrong about this, in fact, it is very simple reasoning, and these reasonings are all right, so let's write a picture: Hermione ———New Year's) - Ron ——— Harry September 19 January 1 March 1 July 31 It seems clear that Hermione is almost 1 year older than Harry and half a year older than Ron Since Hermione is in September, it will start in September and she will be 12 years old when she enters the school, but if you push it to the time when the school is 11 years old, there is no way to explain it It can only be said that it is the author's mistake Ron and Harry both entered the school at the age of 11 It is lucky to meet 12-year-old Hermione Hehe I hope it will help you.