How to write a good literary criticism essay, how to write a literary work or literary criticism?

Read more, think more, and read more of other people's literature**.

Literary criticism includes poetry criticism, ** review, prose review, drama review, film and television review, etc. "My Father and Mother" is the movie. The film is a collection of screenwriters, directors, actors, cinematography, and literary critics.

**, art, editing, costumes, props, makeup, lighting, stunts are equal to a kind of collective creation of comprehensive art, film and television criticism can not only make comprehensive comments on many aspects, but also focus on a certain aspect. Thought Review.

Thought criticism Literary criticism is different from thought criticism in general. The object of ideological criticism is social life and the various ideological problems that people manifest in their life and work, with the purpose of helping people improve their ideological understanding and distinguish between right and wrong. It can be argued through a variety of materials, as long as it sticks to the point you are trying to make. The object of literary criticism is literary works (**, poetry, prose, drama, painting, film and television, etc.); The purpose of criticism is to improve the level of reading and appreciation through discussion and evaluation of its ideological content, creative style, artistic characteristics, etc., and of course it is possible to cite and cite various materials for argumentation when commenting, but the various materials cited on the side should be related to literary works, and the materials used in literary criticism are basically from the literary works themselves.

Difference from work analysis.

Difference from work analysis.

In addition, literary criticism is different from general analysis of works. Of course, from a certain point of view, literary criticism should first be based on the analysis of the work, without analyzing how to comment; And the analysis itself naturally contains the evaluation of the work. However, there is still a difference, and the analysis of the work focuses on talking about the work "as it is"; The commentary focuses on "why it is like this" and "whether it is good or not".

Literary criticism must have a general evaluation of the work, and there is a certain process of argumentation for your evaluation, but the analysis of the work does not necessarily have a total evaluation of the work. In addition, when writing literary criticism, you don't have to quote the raw material at length, as that will crowd out your argument with the raw material; Comment points should be focused and distinct. For example, if you write such a grand classical masterpiece as "Commenting on Dream of Red Mansions", where do you start commenting?

It's hard to write, but if you narrow it down to "commenting on the dialogues of the characters in "A Dream of Red Mansions", and then narrowing it down to "commenting on the linguistic characteristics of Feng Laozi in "A Dream of Red Mansions", it's easy to write. The point of view should be clear, and the analysis of conclusive materials should be used to support the point of view, and the cited material should first come from the work itself, and of course, it can also be cited from the side, and the material analysis and point of view should always be consistent. For works that readers do not know much about, they should give a certain explanation of their relevant aspects before commenting.

When facing the above four questions, I personally believe that different skills and characteristics are required. The following are the analysis and suggestions for different topics:

National Volume A "People, Technology, Time".

This question is relatively smooth and abstract, and requires candidates to have a high level of thinking ability and depth of thinking. As literary writers, we may need to express our thoughts about human beings and time through stories or poems, and we may even need to incorporate elements of future technology.

Recommendations:1Think deeply about the nature of human beings and the meaning of life, and express it through stories.

2.Consider incorporating elements of future technology into your work to create a unique space for imagination.

The national volume B "A Flower Blooming Alone is Not Spring".

This question is relatively difficult and requires candidates to have a high level of literary appreciation and aesthetic ability. As literary writers, we need to have a deeper interpretation and understanding of different literary works to get inspiration and inspiration.

2.Use your literary appreciation skills to deeply interpret the work, and discover the themes and emotions that the author wants to express.

The new curriculum standard Volume I "The Power of Stories".

This question is relatively easy and requires candidates to have basic writing skills and story-writing skills. As literary writers, we need to have our own stories and be able to create meaningful literature through our lives and experiences.

Recommendations:1Through your own life and experiences, you can create stories with depth and meaning.

2.Cultivate your writing ability and creative ability, create and share more works, and constantly improve your level.

The new curriculum standard Volume II "Teenagers' Own Space".

This question is relatively practical and requires candidates to have a high level of practical ability and social responsibility. As literary writers, we need to have an in-depth understanding and awareness of social issues and youth issues, and be able to express our own views and opinions through literary works.

2.Use literature as a radical work to express your own views and opinions, and show your sense of social responsibility and literary ability.

Summary: Different topics require candidates to have different abilities and skills, and as a literary writer, they may need to improve their level through a variety of ways and means, and be able to flexibly respond to different creative challenges.

Reading for literary criticism is a process of appropriation of material and investigation and research. It is only through reading that a strong foundation for writing can be built. From the perspective of the writing requirements of literary criticism, reading should not only combine points and faces, but also combine depth and shallowness.

Have a correct and clear point of view (argument). When we comment on a work of literature, we always have to have a basic opinion: is it good or bad?

Is it basically good and has shortcomings, or is it basically bad but there is something to be desired? This basic view is the central thesis of the article, and this argument must be correct and clear.

It is necessary to use scientific methods of argumentation that conform to logical reasoning. Whether to use induction, deductive, or analogy should be carefully considered. Moreover, whether to write a review of the argument or a review to refute the argument also needs to be determined according to the purpose of the writing, from the actual situation of the work and the needs of the reader.

Literary criticism is also different from general analysis of works. Of course, from a certain point of view, literary criticism should first be based on the analysis of the work, and there is no analysis of how to comment; And the analysis itself naturally contains the evaluation of the work. However, there is still a difference, and the analysis of the work focuses on talking about the work "as it is"; The commentary focuses on "why it is like this" and "whether it is good or not".

The way to write article reviews is generally to make a pertinent evaluation from the center, material selection, structure, expression, language and writing of the article.

1.Center: If there is any digression, write according to the requirements of the topic.

2.Material selection: Whether it is around the center or not. Whether it is true or not, in line with the reality of life. Is it fresh and interesting.

3.Structure: Whether the hierarchical paragraphs are clear. Whether the transition is natural. Whether the beginning and end are correct.

4.Expression: Does the narrative explain things clearly and completely? Write the scenery and write the order of the visit clearly. Be detailed properly, write down important people and things in detail, and write briefly about unimportant places.

5.Language: Whether the sentences are fluent and accurate, and there are few sick sentences.

Whether you use metaphors, comparisons, personifications, exaggerations, etc. Is there any Zheng Huaihong using idioms, sayings, proverbs, famous quotes, poems and other beautiful words and sentences. Punctuation is appropriate.

6.Writing: Whether the font is neat and there are few typos. Whether the roll surface is neat and clean, and the application is less.