Where are the Snapdragon processors and HiSilicon Kirin processors manufactured?

One is more expensive and the other is more expensive.

Advantages and disadvantages of HiSilicon Kirin processors and Qualcomm Snapdragon processors.

Hello, for HiSilicon processors and Qualcomm Snapdragon processors, there is no problem with the baseband of Huawei HiSilicon's processors, which is still the industry's leading technology. And the AP is a bit problematic, and the performance is slightly behind;

The advantage of Kirin is power consumption control, the same as MediaTek, and the disadvantage is that the CPU is integrated and Qualcomm is not a level of things, and the compatibility of playing large games will be a little worse because there is no decoding package for the Kirin processor.

Before the Kirin 960, Huawei's processor always made people feel decent, not bad, and it was indeed a certain distance from the flagship processor in our minds. Moreover, its GPU part has always been a short board, so it is not suitable for large game enthusiasts.

But with ARM

After Mali-G71, the Kirin 960 has been greatly upgraded in terms of GPU, and the comprehensive performance has surpassed that of the Snapdragon 821, which can basically meet the needs of any user. This is certainly a good thing, but the Kirin 960 is a big iteration of the Kirin 960, and its real competitor should be this year's Snapdragon 835, not the Snapdragon 821. Therefore, this Huawei HiSilicon processor belongs to the mid-to-high-end field, so it is suitable for those users who have high requirements for mobile phone performance, but do not have the ultimate pursuit.

The Kirin processor will also have more room to play in the process technology and GPU performance, but the current Kirin 960 has not done it.

Both Snapdragon and HiSilicon processors have models with strong performance and models with lower performance, and if you want to compare performance and user experience, it is recommended to provide processor models to compare, which is meaningless than brands and is easy to fall into a war of words.

Qualcomm Snapdragon processors are generally TSMC and Samsung foundry; Most of the Kirin processors are foundry by TSMC, and a small part are foundry by SMIC.

I think the Snapdragon processor is a little better. In layman's terms, it is analyzed:

01. Play large-scale games, Snapdragon beats the unicorn

The Snapdragon processor is a little better than the Kirin in terms of GPU, and the Snapdragon is specifically optimized for gaming, so users will feel a better experience when playing games. A very intuitive experience is that when you use a Huawei phone to play games and play games with a Xiaomi phone, you obviously feel that Xiaomi will be a little more silky.

Because of the performance, it will also cause the Kirin processor to reduce the frequency when playing games. Therefore, your gaming experience will also decrease with the reason for the downclock, and you will find, hey, how can this game still have a sense of frame drops? You might even find out, how did it still flash back?

02. In terms of running scores, Snapdragon beats Kirin

In terms of running scores, you can directly take the Snapdragon 855 and Kirin 980 as examples. The running score itself is a problem that many people are more concerned about, although there is a certain "useless theory", but the running score can indeed objectively reflect the performance of the processor.

The running score of the Snapdragon 855 is basically stable above 380,000, while the running score of the Kirin is only in the early 300,000s, so in terms of running scores, the Snapdragon is also completely beating the Kirin. Therefore, in terms of performance of the two processors, the Snapdragon 855 is also superior to the Kirin 980.

03. In terms of cost performance, Snapdragon is higher than Kirin

In fact, if you don't have a particularly high pursuit in using a mobile phone, and you are not particularly sensitive to the sense of experience, there is not much difference between the two processors in daily use. But in terms of cost performance, the Snapdragon processor is also higher than the Kirin processor, which is very obvious in the market pricing.

For example, the mobile phones currently equipped with Kirin 980 are basically priced at 2000+; The mobile phone equipped with Snapdragon 855 not only has a price of 2000+, but also a lot of prices for thousand-yuan machines, for consumers, it is obvious that Snapdragon is more cost-effective.

To sum up, I think the Snapdragon processor is better than the Kirin processor.

Foreign netizens discuss which is the best, Kirin processor or Snapdragon processor!

OPPO Reno running score**! The Snapdragon processor beats the Kirin 980 by a lot, which is fantastic.