Debate Cooperation is a better contributor to civilization than competition

Competition promotes social progress. From the perspective of the development of modern society, society is realized in the competition of metabolism, and civilization develops in a cycle of challenges and responses. Economic growth, as a competitive development process, leads to the transformation of the competitiveness between organizations and between countries, and the development competition of catching up with others can make backward become advanced, and society is to follow this eternal law of competition to move towards modernity and to the future.

Darwin's theory of evolution is not.

Confined only to the field of biology, it reveals the inevitability of competition. The primitive society, the strife of the pre-Qin countries, the plundering and war of the colonizers, which time did the society not show a new look in the competition? From the perspective of historical materialism, the history of human civilization for thousands of years is, in a sense, the history of class struggle, and just as Marx said, there can be no progress without confrontation.

This is the law that civilization has followed to this day. It can be seen that competition has promoted the development of civilization more widely than cooperation.

3. Competition is the law of nature and the source of human civilization. If we want to understand whether competition can make civilization progress better, we must first understand what is called competition and what is development, and competition is the process of direct or indirect competition between people for the same goal, which is benign, not vicious competition. Development is about things from small to large, from shallow to deep, from low to high.

How did we humans evolve from a group of apes to a group of advanced animals that can walk upright, think independently, and dominate the natural world? The evolution of human beings is the result of constant selection by nature, and the reason why human beings can adapt to this choice is because of competition, the result of constant competition with nature. Wouldn't it be better for apes to get smarter and smarter by hiding hand in hand in caves?

Our ancestors have long told us that competition can lead to civilization and progress "The survival of the fittest" is not only the law and basic driving force of the evolution of nature, but also the source of power for the progress of human society.

If there is competition, there will be motivation, which will make oneself continue to improve, and cooperation will make people dependent, lack of motivation, have no own opinions, take into account the feelings of others in everything, think about the overall situation, and lack their own thoughts.

Then you can say: "In the competition, we can see our own shortcomings, and we can better correct our shortcomings." "Let's give you a more fashionable example, Liu Xiang in the 04 Athens Olympics and yesterday's 11th Games, without the strong pressure of the opponent, Liu Xiang would not have such a perfect performance.

Therefore, it is more possible to make progress in the competition.

You can hone your mind. Know the frustration of failure. Understand that success doesn't come easily. Make yourself successful without pride, and fail without discouragement.

Whether it is competition, or cooperation, the ability of individuals determines everything, ability is the premise, the foundation...

What is the purpose of your collaboration? Isn't it just to compete with others?

1.In the statement just now, it was mentioned that Liu Bei and Sun Quan's cooperation against Cao Cao was to enhance their strength and better competition, doesn't this just show that competition is more important than cooperation?

2.May I ask the other side, can the cooperation of the United States, Britain and other countries to attack Iraq also make civilization progress?

3.The other side argued that China's football team could not win against Japan and South Korea, not because of a lack of a sense of cooperation, but because we lack a sense of competition, even if we have high technology, no sense of competition, and the desire to win, then no matter what, we will not be able to win.

4.The competition is to win and lose, and isn't it also competition to win and lose? Why are you competing here, isn't it also for the sake of competition?

5.The sense of competition is an indispensable condition for the growth of talents, and the competition in higher education and business is very fierce.

6.Modern society requires the use of quantity, competition for posts, may I ask the other party, is competition more important than cooperation? You can't cooperate with each other, can you?

7.If we don't work together and don't innovate, we will only stop moving. If competition isn't that important, then what are we arguing about here today?

8.May I ask if the evil forces and gangs in society cooperate to run rampant and do all kinds of evil, can they also make civilization progress? The Iraqi people have suffered from the war disasters brought upon them by the United States, do they want the Iraqi people to cooperate with the United States?

9.Please ask the other party's defense friend, are you cooperating or competing in the exam, if it is cooperation, it is cheating! Isn't it also a competition for countries to compete in the Olympics? Could it be that athletes from all countries also cooperate and divide the gold medals equally?

10.As international competition becomes more complicated, may I ask the other side what keeps the market alive? Obviously, competition is more conducive to the progress of civilization than cooperation, and is more conducive to the metabolism and overall progress of society.

11.Isn't our cooperative learning today precisely for the purpose of going out into society in the future and better participating in the competition?

Positive: Cooperation can promote social development more, because cooperation means that the two sides can borrow each other's capabilities and resources to maximize the overall efficiency of the two parties, and greatly reduce the waste of resources and capabilities caused by "doing their own thing". Under the same conditions, cooperation can better promote social development;

Opposite: competition can promote social development more, because, the development of society, relying on the newer better, rather than following the rules, and to achieve better updates, the only way out is to compete with each other, in order to ensure that they are not eliminated, the two sides of the competition will inevitably try their best to constantly bring forth the new, and strive to keep themselves in the competition to maintain an advantage, and the results of the two sides of the competition continue to innovate, to the society, is precisely development;

Whether it is positive or negative, the key is: the positive side should stand in the perspective of the overall existence of the society and explain the advantages of cooperation; The opposing side must stand in the perspective of the driving force of social development and progress, and explain the advantages of competition;

In fact, whether it is positive or negative depends on the different positions and perspectives from which they stand, and it is not very interesting to debate with each other based on the results obtained from different angles.