The contradiction of literary talent is more important than eloquence debate competition

Positive: Literary talent is important. Such as a woman or something. Opposite: In today's society, eloquence is used in communication, and eloquence is also used in conversations with others and business negotiations.

It's useless to say it well, the key is to rely on the real guy, that is, the literary talent!!

Can a man with literary talents express his talents correctly?

1. The core concepts of "literary talent" and "eloquence";

2. The soul of the question is "more important";

3. First of all, we must admit that both literary talent and eloquence are important, but we must state the reasons why literary talent or eloquence are more important than the other party, and then give examples to demonstrate.

4. If you think that literary talent is more important than eloquence, you can ask:

The inheritance of culture mainly depends on the pen, and in the vast historical works, can you listen to the eloquence of your ancestors by ear?

Can you articulate complex and rigorous theories eloquently?

Isn't it an oral test on the premise of passing a written test?

If you think that eloquence is more important than literary talent, you can ask:

Is it enough for leading cadres at all levels to go down to the grassroots level to do the work of the masses and publish an excellent article?

Of the many political figures, which one is not clever and eloquent? Aren't all those pen sticks who dance and ink their subordinates?

Isn't it often the case that a leader makes a deep impression on important occasions? And isn't it often such a casual word that shapes a great man and creates an era?

Thank you, Chair! Good evening, judges, friends and students watching the competition!

The opponent's defense friend just said that writing is the basis of eloquence, but this argument is not valid. Instead of clarifying the meaning of literary talent and eloquence, the opposing defense friend mistakenly expanded the meaning of literary talent and infinitely narrowed the concept of eloquence. The Modern Chinese Dictionary defines literary talent as the ability to write, which refers to the way people write poems to convey their own opinions and feelings, and give full play to their written expression talents.

Eloquence is the ability to speak, debate, and speak in social communication, and it is a comprehensive manifestation of a person's knowledge level and thinking ability. It can be seen that literary talent and eloquence are two different ways of embodying human thinking, and they will intersect in some aspects, but there is no basis for who is who. Their common basis should be the accumulation of knowledge, etc.

Therefore, the opponent's defense friend cannot arbitrarily say that a writing talent is the basis of eloquence. (Foundation, cultural communication, etc.).

I'll give you an example from life, the teacher or the interviewer asks you a question, don't you say, write down your thoughts on paper? No matter how good a person's humanities are, but his eloquence is not good, and he stammers in his speech, will he make a good impression? This is in response to the proverb "Dumplings boiled in a teapot - you can't pour them out!"

satirizes those who have literary talents but are not good at expressing their ideas and opinions. I think everyone should know that in terms of occupation, there are far more people who rely on eloquence to eat than on literary talent. This illustrates the idea that eloquence is more important than literary talent.

Because eloquence directly acts on people, while literature acts on people first on things, and then on people. Eloquence is faster than literary talent in terms of the way of transmission, and it is more infectious and influential.

Eloquence has a wider range of applications and more practical effects than literary talents, so it is more important than literary talents. On a personal level, a person's eloquence reflects his level of thinking, psychological quality, worldview, and outlook on life. People with eloquence are more persuasive, more able to express their thoughts directly and accurately, and more adaptable to the needs of society.

On a social level, good eloquence makes communication more efficient, and good eloquence can also help you build excellent interpersonal relationships, thereby contributing to social development. Eloquence is more important, more far-reaching, and more practical in terms of meaning and function.

I believe that all of you here know that in daily life, the practical effect of eloquence is incomparable to that of literary talent. Good eloquence is easy to understand; The writing is good, but sometimes it is not easy to understand. Eloquence shows a quick-response wit; Literary talent is otherwise, just like this debate competition, no matter how much preparation is in the early stage, it is the king to play on the court.

The use of eloquence can directly communicate with both parties in both directions, while literary talents can often only be output in one direction. Two-way communication can provide timely feedback, and its effect is inevitably better than one-way output.

To sum up, we adhere to the view that "eloquence is more important than literary talent".