In World War II, the United States was initially neutral

Updated on military 2024-02-09
31 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The United States wants to neutralize the country, but he wants to balance the world.

    Since he doesn't want to annex the whole world, the United States can sell steel to Japan, but it will not watch Germany and Japan encroach on the whole world, and in the end he will be in danger, and the United States claims to be democratic and free.

    The U.S. embargo on Japan will make it impossible for the Chinese battlefield and Japan itself to hold on. Naturally, the United States is going to be beaten.

    The United States was an ally of Britain and sent so much equipment, oil, and supplies to Britain through Iceland.

    The German navy finally blocked the British sea, and the air force beat Britain half to death, and as a result, the world's first industrial power was sent to Britain.

    Since Japan has declared war, German submarines have just followed suit.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    1.Sit on the mountain and watch the tiger fight, weaken the strength of other countries, and preserve the strength.

    2. Seek war wealth, sell armament materials, and make a windfall.

    3. Reduce the threat of fascist countries to the United States and reduce frontal conflicts.

    4. Lay the foundation for the distribution of spoils after the war.

    Later, it was the Japanese devils who attacked Pearl Harbor and Germany's unlimited submarine policy to force the United States to enter the war, so the so-called justice and injustice are all excuses, just to deceive the trust of the international community, all for their own interests, no country is willing to do free assistance, the landlord will give me the best, thank you.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Because isolationism was prevalent in the United States at the time, most Americans felt that war was far away from them. Unwilling to sacrifice for the struggle of other countries. The fascists did not threaten them and there was money to be made, so why not?

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Continental doctrine was prevalent, many veterans of World War I opposed getting involved in the war, and the United States was recovering from the Great Depression, and the number of active soldiers in the United States was very small.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    At that time, the United States had an isolated mentality and wanted to protect its own interests.

    Besides, as long as the United States protects its own interests, even if it hits his own mother, he doesn't care = =

    This is how the United States made war money during World War I.

  6. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    1. There were a lot of casualties in the First World War.

    2, so there is a strong isolationist mentality.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    He waited for the fascist overdraft.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    This is the result of the self-isolationism adopted by the United States.

    The United States pursued a long-standing foreign policy of non-alliance with European powers and no obligations before World War II. In the early days of independence, the United States first considered developing its own economic and military strength, concentrating its activities mainly on the American continent, avoiding getting involved in political and military conflicts in Europe in its foreign relations, not undertaking political and military obligations in the international community, and not forming alliances with foreign countries, especially with major European powers. Early diplomatic isolationism played a certain historical role in protecting the national interests of the newly founded United States, and had a profound impact on US foreign policy.

    Initially, having suffered a great deal in the First World War, the United States began to pursue isolationism in the 20s, determined not to participate in any military conflict in Europe again. The isolationist tendencies of the time also led to the introduction of a strict tariff regime, which is considered an important trigger for the later Great Depression. After the outbreak of World War II, the United States gradually leaned towards its allies, and abandoned this national policy altogether after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941.

    Later in the Second World War, isolationism was replaced by the global strategy of the United States.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Just look at the history of World War I, the United States did not participate in the war at the beginning, but only sold arms to the two major military blocs as a neutral country and made war profits, but because it traded more with the Allied countries, and formally felt that the war situation was inclined to the Allied countries, in order to get Germany's war reparations as the victorious country, so in April 1917, the United States announced its participation in World War I. The First World War ended in November 1918. To put it bluntly, the United States is the grass on the wall, followed by the oil.

    In that era of information underdevelopment, Americans did not realize that their national power was strong.

    The United States also has such a political position in World War II, don't look at Britain and the United States are so friendly politically, before the United States entered the war, all of them were non-governmental organizations to aid Britain, and it was originally intended to be the same as World War I, waiting for the war to come to an end, and then one side would support the victorious side with a clear victory rate, if Japan had not attacked Pearl Harbor (the attack on Pearl Harbor made the United States completely support the Allies), maybe, in the end, the United States united Germany and Japan to win World War II.

    Remember the saying, there are no eternal friends and no eternal enemies in politics!!

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The foundation of the nation is the creed of neutrality.

    It's a warning to all continents, not only Western Europe.

    But Winston Churchill has no eternal friends, no permanent enemies, only eternal interests, you remember.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    In the early days, it was thought that it was just a war for the Europeans, and that it had nothing to do with the United States, and after Pearl Harbor, the United States suffered heavy losses, so it entered the war.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Because the United States was scared by the First World War.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    I want to make a profit from it and reap the benefits of a fisherman.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    The entry of the United States into the war only hastened the end of World War II, but it did not affect the outcome of World War II.

    At the beginning of World War II, the United States maintained neutrality, not only neutrality, but also wantonly made war money to both warring countries. In fact, the United States was able to rise in the end, and the two world wars played a key role.

    It is no exaggeration to say that if there were no two world wars, although the United States could have been strong, it would never have become the hegemon of the future. The United States really made a windfall in the war, and these goods enriched the national strength of the United States.

    The United States entered the war, mainly because Japan attacked Pearl Harbor in the United States. It can be said that if Japan had not attacked Pearl Harbor in the United States, it is very likely that the United States would not have entered the war in the end, and would not have been involved in this war. According to the principle of the United States, they would continue to do business with both the belligerents, which was also their consistent style at that time.

    Even if the Pearl Harbor incident did not happen, even if it did not participate in the war, the countries that suffered from fascist aggression would still resist vigorously, after all, this is a war of life and death and a matter of national fortunes. For example, if we in China resist Japanese aggression, wouldn't we have fought without foreign aid? No way, we are not fighting for anyone, we are fighting for the entire Chinese nation, so we will not give up resistance no matter what.

    Besides, at that time, Japan had been dragged down by our country, and Japan's territory was small and its resources were limited, which determined that Japan would have great consumption in the war. The early stage was fine, but in the later stage, Japan simply could not afford the attrition of the war, and in the end, Japan would only be defeated. The same is true in Germany.

    The German raid on the Soviet Union caused trouble to the Soviet Union to a certain extent. At the beginning of the war, the Soviet Union suffered heavy losses, but the Soviet Union, which had recovered its strength, began to counterattack, and the invincible German army was severely beaten by the Soviet army. The Germans suffered heavy losses in the Soviet Union, and Germany was the most powerful of the fascists, almost exhausting their elite forces in the Soviet Union.

    Germany's defeat is also a foregone conclusion, it is only a matter of time.

    As for Italy, the strength of the country at that time was really not very good. In both world wars, it surrendered first, and it can be said that it was simply a joke, almost negligible. Coupled with Mussolini's precarious domination at home, far inferior to that of Japan and Germany, it is not surprising that it became the first fascist state to surrender.

    As for the entry of the United States into the war, it was because Japan threatened his interests. It is undeniable that the economic and military strength of the United States is really very strong, far surpassing Japan, so the United States can basically win easily against Japan, and in the end the United States also dropped atomic bombs on Japan, forcing Japan to surrender ahead of schedule.

    However, we cannot think that it was the United States that defeated Japan, that it was the joint efforts of countless anti-fascist countries, that the United States only hastened Japan's surrender, that the United States' participation in the war has greatly increased the strength of the anti-fascists, and that everyone has fought against the fascist forces together, and that the United States has indeed contributed a lot in this regard.

    For example, it is indeed a good thing that we will be able to provide a certain amount of assistance to our country and reduce the pressure on Japan alone, but we must understand that even without the United States, fascism will fail.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Even if the United States does not enter the war in the end, the outcome of World War II will not change, and the Nazi bloc led by Germany will still be completely defeated.

    First, at that time, Germany was already in a bitter war in the Soviet Union, and the entire main force was dragged by the Soviet Union, coupled with the opening of the second battlefield of the Allied forces, so that Germany had no strength to deal with it at all, and Germany's defeat was inevitable.

    2. Under the protracted war of the Communist Party, the Japanese aggressors already had a shortage of support, and the result of continuing was that Japan had no soldiers to recruit at all, and in the end they could only fail.

    So the entry of the United States only hastened the end of the whole war, and not the most critical absolute factor.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Even if the United States had remained neutral during World War II, World War II would have ended the same as it is now, because America's entry into the war would only accelerate the process.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    If World War II had become independent, then we would have fought for a longer time on the battlefield in China, and although we could win, we would have lost miserably. In the European theater, Germany could no longer stop the attack of the British, French and Russian forces, so the European theater allies won.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Because after World War I, the people in the United States have a strong sense of anti-war, and the United States is a democratic country, and the decision depends on the consciousness of the people, so on the eve of World War II, the United States has always opposed entering the war and remained neutral.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    After World War I, many people in the United States felt that it was not worth it for Europeans to die for Europe and for Europeans to repay their debts. The Americans decided to do their own thing, regardless of Europe. This is isolationism, and some politicians in the United States see that sooner or later they will enter the war, and they will not be able to fight it, but they will not be able to convince Congress and the public, and it is not until Pearl Harbor that the United States is attacked, that they take advantage of the situation to enter the war.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    On the fourth floor, many people died in the United States at one stop, and there was no benefit, so the people in China advocated isolationism.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    Because the various conflicts that broke out on the eve of World War II were not directly related to the United States itself.

    It was not until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that the conflict began to have a direct relationship with the United States.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    1. The United States profited from World War I, and huge economic interests induced the United States to remain neutral.

    2. The economic situation in the United States at that time did not allow the United States to enter the war.

    3. In the political competition between the Republican and Democratic parties, neither side has found a reasonable reason to enter the war.

    4. The international status of the United States at that time also did not allow pointing fingers in international affairs.

    5. The United States' judgment on European affairs and domestic legislation are constrained.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    It's none of your business, so why intervene?

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    Because they thought that the war had nothing to do with them and could not affect them, they remained neutral.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    That's because of the independent policy of the United States at that time. They believed that the war would not reach the United States, so they remained neutral.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    At that time, the United States was vigorously developing its domestic economy, and both sides were making a fortune by reselling, and they did not want to participate at all.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-10

    The United States remained neutral in World War II for its own national interests. So the United States was timely, the strength of World War II was very strong, and the military power was very strongBut the United States doesn't want to cause a lot of trouble, but during World War II, the United States also made profits from other countries. So the United States can be regarded as making war money.

    Since independence, the United States has developed very rapidly, and in just over 200 years, it has become the number one power. At the end of the 19th century, the United States had surpassed Britain and France in industrial production at that time and became the world's largest industrial power. During World War II,At that time, Germany was on a rampage in Europe, trying to occupy Europe and dominate the world.

    No matter how strong Germany was at that time, in fact, its economy and strength could only rank second, and it was far from the United States, which was far from the first. However, in the face of the start of World War II, Germany continued to destroy countries in Europe, successively destroyed more than a dozen small countries, defeated France, and crippled Britain, which was very strong and endangered the security of the whole world. At that time, looking at the world, that is, the United States was able to suppress Germany in terms of national strength.

    So for the United States, on the one hand, it is strong, so powerful, but it still needs to recuperate. The reason why the United States is neutral is that it is preparing for war, first of all, it will continue to vigorously develop the economy and improve production in order to get out of the predicament of the economic crisis.

    Therefore, the United States did not participate in the war, but when other countries were engaged in wars, they still carried out their own economic construction and worked hard to develop their own countries for the development of science and technology, so after the war, the United States became the most developed country in the world.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-09

    Because the United States is a businessman, neutrality can sell equipment and resources to both sides of the participating countries, and then make a lot of war money, and neutrality is also a good choice to make money.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-08

    National interests come first, selling arms and supporting countries that are beneficial to their own interests. Once their own interests are harmed, they will come out to protect them.

  30. Anonymous users2024-01-07

    Taking the Pearl Harbor incident as the boundary, the United States seemed to be neutral before this, but in fact the two sides sold arms and made a lot of war money. After that, the United States declared war on Japan and fought Germany, which was no longer neutral, but to expand its sphere of influence.

  31. Anonymous users2024-01-06

    This is to sit on the mountain and watch the tiger fight, and when the other countries fight almost the same, they can sit back and reap the profits, leave this matter to me, and I will do the same.

Related questions
49 answers2024-02-09

Joining the United States in the German attack on the Soviet Union and Germany single-handedly, the United States only 30 percent of the chance to win, the German regular army has 2.5 million, the United States only a few hundred thousand, and the strategic perspective is more than 10 years apart, saying that the United States does not have armored troops to form the main force. Moreover, the United States attacked Germany in one direction and did not have the advantage of fighting on two sides, and the number of tanks was not as large as that of Germany, so the chances of the United States winning were slim...

9 answers2024-02-09

...First, World War II tanks were not air-conditioned, and they were very hot, and noisy, and if they were not combat, armored corps generally opened the hatches to breathe. >>>More

20 answers2024-02-09

Guderian. The defeat of the German army was reversed many times, and if it were not for Hitler's intervention in the front command, he would not have been so badly defeated.

3 answers2024-02-09

Toshiyoshi Ando, Ninji Okamura, Keihisa Suzuki.

Shigeru Fujita. Katsu Uesaka. >>>More

12 answers2024-02-09

Normandy landings! This is the so-called second battlefield! At that time, Germany's SEAL program failed, that is to say, the British air war failed, and Germany implemented the Barbarossa plan to attack the Soviet Union, leading to multilateral operations! >>>More