Was it a strategic mistake on the part of Japan during World War II that led to the defeat of the wa

Updated on military 2024-02-27
15 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    How to say that Japan's defeat is certainly inevitable! Whether he provokes the United States or not! Militarism is too aggressive, but it has too poor control over domestic development and stability.

    As far as Japan is concerned, it can be said that it has no choice but to start a war, and it must find a point of transfer in its internal contradictions. However, Japan's national strength is here, after all, the war depends on the ultimate national strength, Japan's military resources, strategic resources, depth, and even in military science and technology are not the opponents of the great powers (of course, it is still much stronger than China at that time), and in a short period of time, it is certainly possible to achieve victory with fanatical militarist sentiment and an attitude of not being afraid of death, but it will not be possible for the great powers to ease up and come to Japan. It is the same when it comes to fighting China, China's military strength will certainly not be comparable with Japan's, but China has the resources, the population, and the strategic depth, and it can drag Japan to death.

    This is the sorrow of a small land area! If Germany had the size and resources of China, I would not dare to imagine what Germany would become!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It is not a strategic mistake, but a war of aggression that is inherently wrong! The war itself was a crisis-shifting measure taken by Japan to resolve its own economic crisis. The war reduced the employment problem, and at the same time significantly reduced the population during the war.

    It can also accumulate a lot of wealth in a predatory way. Feeding the country with war is also ...... feeding the country with warFight to support the government!!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    After the Wise Restoration, Japan was actually gambling with its national fortunes.

    It's just that the previous bet was won.

    Whether it was the Sino-Japanese War, or the Russo-Japanese War.

    In fact, as long as Japan fails, it will be doomed.

    The Japanese navy was completely strong at the cost of the collapse of the domestic economy.

    But once lost in the war.

    Japan's economy will collapse completely.

    They used the war dividends from winning wars to compensate for the loss of their own domestic economy in preparation for war.

    This is actually similar to the outbreak of World War I.

    Both sides are engaged in an arms race in a way that upsets the economic balance of the country.

    If there is no war, everyone will go bankrupt.

    Fight a battle, and the winning side can get a bonus from the loser.

    And this mode of warfare and the line of development are in fact walking a tightrope.

    Japan's defeat was inevitable.

    Because this risky gambling can't last forever.

    Therefore, this kind of success and failure should not be said to have been conceived in the wise restoration.

    Rather, it is the inevitable result of the development of Japan's national strategy.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    First: the front was stretched too long, ** backward, there were too few submachine guns, and second: he provoked the wrong person, that is, the United States, and the entry of the United States into the war accelerated the demise of Japanese militarism, especially the last two atomic bombs.

    The stupidity of Japan's surprise attack on Pearl Harbor also hastened the demise of Hitler's Third Reich.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It can also be said that the main thing is the power gap, especially with the United States.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Japan's mistake was to start a war against the United States by slapping it in the face.

    Japan's plan was divided into two parts: the Army was primarily responsible for the occupation of Malaysia, Burma, Sumatra, and Luzon; The Navy attacked Pearl Harbor on Oahu and seized the Philippine Islands, Bismarck Islands, Java and other places. On the one hand, the plundering of the resources of these regions, on the other hand, turning the 2,500-year-old islands in the Pacific Ocean into a huge "unsinkable aircraft carrier", becoming a spectacular line of defense, and at the same time depriving the United States of naval and air bases in Asia, greatly reducing its military threat.

    Strategically speaking, if Japan relied on its superior air force at that time to coordinate operations with its navy and land forces and gradually implement this huge plan, it would inevitably fight a long-term war of attrition with the United States. Especially at that time, when the situation in Europe was tense and the United States did not want to stretch the front, there was even the possibility of reaching some kind of compromise.

    But Japan's stupidity lies in the "despicable" means of a sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, and for the United States, the crux of the matter is not that they lost some **, but that they lost face in front of the whole world, which greatly hurt their self-esteem.

    Originally, before this, the United States hoped for war, but many people in the country did not want to break the peaceful life, so the anti-war sentiment was very strong. After Pearl Harbor, the United States' hesitation to fight against Japan was swept away, and its full-scale entry into the war won the support of everyone in the country, and the United States was determined to win the war at all costs. This result was completely unforeseen by Japan, and the original wishful thinking turned into a real "death" Zhiling closure.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Japan's biggest mistake was to raise its head too high, forget what it is, and single-handedly take on the US imperialists. Not to mention blowing up the Pearl Harbor oil depot and shipyard, even on December 7, 1941, the Japanese army directly occupied Pearl Harbor was useless!

    A Japan, whose national strength is less than one-seventh of that of the United States, whose oil production capacity is only one-fifth of that of the United States, and whose steel is only one-twentieth of that of the United States, is several times that of the United States of America in almost any material imaginary of the United States, and that Japan would actually pull the giant of the United States imperialism into the battlefield is a pure act of suicide. It is a reckless speculative move to win luck, that is, knowing that the chances of winning are not big, but you want to gamble! Because I don't want to stop, since I don't want to stop, I will go straight to the battle, what if the US imperialists are soft and finally seek peace by war?

    The result was the opposite, the people were scattered, unwilling to go to war, and the giant, who was almost sleeping, finally stood up. Quietly Japan signed the book of life and death by the way! Together with the Axis powers, the Lian Raid Duan was brought into the abyss of no return.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Personally, I think that the reason for Germany's defeat should be said: it is unpopular with the people, the speed of the war is too fast, and the blitzkrieg has advantages and disadvantages;

    The biggest failure of the Empire was the attack on Pearl Harbor, which can be said to be unable to eat and walked around.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    From a military point of view, a two-front war is a taboo, and from a political point of view, an unjust war is bound to fail.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Japan's social system during World War II was relatively backward, which was one of the reasons for its defeat in the war. For example, Japan's feudal ideology and bushido spirit limited its development of modernization. Japan's political system is also characterized by serious corruption and unfairness, which has greatly affected its domestic stability.

    During World War II, although Japan made certain achievements in some fields, it was still far inferior to the United States and other allies in terms of overall economic strength. In the early days of the war, Japan had an advantage in Asia with its strong naval and air forces, but as the war continued, Japan's economic power gradually weakened and it was unable to compete with the Allies. The Allies, on the other hand, were able to make full use of their strong industrial strength and resource advantages, continuously strengthening their equipment and military strength, and finally overwhelmed Japan.

    To sum up, there were many reasons for Japan's defeat in World War II, the most important of which was its lack of economic strength and improper military strategy. The backwardness of its social system is also one of the important reasons for its failure. Combined, these factors ultimately led to Japan's defeat in the war.

    Japan adopted some inappropriate military tactics in World War II, which made its war situation more difficult. For example, Japan's failure to completely destroy U.S. naval and air forces during its attack on Pearl Harbor ultimately led to its disadvantage in the Pacific War. Japan also resorted to excessively brutal warfare methods in Asia, which made its image extremely bad among the local population and deepened the hostility of the Allies.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The international situation is very complex, and countries have different strategic interests in different years. 1937 is right, of course, when has offended the Soviet Union, but the development of the navy has also been a huge investment, the strategic center of gravity back to the army is a little difficult, the key point is to make the bald head yield and at the same time to achieve it before the United States enters the war, because Chinese mainland does not conquer, land traffic is completely separated from Southeast Asia, wartime is very troublesome, the rest are secondary goals. The United States will definitely go to war with Japan, and it is a matter of time, and the ultimate goal of Japan's strategy is to dominate East Asia and the Western Pacific, and it will rely on its air force on the road to confront the US navy and air force, and it will not be able to fight out of the Pacific Ocean and the islands of Southeast Asia.

    As long as there is no ocean and land transportation, the oil problem should not be large, so it can compete with the United States for a long time. Stalin of the Soviet Union was a villain and was completely unreliable, if Japan could get rid of the bald head, Taizu would not be a problem, and all the remaining forces would strengthen the Northeast Army and fight a decisive battle with the Soviet Union in the Far East in the long run.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Hitting the United States and the USSR must have been a big mistake.

    It is right to fight the Indochina peninsula, there is rubber, although it will offend Britain and France, but they are not very strong and can only focus on Europe. There is also a premise that China is hit first.

    Hitting the Philippines is equivalent to hitting the United States, it can't.

    From the standpoint of Japan, it is right to fight China! The strength is poor and there are many resources, and they occupied the Northeast and Taiwan earlier, so they are used to fighting, and they will not fight for nothing. If you don't make a fool and make enemies with the Soviet Union, you have to send heavy troops to defend the northeast, and after you fight Pearl Harbor, you have to divide your troops to the Pacific Ocean, take Sichuan Yungui, and kill the bald headmaster.

    And to concentrate on fighting China, there is no need to vigorously develop the navy, if half of the resources for building ** are pumped to the army, then it will be more comfortable to fight!

    If the so-called people's war is difficult to deal with, it is only a matter of time, when the Qing Dynasty ceded Taiwan, the Taiwanese were also very troublesome, and after twenty or thirty years, they did not obey the same, and after the Qing army entered the customs, it was nothing more than that. It is also possible for the Japanese to stay for decades.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Judging by the results, China and the United States must have made a mistake.

    The words of the Soviet Union at that time were a matter of history, and it was impossible to say whether it was right or wrong.

    The Indochina Peninsula and the Philippines, Japan has benefited, and it should be right.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    There are no mistakes in grand strategy. Japan's top brass knows that because Japan's moves in Asia have seriously damaged US interests, the United States will intervene sooner or later or even go to war.

    However, Japan made serious mistakes in its military strategy, such as employing personnel. The appointment of Nagumo Tadaichi is a tragedy.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    It was wrong to offend the United States by attacking Pearl Harbor, it was wrong to garrison troops in northeast China and threaten the Soviet Union, and it was wrong to offend the two great powers of the United States and the Soviet Union.

Related questions
22 answers2024-02-27

Let's analyze the strength of Japan during World War II from various aspects. >>>More

17 answers2024-02-27

Beat it. But at a great cost. The United States can be stronger than Germany and Japan because of the huge scale of its industry. >>>More

8 answers2024-02-27

Germany didn't know that at that time. Japan had already planned to attack the United States, and Germany knew about it, but all along, Germany had been vigorously opposed to Japan's attack on the United States, because the United States' participation in the war at that time was likely to directly reverse the situation of the war that was originally biased in their favor, and moreover, Japan at that time did not conquer China within a month as it had planned, and the war situation in East Asia was still unclear, and if the United States got involved, it would inevitably suffer from the enemy, so Germany has always opposed Japan's sneak attack on the United States in this regard. However, the Japanese emperor at that time seemed to have seen the defeat of the war and lost confidence in the war, so with their national character, they had to fight to the death. >>>More

16 answers2024-02-27

In the Battle of the Coral Sea, Shozuru Zuzuru was injured and was unable to participate in Midway. >>>More

20 answers2024-02-27

The battleships of the Japanese devils did not have anti-aircraft artillery fire, they relied on aircraft carrier escorts, they did not need air defense, four huge guns in the bow, four guns in a salvo, high hit rate, maneuverable, unlike the American battleship with huge guns on the side of the ship, firing with a single gun, very bad, not at all a Japanese opponent,. The Japanese Navy is very strong, very bull,. Japan does not have grenades, mines, anti-aircraft machine guns, anti-aircraft guns, because the Japanese devils do not need these superfluous **, the Japanese devils are very bullish,. >>>More