Why was Kong Rong of Rang Pear executed by Cao Cao, is it really because of unfilial piety ?

No, Kong Rong is talented, has a big reputation, and has a straightforward personality, Kong Rong saw Cao Cao's treacherous personality, and he was against Cao Cao in many things, Cao Cao was jealous of him on the one hand, and on the other hand, he was afraid that he would hinder his great cause, so in the end, he couldn't bear it anymore and sentenced Kong Rongan to death.

Kong Rong saw Cao Cao's treacherous and cunning side, and became more and more unbearable, so when facing Cao Cao, his words were always a little extreme, which angered Cao Cao, and was finally killed by Cao Cao, not because of his unfilial piety.

Because Cao Cao was a particularly suspicious person, Kong Rong was executed mainly because of Xi Xu's false accusations.

Kong Rong let everyone know the story of his pear, Kong Rong let the pear leave people with the image of his kind character and respect for his brother since childhood. How could such a person be killed by Cao Cao for unfilial piety and treason?

Speaking of Kong Rong's killing, Kong Rong has to be said to be arrogant and arrogant, ignorant of current affairs, empty-eyed, not good at communicating, doing things, and not knowing the way of being an official, although as a literati, he is only able to learn and be stable, and is quite familiar with the ancient statecraft and education policy.

Things have to start with Yuan Shu being the emperor, Yuan Shu said that the emperor had a big blow to Cao Cao, and Cao Cao couldn't annihilate it for a while, and there was nowhere to put the anger in his heart, so he vented his anger on Yang Biao, the Taiwei who married Yuan Shu. After Kong Rong heard about it, he looked for Cao Cao's theory, and Kong Rong quoted ancient allusions to Cao Cao's speechlessness, but Cao Cao let Yang Biao go.

Since Kong Rong single-handedly prevented Cao Cao from killing Yang Biao, he has been even more carried away and often contradicts Cao Cao.

After pacifying the north, Cao Cao ordered a southern expedition to prepare for a crusade against Liu Bei, Liu Biao, Sun Quan, and others. Kong Rong tried his best to dissuade him, and his words were strong, first saying that Liu Bei and Liu Biao were relatives of the Han family and could not be crusaded; He also said that Sun Quanhu Jiangdong was not easy to attack; even bluntly said that if you attack it, it will be a teacher who is unrighteous and will lose the people's popularity. Cao Cao didn't know what to do, and Cao Cao finally couldn't bear to rebuke Kong Rong.

The relationship between Cao Cao and Kong Rong has been inextricably linked, Cao Cao also heard that Kong Rong was arrogant and sarcastic at the bottom, Cao Cao was angry and found someone to collect Kong Rong's arrogant words and put Kong Rong to death.

Kong Rong's death was his own death, arrogant, ignorant of self-reflection, and against those in power, who would die if he didn't die?

Kong Rong was killed by Cao Cao, but not because of unfilial piety.

When Cao Cao was fighting Wuhuan in the north, Kong Rong ridiculed him and said: "The general (Cao Cao) went on an expedition, depressed overseas, and was cautious not to pay tribute to Mu Kuya, and Ding Ling stole Su Wu's cattle and sheep, and he could crusade together!" At that time, when the famine and war were raging, Cao Cao asked for a ban on alcohol, and Kong Rong wrote to Cao Cao many times, thinking that he should not ban alcohol, and his words were mostly arrogant and rude.

Kong Rong had already seen Cao Cao's treachery and treachery, which had gradually been revealed, and he became more and more unbearable, so he spoke radically and often offended Cao Cao. He once thought that the system of the ancient Jingshi should be followed, and feudal princes should not be allowed within a thousand miles. Cao Cao suspected that he was talking more and more and was more afraid of him.

However, because Kong Rong is famous all over the world, he pretends to be tolerant on the surface, but secretly he is jealous of his correct discussion, for fear of hindering his great cause.

Over time, Cao Cao was full of suspicion and jealousy, coupled with the false accusations of others, Cao Cao instructed the prime minister's army to plot to sacrifice wine and play Kong Rong in vain on charges of "recruiting the disciples", "trying to misbehave", "slandering the court", and "not complying with the etiquette", and executed Kong Rong on August 29, the thirteenth year of Jian'an.

I remember that I learned the story of "Kong Rong Makes Pears" in primary school textbooks, and taught us to develop the fine tradition of filial piety from an early age with the story of "Rong is four years old, and can make pears". It can be said that Kong Rong when he was a child was a model of filial piety for us. So, why was Kong Rong executed for the crime of unfilial piety when he grew up?

Kong Rong is famous for his rare talents and diligence and studiousness, but as an adult, Kong Rong has become uninhibited and often does some deviant things. Because he spoke excisely, he often offended Cao Cao. Cao Cao was afraid that the content of Kong Rong's current affairs was becoming more and more presumptuous, and he pretended to be tolerant on the surface, but secretly he was jealous of him, worried that Kong Rong's existence would hinder his great cause, and he wanted to get rid of it quickly, but he was afraid that Kong Rong would be famous in the world, so he did not dare to start easily.

Later, Cao Cao finally found Kong Rong's "death certificate" - the sin is unfilial!

Kong Rong actually doesn't have any talent, making pears when he was a child is a trivial matter, in fact, many children have done it, it's nothing. In ancient times, it was normal to pay attention to humility and filial piety. When Kong Rong became an adult, he could write good articles, and he was also very good at talking and had good eloquence.

Unfortunately, that's all. Kong Rong lacked military and political ability.

But, then again, there is no excuse for the crime you want to add, Boss Cao is determined to kill you, Kong Rong, you are a fish on the chopping board, what else can you do, if you think Kong Rong is not filial and killed, it is underestimating Kong Rong. If you think that Kong Rong was killed because of her indiscriminate speech, you are underestimating Cao Cao. In fact, the killing and being killed between politicians is always the reason for the position.

In the final analysis, Kong Rong's killing was another challenge from Cao Cao to the clan gatekeeper.

History has to be viewed from different angles, and it is generally written by the victors. The simplest and most straightforward reason is that Kong Rong blocked Cao Cao's path. In that era, there was no shortage of sages and saints, and now we see that Kong Rong is a sage, and he is a warlord in the late Eastern Han Dynasty, and he is the same kind of person as Cao Cao in this regard, and he has the political desire to dominate the world.

He failed and was killed.

Children's thoughts are like the clear spring of the beginning, down and into the rivers and lakes, the rivers and lakes are sinister and will be affected by it, and the quality of the solid goodness is also mutated.

Because of Kong Rong as an adult, he himself is arrogant and uninhibited, and often does some illegal things, and Cao Cao is also very jealous of Kong Rong, so he will seize his handle and kill him.

Because let the pear is real, and killing the mother is also a real thing. In ancient times, no matter what the reason for hurting relatives, they had to resist their lives.

According to the 262nd quote of "Qin Zi" in the "Imperial Review", it is recorded: "Kong Wenju is the Beihai Minister, and he was mourned by his father, crying on the side of the tomb, and his color is not haggard, and Wenju kills him." ”

As an adult, Kong Rong was uninhibited and often did some deviant things. Kong Rong opposed Cao Cao's political line and preached the invincibility of the enemy. Because he spoke excipiously, he often offended Cao Cao.

However, Cao Cao was afraid that the content of Kong Rong's current affairs was becoming more and more presumptuous, and he pretended to be tolerant on the surface, but secretly he was jealous of him, worried that Kong Rong's existence would hinder his great cause, and wanted to get rid of it quickly, but he was afraid that Kong Rong's reputation was important in the world, so he didn't dare to start easily. In the end, Cao Cao finally found Kong Rong's "death certificate" - the sin is unfilial!

Because Cao Cao felt that Kong Rong was particularly talented, and Cao Cao thought that he would be a stumbling block for himself in the future, so he killed him.

Kong Rong opposed Cao Cao's political line and preached the invincibility of the enemy.

Kong Rong proposed that Qianli Bu Feng Hou was more aimed at Cao Cao.

Kong Rong is arrogant, often gets carried away, and does not take Cao Cao in his eyes.

Because his thoughts were inconsistent with Cao Cao, some of the things he said were not recognized by Cao Cao, and they also had an impact on Cao Cao's status.

It's true, as the head of the family, when others hit the door of his house, he actually abandoned his wife and son and ran away by himself, and was finally caught by Cao Cao and killed in the name of unfilial piety.

This has nothing to do with "unfilial piety", it is a political means, and his existence hinders Cao Cao's regime, but he cannot be executed for fair reasons, so he can only find such an excuse.

Kong Rong, who knew how to make pears at the age of seven, was finally killed by Cao Cao on charges of unfilial piety because he abandoned his wife and children during the war.

This is just a crime that Cao Cao gave Kong Rong'an, Cao Cao wanted to kill Kong Rong, so he gave him a trumped-up charge of unfilial piety, and then killed him.

Kong Rong didn't give Cao Cao face at all, and replied to several letters in a row, so that Cao Cao couldn't come to the stage, which was very embarrassing. That's why Cao Cao gave him such a charge, not because he was unfilial.

Although Kong Rong knew how to make pears at the age of seven, he abandoned his wife and children during the war, so he was killed by Cao Cao on charges of unfilial piety.

Of course not, it's just an excuse for Cao Cao to kill him. But it was indeed because Kong Rongyan was arrogant and arrogant that Cao Cao decided to kill him.

Because Kong Rong was arrogant and arrogant, Cao Cao had already had the intention of killing him, and when he found an opportunity, he was accused of unfilial piety and killed him.

Kong Rong was not killed by Cao Cao because of his unfilial piety.

Cao Cao was full of suspicion and jealousy, coupled with Xi Xian's false accusations, Cao Cao then instructed the prime minister's army to plot to sacrifice wine and play Kong Rong in vain on charges of "recruiting the disciples", "trying to do wrong", "slandering the court", "not complying with the etiquette" and other crimes, and executed Kong Rong on August 29, the thirteenth year of Jian'an (September 26, 208), and connected the whole family, Kong Rong was fifty-six years old at the time.

Before, Jingzhao was accustomed to being good with Kong Rong, and had admonished Kong Rong for being too upright. When Kong Rong was killed, no one in Xuchang dared to collect the body for him, and Zhi Xi went to care for the corpse and said: "Wenju left me dead, and I will no longer live."

Cao Cao was furious when he heard this, and was ready to arrest and kill Fat Xi, but was later released after pardoning.

Yes, Cao Cao was already full of suspicion and jealousy of Kong Rong, coupled with Xi Xi's false accusation, Cao Cao then instructed the prime minister's army to plot to sacrifice wine in vain Kong Rong for "recruiting the disciples", "trying to do wrong", "slandering the court", "not complying with the etiquette" and other crimes, Kong Rong and his whole family were all executed, Kong Rong was 56 years old at the time.

It's true.

Kong Rong (153 September 26, 208): Ziwenju. A native of Lu (now Qufu, Shandong).

He was a writer in the late Eastern Han Dynasty and one of the "Seven Sons of Jian'an", the 19th grandson of Confucius, the 7th grandson of Kong Ba, and the son of Kong Zhou, the commander of Taishan. Family learning origin, few talents, diligent and studious, and plain Tao Qiuhong, Chen Liubian and called handsome. After Emperor Xian of the Han Dynasty ascended the throne, he served as the Marquis of the Northern Army, the general of the Tiger Ben, and the minister of the Beihai, and was called Kong Beihai at the time.

In office for six years, he repaired the city, established a school, raised talents, showed Confucianism, and was recommended by Liu Bei and led the history of Qingzhou Thorn. In the first year of Jian'an (196), Yuan Tan attacked Beihai, and Kong Rong fought fiercely with him for several months, and finally fled to Shandong. Soon, he was recruited by the imperial court as a master craftsman, moved to Shaofu, and served as a doctor in Taizhong.

He was a good guest, liked to discuss current affairs, and his rhetoric was fierce, and he was later killed by Cao Cao because he angered him.

Kong Rongneng is good at poetry and writing, and Cao Pi called his text "Yang (Yangxiong), Ban (Bangu) and Yiye." The prose is sharp and concise, and his masterpiece is "Recommending You to Weigh the Table", whose six-character poems reflect the reality of the turmoil in the late Han Dynasty. The original anthology has been dispersed, and the Ming man Zhang Pu has compiled "Kong Beihai Collection".

Everyone should know Kong Rong, right? The story of Kong Rong Rang Pear is also enduring and has now become a etiquette used to educate children to learn humility. There are also people who say that Kong Rong is not filial, do you think it is possible?

Where does this come from? The most famous writer in the history of our country, the first of the seven sons of Jian'an, how could he bear the name of unfilial piety? Let's take a look at the reason for this site together!

The first of the seven sons of Jian'an - Kong Rong Kong Rong (153 A.D. 208 A.D.), one of the famous writers in the late Eastern Han Dynasty, the first of the seven sons of Jian'an, was gifted since he was a child, diligent and studious, and was the twentieth generation of Confucius's descendants. The story of Kong Rong making pears happened when he was 4 years old, and Kong Rong's unfilial piety was just a crime imposed on him by Cao Cao. Let's take a look at the specific story.

The story of Kong Rong Rang Pear

The story of Kong Rong making pears happened when he was only 4 years old, and one day Kong Rong's father's friend brought a plate of pears for Kong Rong's brothers to eat. The father asked Kong Rong to divide the pears, Kong Rong picked the youngest pear, and the rest were distributed to the brothers in the order of eldest and youngest. Kong Rong said

I'm young, so I should eat small pears and give big pears to my brothers. When my father heard this, he was very surprised, and asked, "That brother is also younger than you?"

Kong Rong said: "Because my younger brother is younger than me, I should also let him." The story of Kong Rong rang pear, and soon this rock burned throughout the Han Dynasty.

Xiao Kongrong has also become a good example for many parents to educate their children. After reading this story, I found that he was not the head of the seven sons of Jian'an, and he had a humble etiquette since he was a child. How could he, who is so smart and humble, be accused of unfilial piety?

We're moving on.

Kong Rong is not filial

Kong Rong is not filial, and it is generally unbelievable to see such a statement, because as we all know, when he was four years old, he would let Kong Rong pear, respect for the old and love for the young to the fullest, so why is Kong Rong unfilial? In fact, the reason why Kong Rong's unfilial remarks appeared was because of some of Kong Rong's words, Kong Rong once said some views on the relationship between father and son, mother and son, and the main idea is that the relationship between father and son, mother and son is not so important, and filial piety does not need to be too much. Because of this sentence, Kong Rong's unfilial remarks were raised.

But some people say that this is not that Kong Rong is not filial, but that Kong Rong has questioned the filial piety of foolishness.