What do you think of the online remarks about not having children if you don t have money?

The reason why there is a saying on the Internet that you don't want to have children if you don't have money is also because people are under too much pressure now, and the burden of having children is heavier.

If you say that you have children without a good economic foundation, then there will definitely be various quarrels between the husband and wife after marriage, which is not beneficial to the growth of children.

I think don't have children if you don't have money, this sentence is also 10 points correct, because if we want to have children, we must have a certain economic foundation, and we must have the ability to educate him well.

For children, perhaps the love and companionship of parents is the most important, but sometimes if there is no money, the child is not fed and clothed, is it to ask such parents to be patient? When we give birth to a child, we must be responsible for the child, and we must let the child come to the world to receive a good education and enjoy the love of the parents for him.

Many couples think that the financial situation is not good and they can work togetherBut how many couples are able to work together after getting married? It's very little. When facing money after marriage, there will inevitably be all kinds of contradictions, if there are contradictions will quarrel, then quarrel every day, children grow up in this environment, can they have a good future?

If you don't have money, don't have children is not a wrong theory, anyone has the right to have children, whether you are poor or rich, as long as you reach the legal childbearing age, you can have children, but under what kind of economic situation it is a person's choice to have children.

I believe that if you want to give your children a better life, you must have a certain financial abilityUnder the ability to create a good living and educational environment for children, it is responsible for the children and both husband and wife to choose to have children.

I think this question is the most qualified for those who are not very good at home, how to look at it is a personal idea, as far as I am concerned, I very much agree with this view, you can think that marriage should have children, you can also think that having children must be a responsible thing, but in this society, no money to have children is a big burden, for you, your quality of life will directly decline, for children, his quality of life is not very good, The child is not your personal accessory, he is a thinking person, so he will have his own interests and hobbies, he will also have his own interpersonal interactions, although it is not mandatory that every family should be able to afford these consumption, but now people's lives are getting better and better, the level of consumption is getting higher and higher, the future people are constantly improving ideologically and economically, if everyone of the same age can own a car, he does not have his own money to buy a good toy, It's actually very shocking. <>

It's not that the poor can't educate their children, but there are some gaps in the ideology itself, I can't say that every poor person is like this, but most people's thoughts are linked to his economic conditions, many children with poor family conditions have experienced wanting to have a toy that looks good but is a luxury, and they don't even dare to talk to the family, or it's a small hobby but they don't even have the money to get started with this hobby, for some of them, They don't want their children to follow their own path, so they also belong to the faction of no money and no children.

I have seen an old woman with three children picking up garbage on the side of the road, these three children look very innocent, they are very comfortable picking up garbage, now they don't know what others will look at them in the future, look at the new clothes on their bodies, you can infer that they may never go to school, maybe they may not even have been exposed to books, I know people will say, "How do you know that they are unhappy?" "What if you don't study, as long as your heart isn't bad", but is it really that simple?

The contempt and ridicule given to them by the outside world is something they can never resist, and after they realize their determination, they will feel inferior or even angry, and this is a kind of sadness, but can you sarcastically say that this woman should not have children, obviously not.

For today's young people, I believe that most people are more inclined to have children after having a certain financial strength, because this is not only responsible for your future life, but also responsible for the future of the individual - his future life, with a good family environment, his thinking and character will be better, which is also a kind of responsibility.

Let's put it this way, I think that it is the power of married couples to have children or not, not the power of the Internet, and we should put the role of the Internet into perspective. Let's take the question of whether to have children or notIs there a right or wrong way to have children or not?

Does it mean that not having children must be wrong? Some people will say that if everyone does not have children, then the human race will not be extinct? And you can't deprive your child of the right to be born because of your own selfish thoughts.

I think this statement is an extremely alarmist statement. Let's analyze them one by one.

First of all, it is the right of married couples to have children or not, and outsiders have no right to decide. However, you must know that people and people's ideas are different, some people like babies, they like to see the continuation of their bloodline, there are not a few people who have such thoughts, so I don't think it will involve the continuation of the race. But some people think that if you can't give your child the best life, you shouldn't have a baby, is this thinking necessarily wrong?

Secondly, when our parents chose to give birth to us, they naturally did their best to give us the best life. Is it necessarily wrong for some people to think that they can't afford to take on such responsibilities? Do you have to do a task that you can't complete in order to prove your strength?

I don't think that's the case, human beings have an innate instinct to avoid risks, and that's not a mistake, right? It's just that different people have different views on the same issue.

In the end, it is only the right of both husband and wife to have children or not, it is not easy for every couple who gives birth to a baby, they are doing their best to bring the best life to their children, such parents are great. But it is also true that after giving birth to a baby, the quality of life of the baby cannot be guaranteed. It can only be said that different people have different abilities, but it is not possible to say that others are wrong and you are right because of such things, everyone has their own way of choosing their own life.

Nowadays, there are many young couples who do not choose to have children after marriage, but to be dink, which is not an exception, but a universal status quo. And the most critical factor why they do not choose to raise children is that they do not have money. In my opinion, this is not a kind of spit in the mouth of young people, but a practical situation, every parent should carefully ask themselves if they are ready before choosing to have a child, I remember someone once made such a statistic, from the birth of a child to the marriage of a child, these 20 years need at least 1 million expenditures, and in today's society, I think this number is far from enough.

Because the expenditure in all aspects is somewhat **, especially in the issue of children's education, it is necessary to spend more financial resources. So there is no way to give the child a better living space, simply not having a child has become a correct choice, and after the parents give birth to a child, basically the trajectory of their life has changed, and all their focus is on the child, so after having a child, this is even more torture for the couple.

The reason why many couples divorce a few years after marriage is not because of the fact that two people betray their feelings, but because they are exhausted by firewood, rice, oil and salt every day. Instead of becoming a pull in their love, the child became the culpritTherefore, couples who choose a two-person world are often more able to maintain a long and happy married life.

In the early 90s, an authoritative survey was conducted in the United States, and nearly half of all young people who married did not choose to have children. Therefore, today we are more like a precursor to a developed country, because of the advance of thought. Therefore, in the future, more and more young people will choose to be dink, and in the future, when they gradually enter an aging society, most parents will also become a member of the nursing home, even if the parents with children will eventually end up here.

I think it's right, if you don't have money, your child will have a hard time, so it's better not to have children.

It is our own right to have children or not, and most people want their children to have good living conditions, but this is not a reason to deny the right to have children.

In fact, this is an evasive statement. What does it mean to have no money, and what does it mean to have money. First of all, we must determine where is the line between rich and unrich? Did your family have money when they gave birth to you?

I think everyone has their own opinions, but it's true that if you don't have the ability to raise children, it's better not to think about it.

What do you think of the online remarks about not having children if you don't have money? Personal opinion: the poor have the poor, the rich have the rich. But at least food and clothing can be guaranteed. Poverty does not deprive a family of the right to have children.

1. Measuring the baseline of having money, many people say that if you don't have money, don't have children, and children will also suffer when they come out. But how rich do you have to be to have children? If in a poor area, there is a deposit of 230,000 yuan, it is enough.

Put it in a first-tier city, and you have to add a zero to it. So, according to the environment you are in, calculate your current savings and future income, and if you can live your life, then give birth.

2. The poor have the poor and the rich are rich. If you don't have diamonds, don't do porcelain work. Some people have to slap their swollen faces and become fat, superficial and beautiful, and incur debts everywhere.

If the conditions are not good, others give the child to drink imported milk powder, and you can choose domestic milk powder. When others buy imported bottles, you can choose domestic bottles. Others buy designer clothes, you can choose comfortable and unbranded products.

In short, you don't need to pursue grade in everything. In this society, not everyone can be among the upper class, and not every child can be born with a golden key. Parents do their best to create good conditions for their children while ensuring that their children are fed and clothed, and the wealth that follows needs to be created by the children themselves.

3. No one can deprive others of their right to have children. I don't approve of verbal criticism of having children without money, because everyone has the right to choose to have children. However, I must disapprove of the kind of parents who give birth but do not raise.

Children come into the world without choice, and if parents abandon their children because of their own sloppiness and irresponsibility, then this kind of behavior is too inhumane.

When a child comes into this world, he can experience a variety of different lives, and there are infinite possibilities, so why not let him have the opportunity to come into the world? If money is used to measure the standard of life, it can only be said that such a person himself looks at money. It is also possible that the clan Sakura Kuan can't bear the child's suffering, and feels that he has to give the child all the best.

I think it's very correct, if the world returns to only give birth but can't afford to raise it, it will only make the child very hungry and hungry, and he won't feel happy, and his family will not feel happy, so if you don't have money, it's best not to have children.

Such a statement is indeed not particularly good, but although this statement is very realistic, it is indeed very correct, and it is also a problem in the current society.

I think this is particularly correct, and it is also very normal, many families are reluctant to have children, because there is no good economic pressure in the family, and they are afraid that they will not be able to give their children a good and pure life, which is the responsibility of parents.

I don't agree with this statement, and I don't feel like I'm talking about the town, and I feel like I'm really looking for a reason. But if you don't have money, you won't have a good life, and you can't give your children some good food and clothing. Maybe it's because I don't want my children to suffer, so I say that.

I think this statement is a bit inappropriate, but it is indeed a phenomenon that exists in society, and it is very likely that you will not be able to raise children without money, and the pressure is too great.

Agree, now the economic pressure is too great, and I don't have the strength to raise a child, so let's work hard to make money for the next generation.

This remark is very normal, because people nowadays have too much pressure in life, and it costs a lot to raise a child, if you have enough savings, don't have a child for the time being, otherwise after the child is born, his starting point will be lower than others.