Isn t a Kodak digital camera bad?

Updated on number 2024-02-27
6 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Kodak's camera is very good, it is estimated that only Nikon and Canon can be compared, Sony is a model, other brands are at least one grade lower than these four brands, I have been buying the current C713 from 2005 C310, which has also bought Z700, it is not broken, the effect is all good, now my mom and dad have a one, I use Z700 myself

    The reason why Kodak is cheap is because Kodak opened its factory in China relatively early, and cost control has certain advantages, but Kodak's advertising strategy has made mistakes, especially the original 100 yuan to buy a point-and-shoot camera and send film, which left many people with the illusion of a cheap camera. I once compared it with my classmate's Nikon, Kodak's granularity is slightly heavier after too much magnification, but it is perfect under the original size, Nikon's is a little foggy whether it is magnified or not, the outdoor effect is comparable to Kodak, and the Kodak effect is obviously much better under low-light conditions indoors.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It can be said very responsibly that Kodak is not bad, everyone is right, but Kodak is very good.

    Others, Canon, Fuji, Nikon are all brands with good picture quality, Sony, Oba, Casio and other brands can be said to be inferior to these few, they are all model goods, if you still buy famous brand old factories, the technology is excellent.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Kodak also belongs to the brand, each camera is different, sure its function and material will be different, no matter how big the brand of products, it will have good and bad, take Nokia mobile phone as an example, this is a big brand, its products are not very expensive, there are also hundreds of fast money at a price, to meet the needs of consumers of all grades. It depends on what price point and features you buy.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    After the camera industry entered the digital age from film, the former giant Kodak was a little slow to respond, lagging behind its Japanese counterparts, such as Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus, Ricoh, etc.

    In fact, Kodak's camera is not bad, but it is a little backward in terms of technology and other aspects, and the advertising is not very satisfactory, so now the popularity and market response are not ideal.

    Now Kodak is restructuring and entering the digital imaging industry in full.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Hello, I am happy to serve you and give you the following answer: The higher the number of Kodak C series cameras, the better, because the higher the number, the higher the quality of the image captured, and the clearer the image captured. Workaround:

    1.First of all, you need to determine your own needs and choose the right Kodak C-series camera according to your needs, the higher the number, the higher the quality of the image captured, and the clearer the image captured by the dust cover. 2.

    Secondly, it is necessary to understand the features of Kodak C series cameras, such as shooting mode, ** mode, white balance, etc., which will affect the image quality of shooting. 3.Finally, it is important to choose the right Kodak C-series camera according to your needs, the higher the number, the higher the quality of the images captured, and the clearer the images captured.

    Personal Tips:1When choosing a Kodak C series camera, you should choose the right number according to your needs, the larger the pure number, the higher the quality of the image captured, and the clearer the image captured.

    2.Learn about the features of Kodak C-Series cameras, such as shooting mode, ** mode, white balance, etc., which can affect the image quality of the shot. 3.

    Try to choose a higher number Kodak C-series camera to get sharper images.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Hello, the reason for the success and failure of Kodak's camera is that Kodak's success comes from change, it is its own change, making the clumsy and cumbersome camera more lightweight and simple, around this point, and then running all the way to become the biggest winner in the camera industry of the last century. And Kodak's failure is also due to changes, changes in the market, and he is still addicted to yesterday's glory, so that he delays the fighter plane and can no longer keep up with the changes of this era. Founded in 1880, Kodak is engaged in imaging equipment, infrastructure, services and media related to information imaging.

    Kodak has always been committed to providing customers with innovative products and services to meet consumer demand for the rich information contained in images. It is precisely by virtue of its technological advantages, market size and many industry partnerships that Kodak once became the world's largest manufacturer and supplier of finished imaging products and related services.

Related questions
7 answers2024-02-27

So what kind of lamp is magnesium?

8 answers2024-02-27

I recommend you to check out the Casio H10, I was paying attention to it some time ago. >>>More

7 answers2024-02-27

These two models are similar in style and performance, but the L201 was launched early and has been discontinued, so it is recommended to choose the L301.

6 answers2024-02-27

The actual phase is standard, i.e., 320*240. Since the CMOS used by mobile phones is interpolated, it is claimed that the number of thousands of phases is not helpful in nature, but only to enlarge the photo. But the phase is still so big, so the bigger it is, the more blurry it is.

11 answers2024-02-27

Canon, Nikon first-line brands, each series has outstanding, Sony Casio Kodak Ricoh and other second-line brands, you can consider a certain model with characteristics that match your needs. Personally, I tend to be Canon, Nikon.