In layman s terms, constitutional monarchy and federalism are explained

Constitutional monarchy, monarchy, and federalism are three different state systems.

1.Constitutional monarchy: The power of the monarch is limited by the enactment of a constitution on the premise of retaining the monarchy. Under this system, although the monarch is the head of state, he is not directly involved in political decision-making, but the parliament and cabinet are responsible for the actual political management.

2.Monarchy: The head of state is the monarch who has actual political power and exercises direct rule over the country.

3.Federalism: It is a form of state structure in which the member states of the federation retain a certain degree of autonomy while ceding part of the state power to the federation** in order to achieve the development and unity of the country as a whole.

Under this system, the states can have their own legal systems and administrative bodies, but the supreme power of the state remains with the federal government.

There are differences between a parliamentary constitutional monarchy and a constitutional monarchy in terms of the way they are organized, the conditions for their formation, and the establishment of a head of state. The details are as follows:

1. Different ways of organization.

A parliamentary democratic republic is a form of political organization in which the parliament is the center of the country's political activities, and the organs of state power and the head of state are elected by the parliament and are responsible to the parliament. A parliamentary constitutional monarchy is a form of political organization in which a hereditary monarch is the head of state, but its powers are stipulated by the constitution and subject to certain restrictions.

2. The conditions are different.

A parliamentary democratic republic was the result of a more thorough bourgeois revolution, while a parliamentary constitutional monarchy was the product of a compromise between the bourgeoisie and the feudal forces.

3. The election of a head of state is different from the term of office.

A parliamentary constitutional monarchy has a monarch as the head of state, which is hereditary succession, has no term limit, and is lifelong. A parliamentary democratic republic, on the other hand, does not have a monarch, and the head of state is elected for a certain term.

One is that the monarch says it doesn't count, and the other is that the monarch has the final say.

In the simplest terms, to limit the rights of the emperor.

Summary. Generally speaking, a parliamentary constitutional monarchy is not much different from a constitutional monarchy, which uses parliament to restrain the monarch and achieve the goal of not acting arbitrarily. However, the German constitutional monarchy is different, because the German constitutional monarchy is only superficial, the parliamentary power is very small, and the monarch is still dominant.

Hello, I have seen your question and am looking for relevant information, please wait a moment Parliamentary constitutional monarchy is generally not much different from the constitutional monarchy, the constitutional monarchy is to use parliament to restrain the monarch, to achieve the purpose of eliminating the dust and not being arbitrary. However, the German constitutional monarchy is different, because the German constitutional monarchy is only superficial, the parliamentary power is very small, and the monarch is still dominant.

I hope mine can be helpful to you, if you still have any questions, you can continue to ask me, dear.

Generally speaking, the parliamentary constitutional monarchy is not much different from the constitutional monarchy, and the constitutional monarchy is originally to use the parliament to restrain the monarch and achieve the goal of eliminating the dust and not being arbitrary. However, the German constitutional monarchy is different, because the German constitutional monarchy is only superficial, the parliamentary power is very small, and the monarch is still dominant.

Take the example of Britain, a typical constitutional monarchy, the bourgeois revolution in Britain.

It was done through the so-called "Glorious Revolution".

From this point of view, the British capitalist system.

At the same time, the British constitutional monarchy was also established.

But globally, constitutional monarchies are just some capitalist countries.

The form of organization of the regime.

The establishment of the capitalist system of dominance was marked by the victory of the bourgeois revolution.

Not all countries have adopted a constitutional monarchy to complete the bourgeois revolution and to achieve the victory of the bourgeois revolution.