The Internet is more about helping students learn on Debate Contest Topic 20

Students' attitudes towards the web.

You're a college student, is this still stumping you?

The good thing about networking is that there is no limit to communication and the time is fast.

The online quiz can help a lot of people solve their problems.

Especially our group of college students who need knowledge.

The Internet provides us with a place to learn, and our book knowledge is good. But it's too dead and so thick that it's inconvenient to carry it on your back.

The Internet is much more convenient, it's always available for us, and it's free.

The Internet connects people all over the world and provides a platform for communication; The Internet can increase the emotional foundation between people.

Of course, the Internet also has shortcomings, such as: **** virus, pornography, unhealthy services, online games will make people fascinated and forget to learn; But it requires restraint to overcome its shortcomings!

In short, the Internet is closely related to our lives, and the Internet allows us to buy what we want without going out; The Internet can be done in the comfort of your own home, and the Internet is an indispensable part of our lives!

1. The Internet is conducive to the formation of new ideas and new consciousness of college students; 2. The network has greatly improved the degree of socialization of ideological education, and the network has enriched the materials of ideological education. 4. The Internet threatens the physical and mental health of college students. 5. Internet communication induces college students' outlook on life.

and a clash of values; 6. The Internet weakens the moral awareness of college students, etc.; All in all, the impact of the Internet on college students is that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. Let me talk about my views on my simple understanding.

1. The positive impact of the Internet on college students and their education.

1) The Internet is conducive to the formation of new ways of thinking for college students.

The traditional way of thinking is a linear way of thinking. The development of the Internet is a transcendence and challenge to traditional thinking. It's a jumping, non-linear way of thinking.

This way of thinking in the Internet era has changed the inherent narrowness and rigidity of traditional thinking, and is conducive to cultivating the divergent thinking of college students.

2) The network is conducive to college students to improve their own quality.

As a means of education, the network has the characteristics of large amount of information, fast transmission speed, and wide range of influence. It not only enriches the educational content, broadens the educational path, helps college students learn and accumulate knowledge in a broad environment, but also helps college students develop and form their personalities. Especially the campus network.

and the establishment and development of the ideological and political work network, which has provided more favorable conditions for college students to receive knowledge.

3) The network has greatly improved the degree of socialization of ideological education work. In the past, traditional university ideological education was often limited to classroom teaching, and the influence of traditional campus culture on students was dominant. The emergence of the Internet has torn down the wall between the school and the society, bringing students into a broader world, through which students can learn about various social phenomena, ideological views, and cultural trends in the world.

4) The network enables us to understand more real students' ideological dynamics, thus improving the pertinence of ideological education. In particular, college students will be willing to express their views and opinions on the Internet, and communicate and discuss some hot issues on campus and society, which are all the expression of students' true thoughts. Teachers can collect, organize, and analyze these online posts to find countermeasures.

During the epidemic, it was precisely because of the Internet that the problem of students attending classes was solved.

We should not blame the quality of students themselves on the Internet.

There are many unfair views on online games in contemporary times, and I myself scoff at them.

With the increasing popularity of computers, online games have also become popular all over the world.

The benefits of online games among teenagers are:

One: Reduce stress. In the 21st century, teenagers live in the era of knowledge economy, learning brings them a lot of pressure, they are still young, and their ability to bear is limited, at this time they need to find their own way to vent - online games, in the fun, to reduce stress.

Two: Increase IQ and increase reaction speed. In online games, they need to use a combination of eyes, hands, and brain reflexes, which can improve reaction speed.

Three: Make friends. In online games, it is usually necessary to fight in teams, which requires teaming up with some strangers, in which they share weal and woe, and will establish deep friendships and become friends in life.

One of the main factors in the state's ban on young people from entering the country is that Internet cafes are mixed and the environment is not good, which requires the state to provide necessary legal and financial support, rather than blindly banning and violating the rights and interests of young people to play.

The top reason why people are so reluctant for teenagers to play online games is that teenagers are addicted to the Internet and can't extricate themselves, and even abandon their studies.

Personally, I believe that there are obvious shortcomings in this area of school education. In most schools, there are no psychological counseling classes, and most of the psychological counseling courses are useless, and in the critical period of rebellion in the hearts of teenagers, there is no guidance, human nature is good, there are no inherently bad students, only irresponsible bad schools.

In addition, there are significant shortcomings in family education, and if parents pay attention to the way their children are educated, this will not happen. In the initial period of children's online games, parents will not be addicted to the Internet if they give a correct understanding and education to their children, most parents will give a criticism in the initial period of children, and the inherent rebellious psychology of children will make them use double the way to resist parents' criticism.

Some people will notice that students are addicted to the Internet and embark on the road of crime in order to raise money.

A: The reason why people are so concerned is because these are just examples, such as eating, everyone eats every day, is there still a need to pay attention? I don't mean to ignore it because there are few people, just to emphasize that this phenomenon is rare, these criminal children, are people who have gone to extremes because of online games, which fully illustrates the necessity of education, we must pay attention to psychological education, only let teenagers realize the benefits and disadvantages of online games, and understand how to do it from the bottom of their hearts, will the phenomenon be prevented, rather than a negative ban.

In conclusion, online games have the power to reduce stress; Increases IQ and increases reaction speed; Pros of making friends. At present, the main reason for the injustice of online games is that there is not enough education in schools and families, and I would like to emphasize that the current situation of online games will not continue, as long as our society and families help and understand. We must face up to this problem and can't blindly avoid it, if we blindly avoid it, the seven gods will not go to heaven, and society will not develop, we must solve the problem, but the advantages of online games outweigh the disadvantages.

Summary. Debate Competition, Debate Title: Should Secondary School Students Go Online? Anyway, the point of view is that middle school students should not go online, and the opponent can ask the positive side what are the sharp questions?

How to ensure that middle school students can use the Internet in moderation?

Is there anything you can ask a square question, preferably sharp, the hard kind.

People are inert, they all like a comfortable environment, and there is no external force in a comfortable environment that is unwilling to come out, so once middle school students are exposed to games on the Internet, this kind of environment, adults can not be controlled, not to mention middle school students who still need to manage, who is responsible for their addiction to the Internet?

What are the arguments that middle school students should not use the Internet.

1. The network information is uneven, middle school students cannot distinguish it, and it is easy to go astray 2. Bad information induces students to form bad habits and styles, thus delaying their studies, and not giving timely guidance will delay their lives.

3. Long-term Internet access and use of electronic products will lead to eye diseases.

This in turn has an impact on overall health.

Middle school students should go online, what sharp questions can they ask the opposing party?

How can I get in and out of the new news and new knowledge without going online?

Others are exposed to these new knowledge and news on the Internet, and if you don't go online, you will fall behind.

What to say about the summary that middle school students should not go online, about 2 and a half minutes.

You can quote the above phrase.

However, after a look at the education department, it was found that in order to show that teachers can make a difference, and students can gain something, only online teaching is the best choice. Therefore, under the call of the Ministry of Education to "postpone learning without suspending classes", "online teaching" has become popular.

This is from the point of view of choice, at least in the education department, online teaching is the best choice.

However, in terms of actual results, the effect of online teaching is polarized.

If the family conditions are good, there are parents who are at home full-time, and they attach great importance to their children's learning, then online teaching is effective. After all, there are knowledge points to read, homework to do, and finally there are teachers to give you correction feedback, and there are parents next to you to supervise the whole process. After the whole set, it's really like taking a class at school.

But for those whose family conditions are not good, and there is not even a computer, the Internet, or even the space for independent learning, and the parents do not care about the children of the family, online teaching will simply become a disaster. Under the requirements of online teaching, mobile phones and pads are equipped for children, but the most important supervision is not, and the final result is that there is not only no efficiency during online teaching, but also the risk of causing these children to become addicted to mobile phones and online games;

So, which of these two poles is the big one?

There is no doubt that families with the above pole are really rare. Because the conditions for online classes are easy to create, but how many parents have the time to accompany them full-time? After the resumption of work, how many parents will be left who could have accompanied their children to class?

If there is no parental supervision, especially for children at a younger age, how many children do you think have so much consciousness that they can hold a mobile phone all day long and just go to class? So, most of it ends up at the lower pole.

Because of this, there are so many voices opposing "online teaching" on the Internet.

Finally, to summarize my opinion:

Online teaching is just a way to teach and is equivalent to a tool. Tools are good tools, but it depends on how they are used and who uses them.

At present, this tool must be used by parents to supervise learning in order to be effective.

If you give this tool to the students and let them learn it on their own, then not only will they not learn something, but they may ruin the students.

I decided to see you sleep in the United States, if you think it is beneficial to sleep, you can say that you can look up information on the Internet, and if there is another one, you can let everyone study online, but for the disadvantages, you can say that everyone will be addicted to playing games, and then abandon their studies.

Many things in the world are pros and cons, and the Internet is no exception. The Internet is like a big river, churning down with pearls and sediment, spreading civilization and dumping garbage, opening up people's wisdom and creating ignorance. In terms of the relationship between it and the development of college students, on the one hand, the Internet, as a new mass communication medium and communication mode, greatly meets people's needs for information resource sharing and communication beyond time and space limitations. On the other hand, the network itself has certain shortcomings, and the network environment is often complex and lacks effective management and protection.

We believe that the impact of the Internet on college students will do more harm than good. Due to the fact that the psychological development of college students is not very mature enough, some college students lack the ability to screen and filter information such as "network culture", network environment and network communication. Therefore, in the current situation where school education focuses on academic performance, and some students cannot keep up with the pressure of academics and employment, the Internet can easily become a "bomb shelter" for some college students to avoid the burden and pressure, so that some people are addicted to it and cannot extricate themselves.

As a result, a small number of students are addicted to online entertainment and have no desire to learn, and some students use the Internet to cause a decline in their moral level, which is shown in the survey results and mentioned in the example above. They all agree with the view that "there are three major harms in the online world: violent games, addictive chatting, and excessive pornography", and the phenomenon of online dating occurs from time to time.

In the survey of college students' views on online dating, only 49% of them are against online dating, and 51% can try online dating. Some students also have online dating experience. College students spend too much time on the Internet, which reduces the time spent on outdoor activities, which is not conducive to the communication between classmates, and also easily leads to the decline of physical fitness.

For example, the unfavorable factors of addiction to the Internet, which not only affects learning, but also increases the financial burden of parents, have affected the learning and physical and mental health of college students. Therefore, we believe that the impact of the Internet on college students will do more harm than good.