Is the turbo a little more fuel efficient, is the turbo fuel efficient

Turbocharging is actually to increase the amount of air intake in the engine, so that the gasoline in the engine is more fully burned...

The operation of the turbocharger is powered by the exhaust of the car, so it must be above 2000 rpm for the engine to work...

Because it works through exhaust gases, it does not bring other consumption to the car, so a car with a turbo is more fuel-efficient than not...

In addition, the turbocharger does not work when the car is just stepping together, so the turbocharged car is not fast at the start, but accelerates quickly after running, and has enough power, which is what we often call high torque. In other words, the top speed of a vehicle with or without a turbo will not change.

The advantage of turbocharging is that when the engine speed exceeds 2000 rpm, it will produce a supercharging effect, which is equivalent to a second rapid speed, if it is most suitable for running high-speed and long-distance runs, if it is running in the city, the turbo will have a certain hindrance to the inhalation.

Exhaust gas turbocharging is definitely more fuel-efficient, and in layman's terms, it is exhaust gas reuse, so the thermal efficiency is higher, and of course it is more fuel-efficient.

There are large and small turbines, the small ones can work at low speeds, but I don't know if there are any turbines that are small enough to be used in the city.

Cars with turbocharged engines are comparatively more fuel-efficient.

A turbocharged engine works on the principle that in the same unit of time, it can force more air and fuel mixture into the cylinder for compression, and at the same speed, it can produce more power, which is also beneficial for improving the fuel economy of the car.

Turbocharging mainly uses the exhaust gas generated by the engine to drive the compressor to work, and at the same time, the intake air can be pressurized. The whole supercharging process does not consume the power of the engine, and the acceleration continuity is good. It should be noted that the turbo does not intervene when the car is driving at low speeds, and the turbine has a certain lag.

Turbocharged engines are more thermally efficient than naturally aspirated engines. If the output power of the naturally aspirated engine and the turbocharged engine is the same, that is, the effective power output of the engine per unit time is the same, under the same work, if the fuel consumption of the engine is less, then the thermal efficiency of the engine is higher.

In the case of the same power, the basic displacement of the turbocharged engine is smaller, and the engine with a small displacement will produce a greater load, and the larger the load, the higher the efficiency of the old engine.

Cars with turbocharged engines are comparatively more fuel-efficient. The working principle of the turbocharged engine is that in the same unit time, more air and fuel mixture Chi Xiang hand gas can be forced into the gas code cylinder for compression, which can produce more power at the same speed, and is also conducive to improving the fuel economy of the car.

Turbocharging is mainly the use of the engine in the work of the exhaust gas to drive the compressor work, at the same time to the banquet to achieve the intake air pressurization, the whole process of supercharging will not consume the power of the engine, with good acceleration continuity, it should be noted that the car in the process of low-speed driving, the turbo is not involved, the turbine with a certain lag.

Compared with the naturally aspirated engine, the thermal efficiency of the turbocharged engine is higher, if the power output of the naturally aspirated engine and the turbocharged engine is the same, that is, the effective work output of the engine per unit time is the same, if the engine produces less fuel consumption under the same work, this means that the thermal efficiency of the engine is higher.

If the power is the same, the base displacement of the turbocharged engine should be smaller, and the load generated by the engine with a smaller displacement will be greater, and the efficiency of the engine will be higher when the load is too large.

Millions of car purchase subsidies.

If the hottest model is an SUV, then the hottest engine must be a turbocharged engine. Especially in China, turbocharged engines have become a must-have when buying a car. After the turbo fire, it also brought a lot of problems to consumers.

For example, whether a turbocharged engine is more fuel-efficient than a naturally aspirated engine has become a difficult problem for car owners and prospective car owners. Next, let's solve this mystery for everyone.

First of all, we can see a lot of advantages from turbocharged engines (the principle of turbocharged engines is itself, so I won't say much about it here). By using waste drives, we can easily generate high horsepower without additional energy loss. In principle, the turbocharged engine achieves direct air intake, reducing the downward process of the cylinders, so in this respect, the turbocharged engine is fuel-efficient.

But on the other hand, turbocharging creates a lot of heat-friendly infiltration. Then heat inevitably leads to consumption, and consuming heat means consuming fuel.

In fact, whether a turbocharged engine is fuel-efficient or not depends on the torque of the engine. It has been actually measured that with the same maximum torque, a small-displacement turbocharged engine is indeed more fuel-efficient than a naturally aspirated engine, while a large-displacement turbocharged engine has no obvious advantage and does not show a fuel-saving advantage. In addition, compared with naturally aspirated engines, turbocharged engines can achieve small displacement and high power, making the vehicle start more powerful, which is also an important reason for being favored by consumers.

In general, turbo destroyers are fuel-efficient. In fact, this is a false proposition! Fuel savings depend not only on turbocharging, but also on factors such as vehicle weight, road conditions, driving habits, and matching with the gearbox.

The responsibility should be shared! Moreover, turbocharging never existed to save fuel!

Yes. The biggest advantage of turbocharging is that it can greatly increase the power and torque of the engine without increasing the engine displacement. Turbocharged engines are not only more fuel-efficient, but also reduce CO (carbon monoxide), CH (hydrocarbon) and PM (particulates) in emissions.

TSI turbocharged direct-injection gasoline engines are designed to produce more torque without increasing engine displacement and achieve and maintain maximum torque output over a wide range of engine speeds.

Many old drivers say that turbocharged engines are fuel-efficient, and many salespeople say that turbocharged engines are more fuel-efficient when introducing them to customers.

However, this is not the case. If you understand how turbocharged engines work, then you can understand why I say that.

Turbocharged engines have turbochargers, and turbochargers consist of two parts, one is a compression turbo and one is an exhaust turbo.

The exhaust turbine is connected to the exhaust manifold. When the engine reaches a small fixed speed, the exhaust has enough energy to drive the exhaust turbine to rotate.

When the exhaust turbine starts rotating, the compression turbine also starts rotating, so that the compression turbine can compress the air body, blowing the air body into the cylinder.

Compared with turbocharged engines and naturally aspirated engines of the same displacement, turbocharged engines have more air in the cylinder, so more oil needs to be injected to mix with the air for combustion, otherwise the engine is also weak.

The turbocharged engine has a large amount of air intake and a large amount of fuel injection, so compared with a naturally aspirated engine, the turbocharged engine with the same displacement actually has higher fuel consumption.

Everyone knows the law of conservation of energy. Assuming that the thermal efficiency of a naturally aspirated engine and a turbocharged engine of the same displacement is the same, the power of a turbocharged engine is higher than that of a naturally aspirated engine, and the fuel consumption of a turbocharged engine is also higher than that of a naturally aspirated engine.

So why do everyone say turbocharged engines are more fuel-efficient? The reason for this is that turbocharged engines can achieve the power of higher displacement and higher fuel consumption engines with lower displacement and fuel consumption, which is understandable.

Generally, the power of the turbocharged engine is higher than that of the naturally aspirated engine, and the fuel consumption of the turbocharged engine is lower, but the power is not worse than that of the naturally aspirated engine, so everyone says that the turbocharged engine is fuel-efficient.

The turbocharged engine can output maximum torque in the low and medium rev range, which is why many consumers prefer this engine.

Millions of car purchase subsidies.