What does appeasement mean Why is the policy of appeasement called appeasement? How did it come abou

To put it simply, it is a policy of appeasement and connivance, and self-preservation is achieved at the expense of the interests of other countries.

Specifically:

The policy of appeasement is also known as appeasement. It is a policy of not resisting aggression, tolerating and conniving, retreating and yielding, and colluding and compromising with the aggressor at the expense of other countries. After the First World War, the rise of the people's revolution and the emergence of the socialist Soviet Union aroused fear and hatred of imperialism.

In the struggle for world hegemony, they not only want to weaken and defeat their rivals, but also oppose socialism and suppress the people's revolution. The policy of appeasement has emerged precisely in response to this need. In different cases, its content, form and approach differ.

But the purpose is to maintain and fight for world hegemony and oppose socialism and the people's revolution. Before World War II, the most active promoters of this policy were Britain, France, and the United States. Before the thirties of the 20 th century, the policy of appeasement was mainly manifested in supporting the defeated Germany, supporting Japan as a shield against the Soviet Union, and suppressing the people's revolution.

This can be glimpsed from the Versailles system and the Washington system. In the Dawes Plan, the Younger Plan, and the Loyingnuo Convention, it is more concrete. In the 30s, especially after the formation of the two warring areas (see Far Eastern War Sources and the Collective Security Policy), in the face of serious challenges from the German, Italian, and Japanese fascist countries, the appeasers in Britain, France, and the United States, represented by British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, did not hesitate to compromise with the aggressors at the expense of the interests of other countries in order to safeguard their vested interests and seek temporary peace, in a vain attempt to divert the troubles to the Soviet Union and reap the benefits.

In 1931, the "918 Incident" tolerated Japan's invasion of Northeast China. March 1935 tolerated aHitler rearmament.

In August 1935, the United States passed the Neutrality Act. In October 1935, he tolerated the Italian invasion of Ethiopia. In March 1936, Hitler was allowed to occupy the Rhine area.

In August 1936, a policy of "non-intervention" was adopted in response to the armed intervention of Germany and Italy in Spain. In July 1937, he connived at Japan to launch a full-scale war of aggression against China, and then planned the Pacific International Conference, plotting to betray China and compromise with Japan. In March 1938, he acquiesced in Hitler's annexation of Austria.

These are all examples of appeasement. The most typical examples of this were the Munich Conference of September 1938 and the Munich Agreement. Britain, France, and the United States, which they supported behind the scenes, tried in vain to achieve "general appeasement" in Europe at the expense of Czechoslovakia and seek "peace for a generation", in essence, pushing Germany to attack the Soviet Union.

History has proven that the policy of appeasement is a policy of conniving, provoking, and expanding war. It could not satisfy the aggressive ambitions of the fascist countries, but it encouraged the aggressors to take risks and hastened the outbreak of World War II.

Appeasement. Suijing Zhengce) refers specifically to the policy of appeasement, connivance, concession and compromise against the aggressor in international relations, and the policy of satisfying the aggressor's desires at the expense of the interests of other countries, seeking its own security, and protecting its own vested interests. In the 30s of the 20th century, in the face of the frenzied aggression and expansion of the German, Italian, and Japanese fascists, Britain, France, and the United States all pursued a policy of appeasement, with British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain as the main representative.

After the First World War, Britain's economy has been in a slump, the British economy has been in extreme financial difficulty, forced to tighten defense spending, the military strength is weakened, and it tries its best to avoid adopting a policy of military confrontation in the international arena. There is a strong trend of pacifism in the country, and the ruling party advocates "peace" in order to win votes. Therefore, when Germany re-embarked on the road of war of aggression, Britain, in order to safeguard its own interests, tried to divert the spearhead of German expansion away from itself by sacrificing the weak and small countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union.

In May 1937, after Chamberlain came to power, he not only inherited the appeasement policy of his predecessor, but also reached its peak. Under the blow of the economic crisis, the French economy has been in a state of depression for a long time and cannot recover, defense spending has decreased, and its military strength lags behind Germany. For the sake of its vested interests, France abandoned its cooperation with the Little Entente and the Soviet Union in the second half of the 30s, and adopted a policy of appeasement towards Germany together with Britain.

Since the beginning of the 30s, the American public has been mainly concerned with domestic economic recovery and employment issues, and has generally not been interested in international affairs, and isolationist forces have re-emerged. In the absence of a direct threat to the United States from fascist aggression, the United States has adopted a policy of neutrality in European political affairs. With the acquiescence and connivance of Britain, France, and the United States, Italy invaded Ethiopia in 1935, Germany marched into the Rhine Demilitarized Zone in 1936, Germany and Italy intervened in Spain from 1936 to 1939, and Germany annexed Austria in March 1938.

In September 1938, the Munich Agreement was signed, and appeasement reached its climax. In September 1939, Germany invaded Poland. Britain and France reaped the consequences of their own efforts and were forced to get involved in the war.

In May 1940, Germany attacked Western Europe, and Chamberlain** marked the complete bankruptcy of the appeasement policy. In the East, after the "18 September Incident," some Western countries also pursued a policy of appeasement toward Japan. After the July 7 Incident, especially after the Japanese occupation of Wuhan and before the outbreak of the Pacific War, Britain, the United States, and Japan had several conspiratorial activities to seek mutual compromise at the expense of China.

Due to the resolute exposure and struggle of the Communist Party of China and the Chinese people, the contradictions between Japan and Britain and the United States could not be reconciled, and the conspiracy to betray China's interests did not succeed.

One of the policies of appeasement is to show that Western countries have adopted the policy of sacrificing the interests of other countries in order to safeguard their own interests. With the connivance of the appeasement policies of Britain, France, and the United States, Germany, Italy, and Japan stepped up their foreign aggression and expansion, and this led to the rapid growth of contradictions among the imperialist countries.

Appeasement is a foreign policy of currying favor with an aggressive rival by making concessions on certain matters that could lead to war. In Chinese, the term is generally used in a derogatory sense, and now it generally refers to the policy of Britain, the United States and France in the 1930s to tolerate and connive at the German, Italian, and Japanese invaders, and did not hesitate to sacrifice the territorial sovereignty of other countries and even their own interests to satisfy the desires of the invaders in order to achieve peace. Generally speaking, it means that others bully the weak, and they maintain the attitude of "turning a blind eye, hearing but not hearing", and "not caring about themselves, and not worrying about themselves".

To put it simply, it is a policy of appeasement and connivance, and self-preservation is achieved at the expense of the interests of other countries. Also in order to cause trouble to flow eastward (to the Soviet Union).

It was the compromise and concession of the Western powers to the German fascists.

The word comes from the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, which means non-resistance to aggression, connivance, sacrificing the interests of other countries, and even colluding with the aggressor, so it is called this way.

Sui means stability, stability. After the First World War, Britain, France, and the United States adopted a policy of appeasement against fascism, that is, to avoid the outbreak of war through tolerance, appeasement and appeasement of fascist aggression and expansion.

The policy of appeasement is a policy of not resisting aggression, tolerating and conniving, retreating and yielding, and colluding and compromising with the aggressor at the expense of other countries.

Before World War II, the most active promoters of this policy were Britain, France, the United States, and other countries. Before the 30s of the 20th century, appeasement was mainly manifested in the support of defeated Germany, support for Japan as a bulwark against the Soviet Union, and a thug to suppress the people's revolution.

This can be glimpsed from the Versailles system and the Washington system. In the Dawes Plan, the Younger Plan, and the Locarno Convention, it is more concrete. The Munich conspiracy pushed the "appeasement" to its peak. "Appeasement" has become a practice of appeasement and cultivation of adultery.

Historical motives for appeasement:

Looking at the international political atmosphere in the twenties and thirties of the twentieth century, especially the British social background, the implementation of the policy of appeasement was not accidental, it was the sum of many factors.

1) Economic decay:

The economy is the life of a country, and the economy determines politics;The declining economy was undoubtedly one of the historical motivations for Britain's appeasement policy.

2) Anti-war ideology:

If the First World War brought the deepest inspiration to mankind, it might as well be said to be the ardent desire for "anti-war and peace". The social trend of "opposing war and seeking peace" is precisely the hotbed for the British ruling class to pursue appeasement, and it is also the pretext for Britain to pursue the policy of appeasement.

3) Specific Politics:

The political arrangements of the British ruling class are an indispensable factor in foreign strategy. In the face of the international community background at that time, the political arrangements of the British authorities also had ulterior motives.

Refer to the above content: Encyclopedia - Appeasement Policy.

Explanation of the policy of appeasement.

It is also known as "the pre-strategy of appeasing the political inspection". A policy of sacrificing the territory, sovereignty, and interests of other countries and their own people, and seeking compromise from the aggressor by means of connivance or concession. For example, on the eve of World War II, Britain, France, the United States, and other countries connived at the aggression and expansion of Germany and Italy in the name of "neutrality."

In 1938, Britain and France signed the Munich Agreement with Germany and Italy, which made Germany and Italy increasingly rampant, thus provoking World War II.

Word breakdown Explanation of appeasement Keep the place calm ;Pacify and calm down;Regardless of the morality and morality, the people were subjugated to the defeat of the Qing Dynasty in order to stabilize the region for eight years, and could not appease the regionJin Shu;Zhang Liangchuan's Detailed Explanation of the Explanation of the Policy of Pacification and Pacification The Code of Action Formulated by the State and Political Parties for the Realization of a Certain Political Line explains in detail the basis and guidelines for the actions formulated by the State or a political party for the realization of the line and tasks of a certain historical period. Lao She "Let's talk about the house":

His 'political life' does not contain any doctrines, ideas, policies, plans, or purposes.