Trump s astonishing rhetoric again! Will the military spending be received next year?

Trump's astonishing rhetoric again! I don't think we will be able to collect military spending next year, after all, it will be a problem if he is not in office tomorrow, let alone military spending.

It is certainly impossible to collect huge military spending, after all, the current military cannot reach such a high value, they cannot create good economic value, they can only bring military strength, and at the same time, Trump's approach is also inhibiting the development of the US military.

No more play. Trump's re-election is basically hopeless, and there will be nothing for him next year.

The United States has a lot of troops stationed overseas, and the military spending is unaffordable for the United States, so Trump used an equal share to solve this problem, but there was no negotiation with Germany, France and other countries, so Teplan was very angry and resentful.

There are more than 370 US military bases abroad, distributed in more than 140 countries and regions, and the number of troops stationed in the United States is as high as 300,000. Such a large garrison requires a huge amount of expenses, and if these costs are paid by the United States out of his own pocket, he cannot afford them. The United States has come up with a method of sharing equally, and the reason is very good, that is, I am responsible for your safety, and you have to take the protection fee, which must be paid as a protection fee

After consultation with the countries stationed there, the United States has cut off the share of the military expenses for the garrison. According to the level of the cost of bearing. This solves one of Trump's major problems, and not everyone will agree.

Germany, France, and others are reluctant to pay for the US military station, because they want to be independent and are ready to build their own defense systems, and they want to be self-sufficient and want to get rid of the control of the United States. Trump jumped to his feet in anger, not only urging for money, but also repeatedly pressuring Germany and other European countries to greatly increase the amount of burden on this military spending. However, people have adopted delaying tactics in response to Trump's request, that is, they do not agree, but they do not refuse.

This annoyed the hot-tempered Trump.

On the issue of stationing troops in the United States, the powerful countries in Europe are unwilling to pay for their military expenses, because they have the ability to protect themselves, and compared with those countries in Eastern Europe, their national strength is weaker.

The original US troops stationed overseas were all paid by the local countries, so Trump thinks that they should pay for it.

The cost of stationing US troops overseas must be paid by his own country, and Trump is so angry because the expenditure is too large.

Any fees charged overseas in the U.S. are fees charged in other ways. The U.S. wants other places to pay for it. But elsewhere, the United States wants to pay for it itself.

The idea of the United States is to let the countries where the troops are stationed pay for themselves, and for some developed countries, they refuse to pay.

Trump wants other countries to pay for it, maybe other countries pay a little more.

I think these should be paid for by the United States itself.

Fees outside the U.S. are all fees charged in other areas.

There should be no one who wants to fight.

In fact, it should be combined with what he said before and after, Trump said before that something similar to strengthening the construction of nuclear weapons must be known that nuclear weapons are deterrence, what is deterrence? That is, in case a certain party launches any attack, it will have to bear a heavy price without any profit, which means that no country can bear dozens or even hundreds of nuclear bombs to attack important cities, and Western military experts believe that in case of attack, they can attack it and the enemy and its allies, after all, the United States has NATO, so that it is not a counterattack against a single country but a retaliation against a bunch of countries, at least a large-scale war will break out, To put it bluntly, it is important to ensure that there are no winners in the end of the war.

And nuclear weapons are not defensive, but offensive, to put it bluntly, it is someone else who attacks, and the United States can only be used after being attacked**, so many people criticize Trump for ignoring US defense and putting the United States in a dangerous position.

However, compared with others, such as the missile defense system (which is not 100% successful in interception and some missiles with nuclear warheads or relatively fast speed may not be able to defend against them), fighter planes, new tanks, etc., not only have high maintenance costs, but also have to constantly invest in costs, as if fighter jets have to burn engine oil, train pilots and maintenance personnel, and have runways to fly, and have airports, and regular training, and fighter life cycles are shorter than nuclear weapons, and they will be eliminated and upgraded in a few years, and their lethality is not as good as nuclear weapons. On the contrary, once the nuclear weapon is built, there is no need to train personnel, and it can be launched directly with one click, the lethality is incomparable, and the cost is far lower than that of an airplane, Trump as a businessman, in fact, this is a typical cost-effective calculation, just like a foreign ATM machine, the businessman has calculated the cost, and he is not afraid that you will move the whole machine, because the ATM has satellite positioning, even if the money is forcibly taken out, there are special devices in the ATM machine, and the money will be sprayed with special chemical ink at the moment when it is taken out. Invalidate the banknotes (generally even if they are fully loaded, it is only hundreds of thousands), so that the bandits have lost their efforts and at the same time there is a danger of being wanted, the cost is too high, it can't be worth it, so now few people in the world will steal ATMs directly...

In fact, the United States has never stopped making moves against its allies, but this time it is more obvious.

The United States did not want the Allies to sit back and enjoy the benefits, so they did so.

It is unlikely that the United States will be able to attack its allies, because it is destroying itself.

The United States does everything, and there is no need to make a fuss.

The United States has never been soft on its allies, and its key allies are willing.

I guess there is such an idea, but it should not be too forced.

I really don't know this, whether it will depend on his own.

Trump urged allies to pay military spending, probably to get a fortune on the side of the allies.

In fact, there is still some significance.

The United States has finally become the world's sole superpower, forming a situation in which one superpower and many powers have formed, and it has to be said that the proportion of military superiority is very large, so it is impossible to give up this superiority.

And Trump is a businessman, he goes out to talk about business, sign agreements with other countries that are more beneficial to him, and to ensure that he is beneficial to himself, first of all, you have to have military strength, for example, Japan and South Korea still have US military bases that are protected by the United States, if Japan, South Korea, etc. have differences with the United States in terms of economy and trade, the United States can come to the bottom of the kettle at any time and say that they will withdraw their troops, so who can they find to protect?

Also, the army can actually alleviate some of the employment pressure, the current unemployment rate in the United States is quite high, and there are even reports that white people are sleeping on the street, and now the world is generally peaceful, in fact, many people in the United States are making money and even improving welfare benefits by joining the army, just like the news says that many aborigines have joined the army, they have earned a lot of money and benefits, and there are other people's respect for aborigines, as if the salary of serving in the U.S. military is still considerable.

In fact, Germany also used the same trick in World War II, due to the Great Depression, there were a lot of unemployed people, and Hitler saw this, and large-scale expansion of the army, from the 100,000 German army stipulated in the Versailles Treaty (in fact, many of these 100,000 are veterans, elite), and then expanded to 500,000 to 1 million in the future, the reason why it was able to expand so easily was because the unemployment rate was too high at that time...

The reason why Trump asked NATO to increase military spending is because the United States needs the money paid by other NATO members to fight its own wars with other countries. Once the United States goes to war, it will need a large amount of funds, but it is unwilling to spend its own country's money, so it strongly demands that NATO increase military spending so as to ensure its own expenditure when it fights a war.

At the previous NATO summit, Trump has been pointing the finger at Germany, and Trump believes that Germany, as a leading country in economic development, has not paid up to the standard of military spending, and Trump is very dissatisfied with this. According to the requirements, the military spending of each NATO member state should be 2% of the GDP of each countryAccording to relevant statistics, excluding other members of NATO, according to the current standards, the investment is close to four times that of Russia, which is a very huge amount.

But Trump has again demanded that NATO members double their military spending from 2 percent to 4 percent. The rest of NATO is very controversial about Trump's request, believing that it will not be able to accomplish the task at all.

Trump's purpose in proposing this reason is to fight America's own war with the money of other NATO members. Although on the face of it, the United States spends more on military spending than all other NATO members combined, the United States basically spends this money on the construction of its own country. Therefore, whether it is war or the development of the country, it is the United States that benefits.

Although other countries in NATO have great opinions about the United States, because the European countries are weaker than the United States, their position in NATO is not as good as that of the United States. Even though they have big opinions about the United States, they have to listen to Trump's demands.

Trump is a warmonger, and using this means to cheer himself up and show his power is to lift a stone to hit himself in the foot, stir up the peace of the world, and provoke the people of the world to resent him.

This is naturally for the sake of the Americans, who want the United States to pay less for itself.

Trump's demand for NATO to increase military spending is to make Americans pay less for military spending, but they still have to live in NATO.

Trump wants to expand U.S. control in NATO, which would increase America's position in the international arena

To put it bluntly, I want the horse to run and I want the horse not to eat grass, anyway, I can do anything for the benefit of the country.

I think he must have had his own ideas in mind for such a strong request, and he must have done it for his own benefit. The above is one of my own personal thoughts.

On the one hand, they want to have a certain obstacle to NATO, and on the other hand, they want to benefit themselves.

That's what happens when you become attached to someone else. Whatever people say, it's what it is. People say one, but you don't dare to say two.

People tell you to face east, but you never dare to face west. Let it increase its military spending, although they are 10,000 unwilling, in the end, it still has to give, where it has to give. The United States must control the development of the European Union!

In fact, such a strong demand must have its own ideas, and it must be done for its own interests.

I wonder if the increase in military spending is aimed at creating contradictions with the deployment of THAAD, unifying the Korean Peninsula, or suppressing China's development.

The imperialists are always wolves, and we can only survive better if we are strong ourselves.