Did the chicken come first, the egg came first, did the chicken come first, or did the egg come firs

From a scientific point of view, after careful research by scientists from all over the world, the conclusion is that there are eggs!

Why? It starts from ancient times, because eggs were in ancient times, when there were no living things on earth! Later, after various reasons, bacteria were produced, many of these bacteria are some irregular shapes, but most of them are close to the circle, so they are variable under various factors in the future, so as to evolve some plants, and then animals appeared, in the earliest times all animals were dependent on laying eggs to continue the next generation, it is in this way that there were no chickens at that time, only eggs, from the time of dinosaurs to the present, chickens are transformed by birds, so it is said that there are eggs first! ～！

There are chickens first, eggs are born by chickens, but if you want to ask the chickens are heavy where, then you can explain it to you in this way, with the biological explanation is that the microorganisms in nature, after a long period of evolution and climate changes, make it a kind of animal by the door, the beginning is not called the chicken is later changed to the habit of the door.

That's it, and then with the eggs recycle OK

Of course, there are eggs first, let's have more knowledge, how eggs are formed, there are some substances that have been formed by chemical and physical action, in fact, it is egg pulling, and the first chicken is born after dyeing.

It is said that there was an egg first, and according to the latest scientific research, the mutation was produced in the egg, that is, one other egg suddenly became an egg, and the first chicken hatched.

Chicken or egg? Aristotle, a scholarly authority active in 3000 B.C., said: "There is an egg without a father and a mother, and the first chicken pops out of the egg".

The chicken says there is a chicken, the egg says there is an egg first, and so on.

There must have been chickens first, or how to call them eggs.

Chicken or egg?

There is no answer to this kind of question.

It seems that most people don't know the answer to this question! Maybe it doesn't have an answer!

You can ask the chickens, or maybe the eggs.

Do you think it came first, the chicken or the egg?

Boring loop-and-loop problem.

Commonly used in debates.

First the child, or first the mother?

The egg or the chicken came first in the world? In order to find the truth, the chicken clan actually traveled to 100 worlds, where there were eggs or chickens first? In order to find the truth, the chicken clan actually crossed over to 100

From a scientific point of view, we start with the first life on Earth, and the first life on Earth should be infinitely close to the way bacteria or viruses reproduce.

The key to solving the problem is how we define the "egg" -- if we think that the "egg" must be the egg laid by the chicken, then it must be the chicken that came first.

There are chickens and then eggs, eggs are a cell of chickens, there are many chickens that do not lay eggs in this world, and there are countless eggs that have not become chickens, which shows that eggs are just a part of the chicken, and this part must be mated This physical and chemical reaction can be produced, just like there is no aluminum alloy in the world, eggs are also synthetic, so there are chickens and then eggs.

First there are chickens and then there are eggs, because they are eggs.

There are eggs first, then chickens, because there are eggs to hatch chickens.

Do you think it came first, the chicken or the egg?

The key to solving the problem is how we define the "egg" -- if we think that the "egg" must be the egg laid by the chicken, then it must be the chicken that came first.

Chicken or egg? Aristotle, a scholarly authority active in 3000 B.C., said: "There is an egg without a father and a mother, and the first chicken pops out of the egg".

It's not the chicken that came first, it's not the egg that came first. The question is pointless.

Eggs: Eggs come first, chickens come later.

The egg or the chicken came first in the world? In order to find the truth, the chicken people actually traveled to 10 billion years ago!

Did the chicken come first or the egg came first? It's a difficult question for us. But on the issue of first-come-first-served or first-served, we can make a decision.

Whichever you want to believe is which, and people must have a faith. Whether it's right or wrong.

The debate over the chicken-and-egg has been going on for thousands of years in many fields, including philosophy and science. A few days ago, British scientists claimed to have solved this puzzle that has been bothering mankind.

Only with this protein can there be eggshells.

According to reports, scientists from the University of Sheffield and the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom recently gave the exact answer to this question: "There are chickens first." A team of researchers found that eggshell formation relies on a protein called OC-17, which can only be produced in the ovaries of hens.

The researchers concluded that the first egg could only be produced if there were chickens first.

Dr Freeman, from the Department of Engineering Materials at the University of Sheffield, said: "It was previously suspected that it was an egg that came first, but now based on scientific evidence, it is actually a chicken that came first. This protein has been identified as inextricably linked to the formation of eggs, and we have learned how it controls this process.

It's quite interesting, and different types of birds seem to be doing the same job with this protein. ”

Scholars mostly believe that there came first.

In past debates about the chicken-and-egg issue, scientists have generally tended to favor the egg-first. In 2008, Canadian paleontologist Zelenitsky said that through the study of 77 million-year-old dinosaur egg fossils, a clear answer to the puzzle emerged: dinosaurs first built nests-like nests, laid eggs that resembled bird eggs, and then dinosaurs evolved into birds.

So it is clear that the egg existed before the chicken. Chickens evolved from these carnivorous dinosaurs that laid egg-like shapes.

Philosophers also believe that there came first.

The philosopher Papino, a philosopher at King's College London in England, even proved from a philosophical point of view that there was an egg first. He said, "Plant melons and get melons, and sow beans and get beans."

If it is said that the egg laid by the kangaroo and the result is an ostrich, then the egg must have been laid by an ostrich, not a kangaroo. In the same way, the first chicken could not have hatched from the eggs laid by other animals, only the eggs that had before the chickens.

The Bible Genesis 1:20-22 records that ——— came chickens.

I watched Liaoning Satellite TV's program "Talking about the World" that day, and the host said that British scientists had recently discovered that chickens contained a chemical in their bodies, so the initial inference was that chickens were first, but in the end, it was not determined.

According to expert research, there are both chickens and egg drops at the same time, and you can find out why if you go to soso and look it up.

Chicken or egg? Aristotle, a scholarly authority active in 3000 B.C., recognized Hu Xiao as "there is an egg without a father and a mother, and the first chicken pops out of the egg."

Is it the chicken that comes first or the eggs that come first? This is a difficult problem for us to observe. But on the issue of first-come-first-served or first-served, we can make a decision. Farewell.

Do you think there was a chicken or an egg first?

The key to solving the problem lies in how we define "eggs" If we think that "eggs" must be eggs laid by chickens, then it must be the first chicken.

First, there is a chicken bright silver and a finch feast, is there an egg year teaser first?

Do you think it came first, the chicken or the egg?

The key to solving the problem is how we define the "egg" -- if we think that the "egg" must be the egg laid by the chicken, then it must be the chicken that came first.

From a scientific point of view, we start with the first life on Earth, and the first life on Earth should be infinitely close to the way bacteria or viruses reproduce.

Is it the chicken that came first or the egg that came first. This is how the question should be understood. For chickens