The minister fought for selflessness without regard for his name Gu explained

Gu "Movement" shape sound. From the page, header. Indicates that it is related to the head. Hire voice. Original meaning: look back) Same as original meaning [turn round and look at; look back]

Gu, look around also. Sayings

Gu saw Han riding Sima Lu Ma Tong. Historical Records: Xiang Yu Benji".

Be thoughtful. Poetry, Hinoki Wind, Bandit Wind".

The words are careless, and the tears are out. Poetry, Xiaoya, Dadong".

In the car, don't look inside, don't talk quickly, don't point to yourself. The Analects of the Township Party

Zhuangzi held on to his guns. Zhuangzi Qiushui

Friends are ashamed, and they don't quote them. Yuan Fang entered, regardless of it. The World Speaks New Language: Founder

Jing Ke Gu smiled at Wuyang, and Xie said: "The contemptible people of the Northern Barbarians have not tasted the Son of Heaven, so they are intimidated." Warring States Policy: Yan Ce".

Another example: Gu Zhan (looking back and looking around; Favor; care); Gu Pan Shenghui (a.

Gu gù (Gu).

Looking back: looking ahead. Introduction: Left and right. Ring all around.

Attention, care, care: the big picture. Shine. Close. Fight hard.

Visiting, visiting: three thatched houses.

The store said that the one who came to buy the goods: be kind to the customer. Preferential veteran.

Literary adverbs. But, on the contrary, it is not enough to hear. The foot is reversed to the top, and the first is lower (head: head).

Consultant] is a person who has the expertise to consult and advise.

scruples] not bold, fearful.

Concerns] worried. After thinking about it, he refused or dared not act.

It should belong to the second interpretation, the meaning of caring and caring.

In addition to ** Dao Gan lonely, who wants to take care of me and stay with each other.

"Selfishness" is not considering the interests of others, including spiritual and material interests, and selfish people must satisfy themselves even if they harm others.

"Selfless" literally means not for oneself, but the essence of human beings is to satisfy themselves, and a good person wholeheartedly helps others in order to implement his own principles and beliefs, so "selfless" is interpreted as not only taking care of one's own interests, but also selfless people will sacrifice their own interests for others, realize their own ideas, and obtain spiritual satisfaction.

The common denominator between the two is to satisfy oneself, selfishness only needs to ignore others to satisfy oneself, selflessness must involve others to satisfy oneself, so that more selflessness is the greatest selfishness, and the sentence you asked is the conclusion of this thinking.

I don't agree with this sentence, it is mostly used to ridicule selfless people, selfish people will only look at the world from their own point of view, and the real selfless people have always stood in everyone's point of view, this is their difference, such a life is indeed against human nature, many people will not want to do this, but if there is no selflessness and people who pursue selflessness, how difficult world do people have to live in, how much pain do they have to go through to achieve happiness?

I thank all those who have given selflessly for the sake of others!

I marvel at your beauty!

Just say a little bit about your own superficial understanding of this sentence, selfishness is the basic human nature, saints are difficult to achieve in the vast majority of ordinary terms, "selfishness" is human nature, but I think "selfishness" in a broader sense does not mean praise and disparagement with moral overtones, that is, to meet one's own needs. It is not to advocate only considering one's own interests, or to borrow from "Mencius, Liang Hui Wang" in "the old and the old, the young and the young" to see that it is more able to express my meaning, people must first be "selfish" and then "selfless", because I have the old and the young, and pity the old and the young of others, this is logical, and it can be more profound and heartfelt. Most of people's attitudes towards external people and things should be a re-projection of internal values, experiences, and emotions, and it is difficult to get a natural sense in the heart without internal identity, or to be "selfless" unconsciously.

Of course, if we push ourselves and others to "selflessness" because of "selfishness", then this "selflessness" will not or should not be noble as morality, because it is also the "greatest selfishness". If one day this kind of selfishness and selflessness become a matter of course, then I think there should be the prototype of a harmonious society.

This is not true. The purpose of this sentence is to say that the selfless person essentially seeks to satisfy his own spirit, but the selfish person also seeks to satisfy his own material needs, but also to satisfy his spiritual needs. All people are "selfish" at this point, but the "altruistic" looks much greater.

I'd love to know who said that? Is he making excuses for his own selfishness? Or when others are fools, selfishness and selflessness are the two extremes. He thought that "happiness gives birth to sorrow, and love gives birth to hatred" is so simple?

Lao Tzu said that because it is not private, it can become its own selfishness. The ultimate beneficiary of selflessness is actually oneself. Material devotion is spiritually rewarded. Selfless people are the happiest.

Because in traditional Chinese culture, cause and effect have always been used to it. When you are selfless, you are the cause and you will surely bear good fruits. Benefit from yourself. Therefore, the greatest selfishness is selflessness.

This statement has not been seen in any professional thinker ... Personally, I think it's a justification for my selfishness ... In fact, such a statement is seriously wrong.

Do you know what selfishness is, that is, everything is your own, and the existence of others is your own, which is called selfishness. But do you know that the world considers, one day you become a god, you have to be your own everything, you don't like others, there are no other people, how selfish, but for example, the person you hate has to go through his life, do you say that such selfishness is selfish, count, but it is meaningless, this is called selflessness. And then it was logical that he was afraid that he would experience misfortune, so he thought that nothing would happen, so that there would be no serious suffering in the world, which was still selfish, but it didn't make sense.

The truly great men are selfish for their own noble purposes, but their selfishness is noble and selfless.

This sentence has no source at all, I don't know which marketing account made it up, and how to explain it.

The greatest manifestation of selflessness Machiavellianism bears any resemblance to selflessness.

Selfishness in a broad sense: Actions and reactions based on the need for personal gain.

Selfishness in the narrow sense: The concept of "selfishness" is often included in the concept of "self-centeredness".

Selflessness refers to only looking out for the good of the collective. There is no selfishness.

Then, we can find that the difference between selfishness and ignorance is actually on a scale, selfishness is only self-concerning, and selflessness does not include the self.

If we extend the scope of this self in selfishness to match the scope of selflessness, we can understand this sentence in the question. Because in the eyes of the speaker, everything in the world is his own, so he can reach the so-called level of selflessness.

Explanation: The law of nature is to benefit things and not to harm things: the law of the saints is to give alms, not to compete for the way of loss, and not to harm them.

Source: Spring and Autumn Lao Tzu "Tao Te Ching. Chapter 81

Original text: Faith is not beautiful, beautiful words are not believed. The good do not argue, and the debater is not good. Those who know are not knowledgeable, and those who are knowledgeable do not know. The saint does not accumulate, because he thinks that he has more and more with himself. The way of heaven is beneficial but not harmful; The way of the saint is indisputable.

Translation: True and credible words are not pretty, and beautiful words are not true. Kind people don't say it by chance, and people who say it by heart are not kind. Those who are truly knowledgeable do not pretend, and those who pretend that they know more are not really knowledgeable.

The saint is not possessive, but tries his best to take care of others, and he himself is more sufficient; He tries his best to give to others, and he is richer. The law of nature is to benefit all things without harming them. The code of conduct of the saints is not to fight with others in anything.

For: as, here refers to doing things.

It means that you should not fight with others when doing things, and do not harm others while seeking benefits.

This fully embodies the Taoist idea of tranquility.

It's not good to do things and fight with each other, it's good for yourself, but it's not good if you hurt others. This can guide us in our daily life.

Basic literal meaning.

1.Looking back, it generally refers to seeing: 眄.

As the name suggests. Return. 2.

Care, Attention: and. Fear.

Consider. Read. Relieve.

Whole. Ask. Pity.

And. 3.A store or service is called to buy goods or request services

Guest. Benefit. Host.

4.Visit: Three thatched houses.

5.Literary conjunctions, but, but look: "There are not many soldiers, how to use them like ears".

6.Literary conjunctions, on the contrary, but: "The foot is on top, and the first is on the bottom."

7.Gu Tong "hire", pay. 8.Surname.

It has the meaning of "to see", such as "looking ahead and looking backwards", ......

Visits, such as "three visits to the thatched house".

Literary conjunctions, but, but look at "there are not many soldiers, how to use them like ears".

Literary conjunctions, on the contrary, are like "the foot is reversed, and the first is the first." ”

**, look at "Gu I will laugh." ”

Take care of, care such as "three-year-old through you, don't I care." ”

Meaning: A rabbit in the wild, from the crowd running through many people will chase after it, will want to take it for themselves. But if a rabbit is put on the market**, people pass by, but they don't want to take the rabbit as they already have, it's not that they don't want to get the rabbit, but the ownership of the rabbit already belongs.

Source: "Lü's Spring and Autumn Period: Prudence".

Original text: Today, a rabbit goes, a hundred people chase it, and a rabbit foot is divided into 100 people, and the score is undecided. The points are undecided, Yao and bend, and everyone cares!

The rabbit is in the city, and the walkers ignore it. If you don't want a rabbit, the points have been decided. The division has been decided, although people are despised.

Therefore, governing the world and the country depends on the division.

Translation: There is a rabbit running in the field, and there are hundreds of people chasing it, not because one rabbit can be divided among a hundred people, but because the ownership is not settled. The ownership has not been decided, and even a saint like King Yao has no way to solve it, let alone the general public!

Flocks of rabbits are piled up in the market, and no one who walks by them looks at them. It's not that people don't want to get rabbits, it's because those rabbits already have owners. Ownership has been determined, and some people, even though they are rude, do not fight for it.

Therefore, to govern the world and the country, it is only about determining the ownership of ownership.

Meaning: When a rabbit runs, many people chase it, but they don't look at so many rabbits in the market. It's not that you don't want rabbits, it's that ownership has been determined and can no longer be fought for.

From: "Lü's Spring and Autumn Period: Prudence".

Original text: "Today, a rabbit goes, a hundred people chase it, and a rabbit foot is divided into 100 people, which is undecided." By undecided, Yao and bent force, and the situation is everyone?

The rabbit is full of the city, and the walkers don't care, but they don't want the rabbit, and the points have been decided. The division has been decided, although people are despised. Therefore, governing the world and the country depends on the division.

Interpretation: When a rabbit runs away, a hundred people rush up to catch him, not because everyone can get one percent of the rabbit after catching the rabbit, but because the ownership of the rabbit is not determined. There are so many rabbits for sale in the market that thieves don't dare to steal because the ownership of the rabbits in the market is clear.

Therefore, before the name of the thing is determined, Yao, Shun, Yu, and Tang also chase after it like a galloping horse, and after the name is determined, the greedy thieves do not dare to seize it. If the decree is not clear and its items are uncertain, the people of the world will comment on it, and there is no definite explanation for its deliberations, which vary from person to person. The people make decrees at the top, and the people are discussing them at the bottom, which is the law is uncertain, and the next generation is the name.

The name is uncertain, Yao and Shun are still illegal, not to mention ordinary people. In this way, the evil will flourish, and the ruler will lose his authority, which is the foundation of the country's demise. For example, when a saint writes a book and circulates it to future generations, it must be taught by a teacher in order to know its specific contents.

Therefore, the saint must have appointed judges for the decree. Setting up judges to be teachers of the world and people is to determine the name. The name is determined, the treacherous can be made upright and honest, the people are discreet and loyal, and they are self-governing.

Therefore, determining the name is the inevitable solution, and uncertain the name is the inevitable method.

Translated, it means -

If a rabbit runs in the wild, hundreds of people chase after it to get it. But the rabbits sold in the market are rarely contested. It's not because people don't want to get rabbits, it's that rabbits in the market have long had owners and can't compete anymore.

This is a well-known allusion in jurisprudence, which talks about the ownership of property - once the ownership is determined, it can no longer be moved casually, and if the ownership is uncertain, everyone can take possession of it.

That is to say, the more you rob with people, the less things you have, the more rare they are by people, and the more piles you have, the more people can share one, the more people care.

Righteous annihilation.

Introduction [pinyin] dà yì miè qīn

Righteous annihilation. Interpretation]: Righteousness: righteousness, righteousness; Pro: Relatives. In order to uphold justice, there is no favoritism towards the relatives who commit crimes, so that they can receive the punishment they deserve.

synonyms]: selfless, unfavoritism, iron-faced selflessness.

Antonyms]: bending the law for favoritism, favoritism, and admitting thieves as fathers.

Syntax]: associative; as a predicate, object, and definite; It has a positive meaning and refers to upholding justice.

Example]: This is a man, there is only one party in life and death. Ding Ling, "The Sun Shines on the Sanggan River", 24.

Yao Xueyin's "Li Zicheng": "Governing the army is like governing the country, and it is better to abolish the law for personal reasons." ”