Urgent 30 questions with higher parts of speech clauses must have answers and answer explanations 15

1.The original sentence should be ......offer me what advice she can offer It's going to be very verbose, so I don't have to do it, and you should be able to learn it when you learn to omit sentences.

2.The whole sentence "he said at the meeting was really true" is used as a definite sentence for the first that, and you replace the second that with which to feel it.

It is better to use whether instead of if, see the difference between whether and if.

It can lead the predicative clause, but australia here is to express a country and a thing rather than a place, so it can be said.

australia was a country which used to be a nation of prisoners

1.Offer me what advice she can omitted after offer me, which means: she gave me the advice she could.

2.After all, that is the leading word of the same clause, guide: what he said at the meeting was really true

3.If cannot be used here, because why here leads to the predicative clause, and the introductory word in the predicative clause can use whether to indicate "whether", but not if (if in the noun clause can only lead the object clause).

4。where can lead to a predicative clause, e.g. this is where she was born

What is missing here is the subject (with what) in the predicative clause

In the first sentence, what advice she can do is the direct object of the offer, not the object complement;

In this sentence, jim told us all that he said at the meeting was really the same clause clause that does all, all that equals what

In the third sentence, the name of the if-guided clause is generally not used as a predicative clause;

First of all, where can lead the predicative clause; (what) used to be a nation of prisoners: Obviously, this sentence is a predicative clause; And in the predicative clause, what is missing in the parenthetical part is the subject, obviously what as a pronoun can act as this component, and where is an adverb, no;

1. c.what is correct.

What seemed to be a piece of stone is a noun clause that serves as the object of the preposition on, and in the clause what is the subject. Original sentence meaning in Chinese: When she woke up, she found herself standing on what appeared to be a rock.

2. d.what is correct.

Here what appears to be a nose is an object clause that is juxtaposed with the preceding eyes. and the can hear This place should be and they can hear. Original sentence meaning in Chinese:

Fish have eyes and what appears to be a nose, and they can also hear sounds.

3. b.what is correct.

There are three common sentence patterns in English that mean multiples, and if you want to say that object A is three times the size of B., you can say: A is three times the size of b / a is three times as big as b.

a is twice bigger than b.This question fits a is three times the size of bThis structure, except that the size of b uses a noun clause here what it was before 1990.

Original sentence meaning: The current production is six times that of the pre-1990 level.

4. d.whatever "whatever it is".

whatever the price "no matter what**, no matter what**". Original sentence meaning: When environmentally friendly cars appear in the market, many people are in a hurry to buy them without asking how to do it.

I hope my explanation will be helpful to you.

First of all, no matter what the clause is, the sentence is required to be written using declarative word order; In addition, all clauses can have a conjunction.

1. Select C subject clause - the judgment is based on word order.

Option a and b should be changed to -where why the fighting is correct.

2. Select C object clause - judge based on conjunctions.

as if---even; because--- because; however – however, generally adverbs.

except that concatenate a preposition-led object clause.

3. Select C predicative clause - judging based on conjunctions.

4. Choose c copositional clause - judgment based on 1) because of need to be matched with a noun; 2) The copositional clause uses the conjunction that

5. Select a subject clause - the judgment is based on 1) the formal subject usage in the IT sentence pattern 2) the idiomatic expression.

In My Opinion and I Believe Semantic Duplication Think and In My Mind Semantic Duplication Generally don't say so.

The noun clause should be the subject, and the clause should be in normal word order.

The two sentences before and after are the turning point.

Grammatically, first of all, a d, b is excluded from the topic.

Homonymous clause.

b should be not in advance, d repeated, c plausible, believing is the ing form of the verb, not the gerund, there is no such usage. It is possible to use the noun form belief

c Subject Clause A sentence acts as a subject, using a special question word + declarative sentence order (don't you add the definite article the?? ）

c is followed by a clause that means "except."

cwhy leads to the predicative clause, ". .reasons".

After cof, add the object, that leads the copositional clause.

ait seems seemed to + clause.

1 The options are a bit messed up and there are no printing errors?

2c3c4c5a

1 where 2 that 3 when 4 that 5 which (non-restrictive definite clause, and in the clause as the subject component, so not use whom, use which) 6 that 7 that 8 that 9 as 10 as

1 stayed is changed to spend, the clause part is i spend with them, holiday is the object in the clause, stay does not match holiday.

2 where is changed to that, hospital is the subject in the clause is not an adverbial, so it cannot be used where, it is a definite clause.

3 that is changed to who, those is the subject in the clause, indicating those people, so you can't use that, it's an identical clause, 4 which is preceded by in, way is the adverbial part in the clause, so you can't add which directly, and you also need a preposition.

The related words of the guiding clause are not very responsible, mainly depending on the type of the clause and what components the related words play in the clause, and it should be easier to grasp the related words from these two points.