Yongzheng is enthroned or usurped, Yongzheng succeeds to the throne, is it really a usurpation?

Of course, it's on the throne, it is written in "The Prosperous Age of Kangqian", 14 It seems unlikely that the elder brother will be the emperor, he is a general king!

Wild history needs to have some selling points, so the more bizarre the better, so that history is also confused. TV series, the more, the better, so we're getting more and more confused now. But to tell the truth, judging from the results, Yongzheng is indeed the best among the sons of Kangxi, and if other princes succeed him, no one can suppress him.

Kangxi is the first emperor of the ages, and his wisdom and martial arts are famous, even in his later years, he has not become mediocre, so it is not strange that he chose Yongzheng. The reason why Yongzheng is criticized in history is because Kangxi was in charge of the military with the fourteenth prince in the later period, so it is natural to think that he wants to pass on the throne to him, but in fact, a large part of the achievements of the fourteenth elder brother was given to him by Kangxi, and in terms of means, it is far worse than Yongzheng, so I believe that this is Kangxi's own choice.

Historians are fighting over this issue! If he still has some political achievements, the state can be managed, regardless of whether he is a usurper or a usurper! They all fooled the emperor!

He also served for 13 years, and played a role in the prosperity of Kangqian! A very good emperor!

The history of the wild digging and withering is not a succession, but a seizure of the throne.

What the official history said was mainly due to the role of family affection: the struggle between the princes in Kangxi's later years was very serious, and there were even signs of cannibalism. But Yinzhen has always been very friendly and filial; Other princes always intercede for him when they make mistakes, and Kangxi is also very concerned when he is sick (maybe not sincerely, but his performance is indeed like this), which has a great impact on Kangxi, who is old and sick, and does not feel family affection in other princes.

Someone said that the usurpation of the throne of the fourteenth son of the emperor, Kangxi's edict in his later years was to pass on the throne of the fourteenth son, and Yongzheng changed the word "ten" to the word "Yu", which is equivalent to usurping the position of his younger brother. Everyone looks like this, pass the fourteenth, then change it, add a horizontal on the top of the cross, and add a hook at the bottom, and it will be "passed on to the four sons", and the position will be passed on to Yongzheng. There are so many books, so many stories, and wild histories all say so.

This matter can't stand scrutiny, why can't it stand scrutiny?

The first point is that at that time, the word "Yu" was written in traditional Chinese, and we write simplified characters today, and the previous ones were in traditional Chinese, and the traditional characters should be Yu"on", then it is not easy to change the word "ten" to the word "Yu", this is one. Second, the Qing Dynasty's writing habits at that time, it was called the fourteenth son of the emperor, the fourth son of the emperor, there was an emperor in front of it, if it was changed, it would become "passed on to the fourth son of the emperor", it would not work, and third, the edict of the throne at that time was Manchu and Han, Manchu and Han were defeated, and the Chinese you said that the word "ten" was changed to the word "Yu" also has a little meaning, then you can not change the Manchu text.

According to these three reasons, it is said that Kangxi passed on the throne to the fourteenth son, and the decision to pass on the throne to the fourth son is not established.