Which is better, D700 or Invincible Rabbit why is the pixel difference so much? Don t fool me .

The Invincible Rabbit and D700 themselves do not belong in the same class.

Strictly divided, D700 and 5D belong to the same grade!

It's like if you compare D3 with D3, Malaysia 3 should be compared with D3X, right? You said no?

If you have to choose between these two machines, the invincible rabbit must have an advantage over D700, and the pixels and functions are a lot ahead.

However, the mechanical properties of the invincible rabbit do not seem to be very stable, and there are many problems reflected on the Internet, such as what reflectors fall off and so on.

It is recommended that you wait for the upgraded version of the D700 to come out before making a comparison--- it may be called the D800 at that timeThe pixels must be more than 20 million, and the function must not be worse than that of the invincible rabbit.

What's more, Nikon's machine workmanship and performance should always be better than Canon's, but Canon seems to be richer and more creative than Nikon when it comes to lenses. This is where the most tangled part is.

It's a bit off-topic, which machine to buy depends on personal preference, there is no absolute good and absolutely bad, because as an ordinary photography enthusiast, it is impossible to give full play to all the advantages and all the potential of the camera, not to mention this full-frame top camera!

Therefore, no matter which one you choose, it will definitely be enough for you to ponder for three or five years.

There's not much to say.

Invincible rabbit is certainly good.

I can't say enough about this in detail, you can just go to Mowgli or Hummingbird to see the parameter comparison.

It can only be parameterized.

If you talk about color restoration, there is no way to compare what messy things are.

The D700 also has his strengths.

If you want to elaborate, you can really write**.

The reason for this is the plot, and many people like Nikon's brisk shutter sound, high ISO control expressiveness, and continuous shooting speed of 8 frames per second. I like Canon because Canon has high pixels and good saturation, depending on your choice.

If the technology is excellent, both cameras are good, pick any one.

The D700 1200W pixel is highly forgiving.

5dii 2400w pixel video.

Brother, I was hesitant to settle for these three cameras. I originally took the money to buy the D90, but I fell in love with the D700, but fortunately I calmed down, and the mental journey at that time was:

1.Photography enthusiasts, the requirements for full-frame and non-full-frame are not very high, and I am afraid that the full set of cameras will be wasted in my hands, so I am positioned in non-full-frame.

2.I'd rather have a chicken head than a phoenix tail. The D300S is not the king of the full-frame system, if you can use this machine well, you can afford to buy the full-frame king D3X or the C's Malaysia 3 in the future, so why rush to buy the D700 now?

To be honest, I'm running the D300S right now! I don't envy the people around me who take the invincible rabbit or D700.

3.But I have to talk about the problem with the lens, non-full-frame lenses can't be used on full-frame cameras because of vignetting. Unless the time comes, but how can we always intercept **?

So, although the non-full-frame camera lens group is relatively cheaper, if you buy a camera such as the D3X in the future, you can sell these lenses in the second-hand market.

You don't have to think about it, no matter how cost-effective it is, it also costs money, why buy a eliminated model?

Conclusion, buy D300s.

D300S experience:

1. Humanization. Don't underestimate the details of improvement, details determine success or failure.

2. Fuselage***. Although I also have a Canon machine, I still have to quat the Nikon ***.

3. Although the image quality is largely determined by the lens, the function of this camera is impeccable.

4. Don't think that its video function is a chicken rib, although I almost gave up D300S because it has a video recording function, but later I learned that its video function is played well, especially feeling, because it supports manual focus in video. In short, you can take a picture of the feeling of tears in your eyes.

5. Now the price of this machine has been reduced again, and the cost performance is higher! Non-full-frame machine!

1.There is also a difference between the two lenses on the high-end 2470, but it is only a matter of style, and the aperture is only a ratio, not a specific size.

2.Nikon's low-end machines are much better at workmanship than Canon's low-end machines, and there is not much difference when it comes to the top end, with the D700 slightly better than the Invincible Rabbit.

3.In the case of the D700 Invincible Rabbit, Nikon's focusing system is more effective than Canon's when it comes to continuous focusing.

4.Both cameras have a similar market position, both are entry-level full sets.

5.Canon's prime lens is strong, and Nikon's prime lens isn't weak either.

6.Canon's Invincible Rabbit High ISO is slightly inferior to the Nikon D700.

7.Nikon D700The doubling of pixels is not a simple multiple, there are many problems involved, and the invincible rabbit who is superior and inferior can only be compared when the actual machine comes out!

8.It can be seen with the naked eye.

10.The image sensor of both cameras is more advanced than that of the Invincible Rabbit.