Why is the Guizhen Church s live bear bile being questioned by the public?

Let's ask the landlord: Do you say that bile can't replace it after careful investigation, or is it just hearsay? It's because there are too many superstitions like your natural medicine that can lead to such a tragedy.

Yes, we eat pork, but do we cut a piece of the pig when we want to eat it and leave it alone? It's not so cruel! And what about live bears for bile?

I don't need to talk about this fact anymore, you can find it if you look for it, it's a kind of abuse!! A kind of annihilation of humanity!! It is recommended that you carefully understand the situation in this regard before commenting, and do not lose your precious conscience.

In a word, interests! But it is necessary to find out who and whose interests.

What organization in the world represents overseas interests, ostensibly caring for the "Chinese bear", but in fact for the interests of "foreigners";

Guizhentang, whether state-run or private, represents China's national enterprises, it does not matter whether it is listed or not, what is important is that it represents the interests of Chinese enterprises and the interests of Chinese!

The same thing, the controversy over Japan's ocean-going whale fishing, is the same. This is a matter of Japan's interests and the interests of "foreigners"!

I don't understand, all Japanese people can defend Japan's interests and support ocean-going whaling; China raises bears for bile by itself, and some people actually say "no bears", strange thing! Don't the Chinese have their own interests? ）

It is not a matter for live bears to take bile; There are too many "brainless" people who are supported by a full meal, and it has become a thing!

Live bear bile should be retained, but regulated.

Can you imagine, which of the drugs we use today have not been tested on animals? Isn't it more cruel to have a painful death or even vivisection of an animal that is used for testing than to take the bile from a live bear? Should we also refuse to use current drugs because they have been cruelly tested on animals?

Also, in order to obtain deer antlers, isn't it cruel that we sawed off the horns of the deer that grew well? The production process of foie gras is probably more cruel than the extraction of bile from a live bear! Isn't it cruel to keep filling the feed since childhood, so that the goose liver grows abnormally fast and swells, just to obtain foie gras?

People come first! Protecting animals, maintaining ecological balance, and protecting the environment are all for people!

Animal cruelty "what's wrong with it is better than starving people to death." Western Europe was developed, out of some animal protection organizations, the 16th and 18th centuries capital plundering we probably forget. How many animals have become extinct in Africa, Australia and the Americas have been documented.

Let's just eat vegetarians in the future, and remember to report more real war reports from grassroots amblyopia groups.

While hugging for the bear that took the gall, he was eating big fish and meat, laughing.

I also agree with the landlord's words! On the other hand: a lot of rumors say that dandelions, messy things can be used instead of bear bile.

But I think it's all! If Guizhen Soup really uses these things instead of bear bile and sells some ordinary herbs for thousands of yuan a tael, the ghost will still buy his products? He's still in a bird market.

In the future, people who want to eat deer antler velvet and bear bile will not be able to eat it. Humanity has gone back to a primitive society.

Artificially bred and raised, and raising deer for antlers, social blood donation, organ transplantation, it is not to cherish endangered animals, but to promote the protection of wild populations of safe reproduction, is conducive to the development of human social civilization, there is no need to dispute on this issue. Stand up!

Support the Guizhen Church, do not live bears to take gall to cure diseases and save people, do you want to kill bears to take gall?

If you don't take bear bile, what medicine will you take when you get sick in the future, and if you don't take bile artificially to supplement the market demand, there will be more wild bears to kill, please don't take noble sentiments to look at this matter, if the live bear is still remnant, then you should really look at the scene of killing pigs and sheep, don't use your noble sentiments to deny this matter, unless you yourself no longer eat meat in the future.

... Now the bear farm I've been to. None of them still have iron vests. It's all the same as the one in the Guizhen Church. Tubeless drainage. I don't see any pain!

How many eggs and pork have you eaten since you were a child, and all kinds of animal experiments are not cruel compared to this?

I think、Just、Qiu Shuhua、Locked up in a cage、2 times a day live people to try it!! Also listed! The whole family is in retribution! Don't hurt the critters! Humans are the greatest demons!!

It's useless to say anything, since it is artificially bred, it is a quantifiable population, and what is the difference between pigs, sheep, cows, and horses.

When you kill a pig, it hurts to bleed the pig, or you take bile from the bear.

This is originally a matter of public saying that the public is justified and the mother-in-law saying that the mother-in-law is reasonable, and there is a reasonable side and an unreasonable side on both sides, which is easy to cause controversy, so it will cause a topic.

1. As an enterprise, it has an advertising effect, so that the live bear can take bile to be publicized and widely publicized to achieve its economic interests;

2. As news, it wants to attract attention and cause widespread controversy in the society, so that the newspaper can be sold and TV can increase ratings;

3. As far as this incident is concerned, animal protection organizations are of course against it, because this kind of thing may be new to them, of course, it is **; On the other hand, the biological chain is the law of the jungle, and people raise chickens, pigs, cows, sheep, rabbits, ......And so on, not only for appetite, but also for the body to be strong and nutritious. This incident was supposed to take the bear's bile to treat people, not to kill the bear to take its gall, and some people are really a bit nitpicky.

As a journalist, we should not reflect opinions from just one angle, but reflect the two sides of things, and leave it to society to think and judge. To judge the quality of a thing should consider the environment and limited conditions, I think that when people's needs are more important than the interests of bears, such as curing diseases and saving people, then it is right to stand on the position of people; If people just take bear bile for entertainment and do meaningless things, then there is no morality in this matter; If you stand in the bear's position, of course, all the harm that people do to it is immoral or even "cruel".

I think it's still a question of the collision of economic and social interests. If you want to be newsworthy, you can consider a report on the subsequent value utilization of bear bile, and do a comparative report on the removal of bear bile from live bears and the replacement of bear bile from plants, so that people can understand the harm.

How to go about the follow-up marketing of Guizhentang, now on the cusp, how can it sell better, or be suppressed.

Leigh: It's really the bile of a live bear.

Cons: Harm to animals.

Actually, everything has a different answer behind ......

I think this article tells us the answer.

In the past, there was no boycott because the problem was not exposed, so the public didn't know about it, and everyone didn't know how to boycott it. Its development still shows that there is a market demand. Although the boss of this company is not good, he has not violated the law or the law after all, although we are not not law-system-country, and we don't need to have any law, and law, but it has not touched any serious relationship.

So no one has to let it close. Unless it can make the society and society not harmonious, it will be harmonized and eliminated. Besides, even if it is listed, it can be resisted, and not all listed companies can make money.

As for the upstairs, it is human nature to eat meat. All life has the right to live, including you. Just because we kill other lives in order to survive doesn't mean that we don't respect life, or that we can abuse other lives at will.

People want to be human, you don't have a basic humanity, you don't respect life itself, and others can't respect you.

The matter of Guizhentang is no longer in line with the normal logic, let's study, there are some varieties of traditional Chinese medicine that are obtained from animals, including Ejiao, which is made of donkey skin.

At the beginning, American capital used various means to attack India's local medical treatment, and after killing India's local medical treatment, it then sold medicine.

Foreign forces want to crack down on traditional Chinese medicine, including the EU's complete ban on traditional Chinese medicine entering EU countries.

The logic of farting, the active ingredient of bear bile can be synthesized artificially long ago. Chickens, ducks, fish, pigs, cattle and horses are a link in the human food chain, and are they the same thing as bears? You two-to-one baskets figure it out and then talk.

The main function of bear bile is to clear heat and detoxify, brighten the eyes, and relieve spasms. It is used for children's fever, convulsions, convulsions, jaundice; Externally used to treat carbuncles, hemorrhoids, and red eyes. The encyclopedia did not find out what is necessary to need bear bile, the wild life span of bears is generally 20-30 years, the zoo heard that it can be more than 40 years old, but has there been a life of 10 years old in Guizhen Church?

Guizhentang talks about pain or not, but dare to talk about lifespan? The upper limit of the Guizhen Church said that all the opponents are extreme animal protectors, and I really fainted. I don't have a duck pear for eating other animals, but abuse just can't.

It's like killing the opponent on the battlefield, we have nothing to say, but like Unit 731 will scold and say that now there is no lower limit to their morality, and what the current Guizhen Church is doing is stronger than 731, please tell me these experts.

None of you have ever eaten pork, but who has ever seen a pig disemboweled? Chickens, ducks, fish, and sheep are not!

It's okay to kill pigs and eat meat, but it's not okay to raise bears to take bile to cure diseases?

The same is life !!

I object to the pumpkin argument, because the relationship between man and the creatures in his own food chain is adapted to the law of the jungle, and here, human beings must abide by the law based on survival, which is also the embodiment of the nature of any living being, and the relationship between man and the black bear is no longer a simple relationship on the food chain. People oppose the abuse of black bears, because people have enough security for their survival, so that we are qualified to pay attention to humanitarianism, which is considered social and human progress, and we should support it. The continuous improvement of moral standards is actually beneficial to the development and progress of mankind in the end.

If you learn to respect the life of an animal and not trample on it, you will learn to respect other people without harming them.

And I don't agree with the rhetoric you scolded verylament, I am from the school debate team, your statement is the concept of stealing in sophistry, what is the reason for the war of aggression against China? It is their inhumane atrocities in China, and if they only deflect the economic crisis and save their country without much harm to the Chinese, it is estimated that not many Chinese will hate them. Because it is not necessarily wrong to harm other nations for the sake of one's own nation's development, everyone understands that the law of the jungle eats the strong.

So I would like to say that it is difficult to say how wrong the Nazis and Japan were to protect their country just to deflect the economic crisis. They are wrong about the sins of inhumanity and moral decay! I think that animal protection is a microcosm of human beings to maintain and improve their morality and humanity in their hearts, and that human existence and development will always harm other lives, but we can respect or respect, leave beauty and concessions for other lives, and also leave a way for morality and humanity in our hearts.

It is undeniable that you are an angry young man with ideas, but there are many good ideas to do bad things, and many things exist because of objective reality, not necessarily reasonable, unreasonable, and will always disappear in the future, or unreasonable factors will disappear, or the subject will disappear, understand?

The listing is about to be made public... Most people know, and perhaps many of the authorities know it ... The benefits are great.

On the afternoon of February 15, there was a ** citation from the Chinese Medicine Association that the Guizhentang Bear Farm was about to be officially opened. On the 16th, the relevant units will hold a press conference in Beijing to announce the opening of hundreds of legal bear farms in China, which means that the ban on the opening of bear farms in the early 90s of the Ministry of Forestry will come to an end.

On February 15, the second round of "It**" signature collection has been more than 4,200 Weibo**, including cross talk actor Xu Deliang, famous host He Jing, Liu Sijia, etc.

On February 14, 72 celebrities including Bi Shumin, Cui Yongyuan, Chen Danqing, Ding Junhui and other 72 celebrities submitted a letter of appeal to the Letters and Visits Office of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, opposing the listing of Guizhentang.

On February 1, the Issuance Supervision Department of the Growth Enterprise Market of the China Securities Regulatory Commission released the basic information table of IPO application enterprises. In this list, Guizhen Church is impressively listed, and it is ranked 28th.

Some analysts questioned that Guizhentang violated the provisions of the "Administrative Measures for Initial Public Offerings and Listings".

Article 12 of the IPO Measures stipulates that "the issuer's production is in accordance with the national industrial policy". The Ministry of Health has clearly stipulated that health products using bear bile powder as raw materials will no longer be approved.

Article 14 of the IPO Measures states that "there is no change in the issuer's business environment that affects its profitability". In recent years, the relevant authorities have promulgated laws and regulations to restrict the use of bear bile, and at the same time, the market environment for bear bile products has also undergone great changes.

Article 26 of the IPO Measures stipulates that "the issuer shall not engage in any act that harms the public interest within three years". According to ** reports, there are bear bile tea-related products in a Guizhentang direct store in Xiamen City, Fujian Province. This product does not have an approved health food name.

Some industry insiders believe that Guizhentang may not be disqualified from listing, because the CSRC only investigates the listing documents and does not involve ethical review, and as long as it is a legally existing company, it may be approved for listing.

Chen Bo, director of the Southwest ** M&A Headquarters, said that purely from the perspective of listing qualifications, the industry in which a company is engaged belongs to the industry encouraged by the national industrial policy, and the historical evolution of equity is legal and valid, and the company's main performance does not have false fraud, and the historical performance can prove that the company has the ability to operate sustainably, and it should theoretically have the qualification for listing. The main responsibility of the listed company and the sponsor is to fully disclose the company's main business, operating performance and risks, and investors need to bear the risks of the listed company's operation under the premise of full disclosure of the listed company.