Canon 600D, want to have a lens that covers both the wide angle and telephoto ends?

Now there are 18-270 with a larger zoom on the market, and 4680 is determined. Connecting the actual focal length of 600d is no problem with telephoto end shooting the moon, and the wide angle is enough, which is very suitable for walking the world with one lens. However, the higher the zoom ratio, the lower the image quality.

If you care about picture quality, the red circle is only 17-40 for Canon.

If I use it myself, I will choose Canon.

I've used it for 2 years 17-85 is very good, this is an upgraded version, and the focal length image quality is right for this**.

This kind of lens shoots the **, to be honest, it's not very good SLR is a professional camera, what is professional? The professional is to use the wide-angle head for the wide angle, and use the head of the telephoto for the telephoto. The reason why many people like fixed focus is because fixed focus is better than zoom!

Like the one you are looking for, it is a telephoto and a wide angle, everything is not fine, everything is not professional, there is money to buy this, you might as well match a better fixed focus or medium telephoto, such as Xiaoxiaobai 5k You can buy a Xiaoxiaobai, and then a small spittoon, and the ** that comes out is definitely better than if you buy that 18-270mm!

Of course, some people say that I don't care about the quality, I just don't want to bring a lot of lenses, so I have to answer your question, and the deputy factory only has Tenglong 18-270, which is on the first floor.

Canon's, there's an 18-200mm one depending on how you choose.

The half-frame machine with the 17-40 is indeed luxurious enough, the 17-40 is a red-circle EF lens, although it is suitable for full-frame and half-frame cameras, but only the full-frame machine can fully play its functions, and the quality is not to be said; If you shoot landscapes, 17-40 is enough, its wide-angle end can shoot a lot of large scenes, and the picture is very clear, of course, considering the lens conversion factor, 17-40 equivalent focal length is 27-64, then it is not optimistic, you know, many large scenes need a focal length of 24mm or less.

10-22 is an EF-S lens, designed for half-frame cameras, the equivalent focal length is 16-35, which is enough, but not affordable, it is useless to change to full-frame cameras, and when you want to shoot distant scenes, it is very difficult, and you may not be able to shoot at all.

It is recommended that the landlord buy a -200 EF-S lens, practice first, and ensure that he can shoot various scenes. Don't buy a lot of EF-S lenses, so it's useless to upgrade to a full-frame camera, if you want to buy a red-circle lens, it's better to wait for the camera to be replaced with a full-frame camera! And the aperture of 17-40 is still a little smaller, so it's better to buy a 16-35 one.

10-22 shoots good scenery, 17-40 quality is certainly better than 10-22, but for Canon, 17 is still not wide enough.

However, the Canon's low-end device is good for portraits and not landscapes because the colors are lighter.

Also, you've used a wide-angle zoom lens, so will you feel top-heavy with an entry-level camera?

Nikon is better suited to the landscape. Nikon's colors are more vibrant, and you will feel amazing when shooting landscapes. You might as well choose D7000 + 10-24, it is much better to shoot the wind shadow than 600D + 10-22.

17 40 is not as good as 16 35, but there is also a lot of silver.

For 600d, 17 40 and 16 35 do not have the advantage of ultra-wide angle at all, so it is better to buy 10 22 if you like tourist scenery, ** is not high, and there is an ultra-wide angle.

SLR is a money-burning hobby, and upgrading after 600D may burn even more money: if you don't upgrade to full-frame, you won't be reconciled, and you can't use the lenses that upgrade to full-frame and APS format lenses (EF-S).

If you definitely want to buy the full frame in the future, you can buy the 1740L first, although the strength can not be fully played, but the imaging quality is still very good, the distortion is small, the color is good.

If you don't buy 100% full-frame in the future, why don't you buy the EFS1585 or EFS1755, in the APSC grade, they are both PK lenses with the 1740L, the former has a double focal length, and the latter has a larger aperture. It's much better than 1740L.

1. If you are not ready to rise the full width in the future, 10-22;

The 40 performs equally well on a half-frame machine and retains its value;

3. If you are ready to travel all over the world, 18-200

It's better to buy a set of machines directly, the lens should be 18-135, or your lens will not be enough in the future, friends bought 17-40, and then they all went to match an 18-250, and it is recommended that you take a look at 650d

Or the whole 17-55, constant aperture! The scenery should be imposing, so a wide angle is important.

Hello! Hand in hand only.

There are several models of wide-angle lenses for Canon 600D.

For example, the Canon Value Potato Liquid Travel Head EF-S 18-135mm F is lens with IS anti-shake system is only 2340 yuan.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm F is a product released by Canon in the fall of '09 and is lightweight and portable with a wide range of applications. Compared with the 18-55mm sleeve, this lens has a larger zoom magnification, which is more suitable for landscapes, portraits and other subjects.

This lens can be used as an "on-hook lens" for the Canon 600D.

The 15--85mm wide-angle lens is equivalent to the focal length of 24-135mm in the 35mm format.

Do you want to get a wide-angle lens for the 600D?

The 600d is a cross-sectional body, and the lens is equipped with the conversion coefficient to be multiplied. So if you want a large angle of view, you have to buy an ultra-wide-angle lens, such as 10-22 and the like.

If you mentioned in your question that you want to buy a regular wide-angle lens, then in addition to the kit lens like the -135, the 17-85 or 15-85 can also be used.

As for CPL, it is mainly used to eliminate reflections from the water surface and glass, and can also make the sky bluer;

The gradient filter is mainly used to solve the problem of large light ratios;

UV lenses are mainly used to protect lenses;

ND mirrors can reduce the amount of light entering the light;

The various filters are used for different purposes, and you can choose according to your shooting situation and shooting creativity.

If it is a normal lens, a UV lens is less necessary.

CPL and gradient lenses are very useful when shooting landscapes, and ND lenses are essential if you want to use a wide aperture or shutter when the light is strong during the day.

Hehe, I can see that you are a newbie.

Let's start with a few concepts.

1. Wide-angle: 600d is non-full-paired, and the conversion factor is 1 6 Theoretically, the focal length of a wide-angle lens is generally 38-24 mm and the angle of view is 60-84 degrees, and the focal length of an ultra-wide-angle lens is 20-13 mm and the angle of view is 94-118 degrees.

According to the 38 focal length, it is 38 1 6, which is probably less than 24 focal length, and you can get a wide angle on your machine.

So 55 250 simply can't get out of the wide angle.

2. Take a photo: Canon's image stabilization is IS, Canon is lens image stabilization, and the body does not prevent shake, so when you choose a lens, you should choose a lens with is an anti-shake lens. In addition, the motion ah, whatever, the ghosting you are talking about is not a problem of anti-shake balance nucleus hole without anti-shake, it is a problem of shutter speed, simply put, when your shutter speed is faster than the speed of the object moving, then you can freeze this moment, hehe.

Three lenses: The lens you mentioned above is a Canon entry lens, commonly known as a dog's head, Canon three puppies: 18 55 55 250 50 1 8

It is recommended that you first figure out the relationship between aperture, shutter, focal length, and image stabilization.

Also, if you're planning to play photography instead of having an attitude of being able to take pictures, then I suggest you consider going into the red circle. Expensive naturally has a reason for being expensive, and the effect of the film is much worse. You can choose 17 40 Little White.