If you want to buy a Canon 600D, you mainly want to take your child to the park to take pictures, an

It is recommended that 600d+18-135 set of machines, I have used this head, it is very suitable for family use, I just saw **, with a ticket set of 6759 yuan.

Now that you have thought about it, you can buy 600d and accept 18 135, you use it at home, then 600d + 18 135 is not expensive now.

Depending on what you need to buy, 40d, don't buy those old things.

And Nikon's D5100 you can check out.

If you can't have two heads, 18-135 is recommended, because although it is good to shoot people, after all, there is no wide angle, and the use is very limited. If you can, increase the budget appropriately and go on again.

In fact, it is enough to shoot the head of 18-55 in normal times.

You said to shoot children, why do you want such a telephoto?

Just use the original lens.

There will always be a pullover that is unique but advantageous.

It's said that it's a novice, and I hope you don't spend unnecessary money.

600d+18-135 and another 50, enough for you to use it for a long time.

18-55 I have used this head, and it is very aggrieved if it is not near or far. It is not recommended to enter.

18-55 bar It's cheap 55 The telephoto end is a common end for portrait photography.

You can go to Jingdong to take a look, the above ** are relatively low, and there are all kinds of collocations and choices.

600D is not as cost-effective as 550D

The 18-135 lens is sufficient, but average.

Canon 18-135, wide range of applications, both landscape and portrait, high picture clarity Family travel is more convenient, the focal length range is wide, and it is very easy to use!

Yes, it is suitable for general family travel, but if you pursue picture quality, it is poor.

If the Canon 600D is paired with an 18-135 lens, the actual focal length is 600D in C format.

The zoom range ranges from wide angle to telephoto, and in actual use, the focal length is determined according to the content of the shot.

1. Use a wide-angle focal length for large panoramas.

That is, use 18 end adjustment control.

2. Choose 28-50 for portraits

Adjust the control at this range of focal lengths.

3. Take a long shot with about 100.

Adjust the controls within this focal length range.

Please be specific, do you know how to operate? Do you still think this configuration is suitable for shooting**?

Now that I have 18-55, I recommend 3 lenses if I buy them again.

1: Tamron 17-50, a very good sub-factory lens, enhances the imaging effect on the original focal length.

2: The original 15-85, the wide-angle and telephoto are extended in both directions, and the image quality is improved. Ranked second in the C amplitude standard change.

3: Original 24-105, constant f4 large aperture, equivalent 35mm variable pitch of 38-165, the wide angle is slightly smaller, but can be supplemented with the existing 18-55. The telephoto expands more, and the comprehensive imaging rises.

The above is a general direction, you can refer to it.

Answer: 50 is the best point for C, but it should be noted that the focal length on C-frame is 80, it doesn't matter outdoors, if the indoor space is not too large, the panoramic or even medium view will not be able to shoot. A little bit of caution is needed. The imaging is average, that is, the aperture is large and cheap. If you don't have a lot of money, you can buy one.

The small spittoon is EF 50mm, a large aperture fixed focal head, for the poor, about 600 pieces. **Cheap and sufficient.

The small spittoon is a fixed focal head, very cheap, only a few hundred yuan, to say that it is definitely not comparable to the expensive one, but it is also very good to use, and it can be used for portraits

The small spittoon portrait is good, ** as long as more than 600.

It can be purchased, and it performs very well after the aperture is reduced.

The disadvantage is poor workmanship, and full open still imaging is poor.

Sigma 50 This is good, more than 2500 in Hong Kong.

Small spittoon. Not bad. Good value for money. It's a good shot.

Portrait-only? When you shoot portraits, you can choose the lens to be pulled to the nearest with 18-55mm, and move the person back and forth to change the aspect of the image size and make the background blur.

Your camera is mainly for portraits, not suitable for shooting scenes and portraits beyond 15 meters, your camera is suitable for shooting close-up landscapes or portraits, 5-8 meters works best, and the macro is also very easy to use, it has nothing to do with the lens, as long as you are familiar with it, you can do it, you are the best product for semi-professional photography enthusiasts!

Your needs are clear, and that's good.

First of all, if you want to take a group photo, then you need a wide angle, and the 18mm end of the 18-55 head has a viewing angle of about 70 degrees, which is enough to meet the needs of small-scale group photos. In terms of scenery, the wide angle is also an essential factor, so this head is very suitable for both.

Secondly, people in life, does this refer to portrait photography? If so, this head can only be said to be good, but if you are just a beginner, you don't have to care too much about those "portrait king" lenses, first master the basic photography skills, and then consider the equipment.

18-135 I personally think this head is completely meaningless, it is really better to buy this head than to buy a high-powered home machine, one is lighter, and the other is that the effect of some home machines may be better than the effect of this head film.

The 600d+18-55 set is enough for your use, and if you are not an audiophile, you can meet it.

Finally, I will send me a film I shot with this head, I hope it can help you.

It's enough, don't shoot small things, don't shoot things far away, and the small sleeve is enough.

Not satisfied, it is recommended that the Tamron 17-50 is very good.

The key is to figure out three issues whether to buy a set of cameras or to match them yourself, one is the biggest difference between buying a set of cameras and matching them with lenses; the second is what you are mainly using to shoot; The third is what you personally like. 1. The set lens is suitable (usually the focal length is relatively complete, such as 18-135mm), affordable (relatively cheap), and easy to carry to meet the needs of most people who love photography, and do not have high requirements for special shooting, or are not financially affordable. Therefore, the wide angle of such lenses is not wide enough, the telephoto is not long enough, the aperture is not large enough, the manufacturing process and accuracy are not high enough, and the imaging quality is average, especially for some special (special) shooting, which cannot be compared with special lenses.

2. What do you mainly use for shooting? If it is a daily family life and work scene shooting, the quality requirements are not very high, and the 18-135mm set can be satisfied, otherwise the special lens can better meet the needs of different shooting, otherwise it will lose the significance of the SLR can replace different lenses. 3. If you just want to get a SLR with better quality than DC, more artificial setting functions, more convenient, and don't want to play too professionally, just go on the 18-135mm set.

If you want to play professionally and have higher requirements for some shooting, you must have special lenses for your needs. However, as a beginner to SLR, it is still very good to use a set of lenses like 18-135mm as a practice, anyway, you are not very clear about shooting and lenses, even if you use a professional lens, it may not be able to play its role, it is better to use an affordable 18-135mm lens to practice first, and when you are familiar with your hands, you know what lens you need, and it is better to use a special lens for targeting. Wish.