When a person dies, his blood is exhausted, his essence is extinguished, his body is decayed, and he

Wang Chong's "On Balance".

He criticized the theory of ghosts and deists and advocated atheism.

The emphasis on "sincerity" and "true beauty" in the article is correct, but Wang Chong overemphasized, which led to his correction of literary exaggerations, which backfired and the truth turned into a fallacy. Wang Chong called exaggeration "increase", and in his book "On Balance", he listed three special articles: "Language Increase", "Confucian Increase", and "Art Increase", and dissected and criticized exaggeration: "The world's suffering, suffering from words and things increase in fact, writing and rhetoric, reciting the truth of the words, calling the beauty more than the good, and the evil without its sin."

Why do people always like to "increase"? Wang Chong thinks that this is the curiosity of the world, and he always "thinks that when he hears it, he thinks it is ten, and when he sees a hundred benefits, he thinks it is a thousand, and he thinks that he is simple. Based on this viewpoint, Wang Chong denied and criticized many literary exaggerations, myths and legends in ancient books, such as "The Book says 'Concord All Nations', the "Poem" says 'hundreds of billions of descendants'", and the "Huainanzi" contains the "Huainanzi" that the co-foreman could not touch the mountain, Yao made Yi shoot for nine days, and so on.

On the issue of exaggeration, the intuitive and mechanical weakness of Wang Chong's materialism is fully exposed: he blindly emphasizes authenticity and ignores the particularity of literary and artistic authenticity. Of course, Wang Chong still has some affirmation of the exaggeration in the scriptures.

However, this does not mean that Wang Chong has a correct understanding of artistic exaggeration, and the reason why he affirms the "increase" in the scriptures is that he is confined to the traditional concept that "judging words is better than saints, and scriptures are not easy for all eternity". This just exposes the limitations of Wang Chong's thinking.

Disagree, death, exhaustion, ashes, decay, and earth speak only of the body, the soul.

But he will not die. It's in the moment of death.

Detached. And out, it is for ghosts.

3. Superstitious ghosts.

4. Feudalism prevailed in the Jin Dynasty.

The reason why a person is born is because he has inherited the essence, and when a person dies, the essence does not exist. It is the bloodline that can become the essence of the gods. When a person dies, his blood is exhausted, and when his blood is exhausted, his essence does not exist, and when his essence does not exist, his body decays, and when his body decays and turns into dust, how can he become a ghost?

People don't know anything if they don't have ears and eyes, so the deaf and the blind, like plants and trees, leave the human body, ** just like people don't have ears and eyes? When it decays, it will die out, and it will become a trance and invisible body, so it is called "ghosts and gods". The physical ghosts and gods that people see are not originally created by the spirits of dead people.

Why? Because ghosts and gods are the name of such things as "absurdity", hail filial piety. After death, the essence of people returns to nature, and the bones return to the source and are buried in the soil, so it is called "ghosts and gods".

Ghost means to return; God means absurd. I still basically agree with this point of view.,Ghosts and gods may be the illusion of human thoughts.。。

D test question analysis: according to the meaning of the question, the person in the question dies and the blood is exhausted, the essence is extinguished, the body is decayed, and the decay becomes dust, what is the use of ghosts, it is a materialist point of view, the point of view of option A does not match the meaning of the topic, the prosperity must decline, and the prosperity must be abolished, emphasizing the mutual transformation of the two sides of the contradiction, so it is excluded. Option B is idealistic and therefore excluded.

The view of option C emphasizes the mutual transformation of the two sides of the contradiction, so it is excluded. The point of view of option D is consistent with the topic, the qi of the five elements, the intersection of heaven and man, and the embodiment of materialism, so it was selected.