A few simple English problems to solve

Of course, both may and perhaps are prepositions, and if you can use maybe, you can use perhaps, psThat's what everybody says.

They are the third-person accusative, and their is the possessive pronoun that indicates theirs (they represent them, feel it).

You didn't underline, I guess it's theirs, which means their classroom, which is an abbreviated usage, similar to mine, hers, choose c, shoes is plural, so use them, jim is a boy, and use him.

OK. Because there is not much difference between the two, and both can be at the beginning of the sentence.

Because they are the accusative form of they, they are used as objects here.

3.Find the underlined sentence.

They refer to jim

Identification completed.

1,.There is basically no difference between the two, both are adverbs, but may is mainly used in colloquial language, not in formal situations.

It is the possessive pronoun, they are the accusative, on is the preposition, and the preposition should be followed by the accusative, so they should be used, and the possessive pronoun should be followed by the noun.

3.I didn't understand the title.

It can be seen from are that shoes are plural, so they are used as male names, hence the use of him

It won't be different, you can have it or not, because this is the current when it is completed, that is, it has been eaten. Looking at the personal expression, the meaning will not change. Mainly look at the English expression.

"了" indicates that the action occurred in the past and is now completed, which coincides with the present perfect tense. So it's going to be added.

Translated from English to Chinese, you have to play at least this sentence according to some of our Chinese habits, its meaning should be achieved, and the words should be smooth on this sentence. I have finished eating, for our Chinese habit, in fact, it is not smooth, you can say that I have finished eating, I have finished eating.

Whether it is added or not has no effect on the meaning of the sentence.

Moreover, we should not use Chinese thinking to understand the translated English meaning.

That is to say, in English, there is no difference between the meaning of having eaten and having eaten.

Buckle words, which are characteristic of Chinese characters, do not exist in English.

English is about being direct, and expressing what you want to express directly.

In fact, in some ways, English language is more concise than Chinese.

For this sentence, we just need to know that it is in the present perfect tense, in the active voice, is enough.

The most important thing about English sentences is to understand tense and tense.

I have finished eating is the present perfect tense, and I have finished eating is the past tense.

Contextually translated, in accordance with our normal language.

Be sure to add it, otherwise the English is not right.

Should you use the past perfect tense.

1 Literal translation: When something first starts, there will always be mistakes. Personally, I think it can be translated"It's hard to get started".The meaning of initial has the meaning of beginning, initially, initially.

2 Translation: Professor, I know you have a foolproof plan. policy means policy, policy. absence is taken in the middle of the sentence"Missing"Together, it is a strategy with no drawbacks. So it can be translated like this.

3 anything in the middle of the sentence"Whatever"meaning, just like everything. Therefore, the 3rd person singular should be modified with wants.

initial, capitalized; Voucher.

Nonsense. That's not how I learned English.

Garbage questions.

was able to pass the english exam.(Same meaning).

tom (managed to) pass the english exam.

tom (succeeded in) passing the english exam.

he and i are going aboard.(Same meaning).

he and i) are going abroad.

we (are both) going abroad.

not only) he (but also)i am going abroad.

he (as well as) i is going abroad.

1。The whole sentence is in the past tense, so sare should fill in the past tense.

2。A comma cannot connect two complete sentences, and a conjunction. When I was walking along the street is not a complete sentence, it is a temporal adverbial clause, and this sentence is a compound sentence.

stranger_stared___at me as if he had konwn me.is the main clause of this sentence, and the sare should be in the predicate form, so there is no question of stranger being active and staring.

is an intransitive verb, there is no passive, but the sentence is active.

When I was ten years old,I learned to ride a bicycleThis sentence is the same sentence as the above sentence, when leads the time adverbial clause, followed by the main clause, talking about the past, so the main clause predicate verb uses the simple past tense ed

The full form of this sentence: 1) He saw that three boys who were nervous were getting on the bus

The concise form of this sentence: 2) he saw three boys who were nervous getting on the bus

Basics: A main clause or clause generally has only one predicate verb (i.e., a verb in the tense).

Sentence analysis: 1) He saw that three boys who were nervous were getting on the bus

This sentence has three predicates: saw (past tense), were getting on (past continuous tense), so this sentence has one main clause and two clauses.

Main sentence: He saw that three boys were getting on the busSubject-verb-object, the object is the that-led clause.

Object clause: that three boys were getting on the bus.

Determinative clause: who were nervous, modifying boys.

2）he saw three boys who were nervous getting on the bus.

This sentence has two predicates: saw (past tense), were (past tense), (note that vgetting is a non-predicate verb, there is no tense, it cannot be a predicate), so this sentence has a main clause and a clause.

Main sentence: He saw three boys getting on the busGetting on the Bus adds the state of the object boys. ）

Determinative clause: who were nervous, modifying boys.

He saw three boys nervously getting on the bus.