Chen Baoguo s typical positive charity character in Old Chinese Medicine , how do you feel?

I think it's also quite positive, very good.

Yes, I think he played it very well.

I like it a lot, the old drama bones are just different.

I like Chen Baoguo's temperament, which is low-key and connotative.

The acting skills of the old drama bones are always so strong, and I like this role very much.

This is the characteristic of the Chinese, and he has performed the wisdom and tolerance of the Chinese to the fullest.

His role is said to have been shaped by the deeds of many famous doctors at that time, reflecting the characteristics of that era and the spirit of Chinese culture.

I like his playing, it's quite like the Chinese medicine style of that era.

Low-key has connotation, like this type of bark.

once again proves that the plot is not powerful, and no matter how good the actors are, it is in vain.

Now the overall reputation of Chinese medicine is not ideal, first of all, Chinese medicine is fundamental, the cycle is long, not as effective as Western medicine at that time, so many people think that the effect is not good. The second is that there are too few people practicing traditional Chinese medicine now, and there are very few outstanding people, and there are some ** fish eyes mixed up, so the reputation is not good.

There are hard flaws in the plot, this drama is about traditional Chinese medicine, but some plots are not in line with reality, such as Chinese medicine doctors coming to ask if they want to see a doctor. There are also most middle-aged people who watch this drama, and the extramarital relationship between Chen Baoguo and Yue Xiaowan in the play will be very bad, so the reputation of "Old Chinese Medicine" is not ideal.

Because few people pay attention to Chinese medicine now, it is very bad, and it is naturally not ideal.

I think it's quite reasonable, as we all know, almost all shows have scripts, and "Old Chinese Medicine" is no exception, many things are arranged in advance by the screenwriter, so I think it's normal to give the pot to the screenwriter when I am complained.

is reasonable, because such a situation has a lot to do with the screenwriter, and this person will be complained about because of the screenwriter.

I think it's very reasonable that the screenwriter wrote them like this.

It's unreasonable, since this script can pass the review, the director must have read it, and the director is also default, and you can't just let the screenwriter take the blame.

I think it's very reasonable for this screenwriter to take the blame, because the plot of the TV series is written by the screenwriter, so the screenwriter has a lot of responsibility.

It's quite reasonable, because the plot itself feels very problematic, so the performance has also received a lot of complaints.

I don't think it's quite reasonable. But it is relatively normal for the screenwriter to take the blame.

In the process of acting, I carry a dictionary with me, and if I don't understand the lines, I will take it out and check it.

is to completely substitute himself into the role and let him become the character, so the performance is very expressive, making the audience forget about himself.

He should have read the script thoroughly, and then substituted himself into the emotions of this character.