What is the difference between Kingdee financial software and UFIDA financial software?

Compared with Kingdee, after the use of UFIDA software, if you find that the opening balance is entered incorrectly, you can reverse the checkout at any time and re-modify the opening balance, and the voucher you enter does not need to be re-entered, you can continue to use, the reverse operation is very convenient and free, not to mention the report function, the report software that the user wants to set a lot of default reports and queries, if you do not meet the user's requirements, you can also customize the report, in addition, there is a statement on the first floor, UFIDA has a project accounting function, you can easily calculate the project cost, As well as the auxiliary accounting, etc., the function is more powerful, and the version is more, whether it is a large enterprise or a small enterprise, you can really use different versions of your own enterprise, such as large enterprises can use U8, small enterprises can use UFID, the specific U8 and UFIDA version is divided into a lot of different versions, you can log in to UFIDA** in detail, you can also find local UFIDA company personnel to give you a detailed explanation, they will be careful and free to give you a detailed explanation.

As far as I know, the best financial software in China is Kingdee and UFIDA, and the strength of the two companies can be said to be equal. Kingdee's best financial software on the market is the KIS sequence, which has three versions: mini version, standard version, and professional board (from low to high). ** Varies from 3,000 to 30,000.

If you are only using financial accounts and have less fixed assets, you can use the mini version** in 3000 (I am currently using, of course, the software can be upgraded), and the standard version includes fixed assets processing, ** in about 8000 (stand-alone). If it is UF's general sequence, ** is usually around 10,000 yuan. In my opinion, UFIDA's software is more suitable for large enterprises, which usually have higher procurement budgets.

When it comes to the utility, security and stability of the software. I think the software can be made, but it can be promoted in the market, and the performance of the software itself can be trusted. However, they are also two of the largest financial software companies in China.

Find out if there is a service point for the software company in your area. Because there is a stage of adaptation to the use of the software at the beginning, the technical support of the software company is needed at this time.

In fact, these two financial software are among the best brands in the field of financial management software. If you choose, it mainly depends on your own usage habits, UFIDA is more detailed, the content is more, the database of Kingdee software is worse than UFIDA's, so it may not be as stable as UFIDA, and the actual use is almost the same, and the functions of the two products are similar. Whether it is good or not depends mainly on the quality of the implementation and service personnel, and the competent technicians can help you think of many suitable solutions, and the efficiency of solving the problem is relatively high.

Compared with Kingdee, after the use of UFIDA software, if you find that the opening balance is entered incorrectly, you can reverse the checkout at any time and re-modify the opening balance, and the voucher you enter does not need to be re-entered, you can continue to use, the reverse operation is very convenient and free, not to mention the report function, the report software that the user wants to set a lot of default reports and queries, if you do not meet the user's requirements, you can also customize the report, in addition, there is a statement on the first floor, UFIDA has a project accounting function, you can easily calculate the project cost, As well as the auxiliary accounting, etc., the function is more powerful, and the version is more, whether it is a large enterprise or a small enterprise, you can really use different versions of your own enterprise, such as large enterprises can use U8, small enterprises can use UFID, the specific U8 and UFIDA version is divided into a lot of different versions, you can log in to UFIDA** in detail, you can also find local UFIDA company personnel to give you a detailed explanation, they will be careful and free to give you a detailed explanation.

The operation steps of financial management software are done in accordance with standard accounting standards, and the process is basically the same. Therefore, the software operation is more rigorous, and there is a software that integrates finance and taxation. Kingdee has no first-class background, and the software directly designed for small and medium-sized enterprises is more flexible in operation, and it is more convenient to reverse the account and settle the account, and the interface is relatively friendly.

Therefore, if it is only a financial management software, you can use it depending on which one you use, and there is nothing to pick in terms of function. Kingdee's KIS mini version is an AESS database, and UFIDA's Caimaotong is SQL, and the former is easy to install. The set of accounts is one set of accounts a year, and there is a carryover at the end of each year, so there is not much difference.

As a financial software, Kingdee is as easy to use as UFIDA. As ERP software, they are all ERP with Chinese characteristics, so they are the same. However, the success of the ERP product has little to do with the ERP product, but only with the strength of the ERP implementation team and the ability of the enterprise itself.

Therefore, it is irresponsible to say that Kingdee is better than Friendship or UFIDA is better than Kingdee on this product. "Three points of software and seven points of service"Therefore, we are more interested in service and after-sales in our choice, and no matter how good the software is, it is useless if it is not implemented.

If you compare the functions, they are basically done in accordance with the standard accounting standards, and there is no big difference in the main functions, if you are from the perspective of learners, you prefer UFIDA, UF first of all, the name makes me feel a sense of intimacy, and then it is UFIDA's software park base, which makes people feel that although life is very ordinary and comfortable, there is always a feeling that people can create miracles in it. In fact, domestic software is carved out of a mold. Which one is easy to make and which one is easy to use.

There are a lot of things that software companies can't do, but they don't do. If UF makes the sleeve too flexible, no one will use the matching paper! UF is much stronger now than before.

At least I saw progress. The same goes for the golden disc, the interface of the golden disc is more humane than that of UF, which is better looking.

Summary: I have heard a saying in their industry before, called South Kingdee and North UFIDA, that is, there are many enterprises using Kingdee in the south and many enterprises using UFIDA in the north. The main thing is to look at the service, the financial system is the same all over the world, so there will not be any better and which one is worse, mainly than the service, each with its own characteristics.

How to choose in the end, in fact, this is based on personal operating habits and ways to decide, the software that suits you is the best software, the above content is for reference only, I hope to solve your problems!