Can you accept your husband s hope that the in laws, brother and sister in law, nephew and us live i

What you said about this matter is really difficult, she is like taking care of her parents and brother and sister-in-law, but there is no need to live together, you can buy you a two-bedroom and two-living room house first, and give his parents, brothers, brothers and sisters-in-law a house to live near you, so that it is convenient to take care of it, and there will definitely be a lot of problems when several families live together.

I don't think it's acceptable, if they live well now, then it's okay to keep the status quo, buy a big house and live together as a family, it's a burden for them, and it's also for you, the cost of living, many aspects can't adapt, if you want to help my brother's family, you can give their children a better education and help, I think they need this more.

I don't seem to be able to accept it, a family has a lot of things together, it's difficult to get along, if the parents-in-law are old, it's understandable to go to your house, brother, sister-in-law and nephew, I don't want to live with them.

No matter how big your house is, you can't accept your parents-in-law, brother, sister-in-law, and nephew living with you, and there will be a lot of contradictions. So let's live separately.

I think this kind of house is too tight and bursting, there are too many people, and then there is too much trouble, and there are too many things, so I don't like a place with too many people.

I think it's better not to live together as much as possible, it's not good to live with my in-laws, and I live with my brother and sister-in-law and nephew, so there will be a lot of friction in the future.

I think a lot of people might not be able to accept that. Because there will be some friction and contradictions when a family lives together, this is inevitable, and it is not very convenient not to be together, if it is a house for sale, it is okay to be together.

If your husband wants to live together with a large family, then if you don't want to live together, then you can suggest that your husband buy a house separately, you and your husband's family buy together, and then buy a house for your in-laws and sister-in-law, so that everyone can be happy.

It depends on what your financial ability is, if you don't have financial ability, you can accept anything, if you have your own ability, of course you don't accept it.

I think it's better to live together in a small family unit, because no matter how close the relationship is, there will always be various conflicts after being together for a long time, and if everyone lives together, there will be a lot of conflicts.

I think your husband's idea is better, but it is really implemented. It's quite disgusting, after all, it's inconvenient for so many people to live together.

It's good to get married and have your own space, a family lives together, it's inevitable to bump and bump, and it will affect the relationship for a long time! Why don't you want to break up? It's not convenient to live together!

I can't accept it either, so ask your husband if he can bring your siblings to live with him, and see how he reacts. Since you are under pressure, you don't want to buy such a big house.

Most of today's young people can't accept that so many people live together, and there are too many people and too many things to do, so they don't want many people to live together.

Can you accept that your husband wants his in-laws, sister-in-law, and nephew to live with us? It's unacceptable, there are too many people to accept.

The in-laws, brothers-in-law, nephews and nephews who can't accept their husband's hopes all live in one house. It's inconvenient to live in one house all of them.

The rights and duties of citizens are reciprocal. Therefore, the national law clearly stipulates the obligation of children to support their parents.

Whether the maintenance is equally divided with the brother-in-law depends on other factors such as one's own standard of living, and the responsibility cannot be borne by the division of property. (Of course, on the other hand, it is not a violation of the inheritance law to fulfill the responsibilities and take proper care of the division of the estate.) ）

So, the conditions you are talking about do not exist in themselves. Obligations are indivisible. If the brother-in-law has no ability to support, you still have to fulfill the full obligation to support. Because this obligation is innate.

The division of property can show your friendship with the brothers, but it is best to have no strings attached.

If it is your mother-in-law's (father-in-law's) property, he will give it to whomever he likes.

As for the question of future alimony, it is best to determine the individual's financial situation.

In addition, it is best to have a licensed lawyer go to a notary public office and both parties will notarize and write it down in person.

It's best to find a lawyer to make an agreement. High legitimacy.

After the agreement is agreed, then go to the notary office to do notarization, which is definitely valid.