Why is my Opera cold start speed on par with Firefox?

Dear users, hello! We are happy to answer your questions Any software will generate a considerable amount of garbage and historical information after a long period of use, which will indirectly slow down the running speed of the software, so developing good habits (regular garbage cleaning, resources**) will be conducive to the improvement of your software experience. I hope I have been helpful to you, and if you have any questions, please feel free to continue to consult us.

Hello! We're happy to answer your questions! You can try to uninstall and reinstall, each mainstream browser has its own advantages, the difference is not very obvious in actual use, the advantage of Firefox is that it uses the gecko kernel, which is an open-source and secure browser, with very powerful extension functions, and you can customize the browsing experience according to your needs.

Try cleaning up your history regularly. There are also extensions that are temporarily disabled that are not needed to increase the speed of Firefox.

I feel that the current opera cold start speed is far inferior to iie9, sometimes the network speed is slow, and the web page can't be opened, if you don't get used to it, you would have uninstalled it a long time ago.

The first boot after booting up is a cold start, which may be a little slower, and after closing the program, it will be much faster to start the program again.

Cold start for about 3 seconds is okay.

My OP startup is also slower.

That's what people who only pursue fast say,They don't use extensions or even only use extensions like ABP,Of course I don't think,This is a screenshot of the resource of a netizen who claims to be very fast chrome,His chrome only has a pitiful 3 processes,It's not fast to blame if you install more than five extensions,The speed of chrome will slow down significantly,The content in the tab bar and the extension bar should be delayed after the cold start of chrome to be displayed,At this time, there is no response to enter any web page., This user experience is very flattering, at least the moment the user notices that I want to open it, Chrome does pop up.

Now the gap between the cold start speed of the version is smaller, in the past, chrome cold start was really fast, and firefox was really slow. There are too many reviews about loading speed, just find a stopwatch timer** test to know, provided that the clean profile and the Internet speed is stable and fast enough, Firefox is indeed a bit of a gap.

Now the memory will not be too small,4G machines have the conditions to get a RAMdisk to play,Draw a few hundred m to put the entire profile and local cache of FF,That is, in addition to the installation directory under the program file, the FF directory is thrown in,The switch script transfers the necessary files (except cache)。 In this way, the cold start can be a level faster. Not to mention the hot start, there is no delay felt.

FF's speed doesn't feel particularly slow right now! Anyway, it's quite comfortable to use, especially now that there are more and more online banking and online banking that support FF.

Never cared about cold starts. The first thing to do when you boot up is to turn on Firefox [:14:

Besides, FF's cold start isn't slow. Now the comments on the Internet are copied.,It's all a few years ago.,But chrome gives people the visual feeling that it's going to be fast.,But it's still ff.,I think.。

But Firefox should also work on the interface, and it feels like a pause.

Back to Alyzq Firefox's fame is entirely due to free software and Google's support. Of course, free software does not necessarily mean that it is of poor quality. I use Firefox a lot, and it works great.

Various extensions can be tossed around at will. Of course, Opera is also a good thing, and the efficiency of Opera's engine block and JS execution seems to be the highest. There is a ** dedicated to testing the speed of js execution.

Firefox is written in XUL for cross-platform, not specifically optimized for Windows, and many third-party compiled versions, JS execution efficiency can be comparable to opera. Opera is not as famous as FX, it is entirely because of the original strategy, it is a proprietary software, and there is a distinction between users and the professional version, it seems that at first only those with ads did not need money. And it doesn't have Google's support, so that's it for now.

Also, those boys who replied earlier, don't put anything in your link to use Google Adsense cross-monetization. If you want to **, go directly to the official website of FX.

1. Developer Edition is the development version of Firefox.

The development version is fast, and it may be that the Firefox operator has made some startup optimization settings.

Mozilla Firefox, commonly known as "Firefox" in Chinese (formally abbreviated as FX or FX, unofficially abbreviated as FF), is a free and open source ** web browser that uses the Gecko typesetting engine and supports a variety of operating systems, such as Windows, Mac OS X and GNU Linux.

The browser is available in two editions, the Standard Edition and the ESR (Extended Support Release) edition, which Mozilla has built specifically for businesses that are unable or unwilling to upgrade every six weeks.

This is the development version.,It's estimated that Firefox has been optimized again.,There's no update in the official version.,So it's definitely slower in terms of startup speed.。

It is a version for developers, mainly used to test new features and test bugs in new versions. Not as stable as the official version. Long-term use is not recommended.

2.Find the following preference name and shout to create a new one if Zheng Kiguo doesn't have one.

Prefer to know the name of the item Status Type Preset to change the value.

Default integer 250 0

The default true value is false true

The default true value is false true

Default integer 4 8

Reopen Firefox and you'll find that it's much faster to open the web than it was before the change.

The more you expand, the slower it is, and it's better to install the opera lightly View the original post.

Firefox's cold start is really slow. The second launch was much faster. There are extensions that will prolong the startup speed of Firefox. View the original post

It's acceptable, but it's slower than opera. But the extension is quite easy to use, so it's still ff. View the original post

Try a different browser, it is recommended to use 360 Secure Browser, it is the best browser to use now, and it starts quickly.

The first launch of the browser on a machine with a kill will also be slower. [:xi33:] View the original post

Is there too much expansion [:xi23:] 33 are installed, and the startup is relatively slow View the original post

I haven't used all of these browsers,In some aspects, they have their own unique characteristics that other browsers can't do,But when it comes to overall performance,I personally think it's better to QQ browser,It uses IE new kernel,And in this system has made great improvements and optimizations,In the case of no problem with the network speed, the loading of web pages is basically a few tenths of a second,And the operation of the web page is also very smooth、Look**、Play games as well,In addition to its own unique web version of WeChat and whirlwind speed** and other applications.

1. Chrome: The system occupies the largest amount of resources (multi-process mode), the fastest startup speed, and the web page rendering speed (excluding JS second, including JS first) is fast; WebKit kernel, fully tested by W3C standards:

2. Firefox: The system occupies a large amount of resources, the slowest startup speed, the faster web page rendering speed, the fastest complex JS loop operation, and the fastest JS string splicing optimization. gecko kernel, if I'm not mistaken, the acid3 test score is only a full score for the version, and after 4 it should be 94 points.

3. Opera: The system occupies small resources, the startup speed is fast, the web page rendering speed is fast, the JS operation speed is fast, and the Presto core acid3 test is full score.

As for the browsers of other Trident cores (the kernels used by IE), because this core is older, the performance is much worse than the above 3, but the big ones will be designed for compatibility. Also, the fact that the WinAPI plugin is supported is a big plus. Many online banking systems are developed on this basis.

However, with the increasing enhancement of the other three core browsers, online banking will gradually consider porting these browsers in the future.

Chrome is the fastest, followed by Firefox and then Opera