During the Three Kingdoms period, did the two armies fight each other as they did on TV?

You type "fighting general" in the encyclopedia, and the explanation is very detailed.

Of course, the official history is not like what is said in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms Since the theory of strategy in history It is doomed that in the war, a person's strength is small Maybe you are brave and brave You are a hundred enemies or a thousand enemies Or exaggerated to the point of ten thousand enemies So what, when the manpower is finally exhausted, what the landlord said is called a fighting general in the history books First of all, we can study the logic of the fighting general The confrontation between the two armies The military heart should be the most important thing And a brave general must be of great help to stabilize the military heart But according to the fighting general, when the war is not started It is necessary to risk the loss of a general, and what is even more terrifying is that the defeat of a general before the war is undoubtedly a major blow to the morale of the army, so I personally feel that the fighting general should belong to the theory of wild history, and the war is obviously not a one-man game, and the theory of fighting the general is a bit of personal heroism

Yes, generals against generals, soldiers against soldiers.

How is it possible, if so, as soon as the general dies, who will command the army? How can dragons fight without a leader? In battle, generals will change their tactics according to changes in the situation, such as a long snake becoming a two-wing outflank.

will be planning but not brave. What are the two fighting in front of the battle on TV, fighting for 300 rounds, nonsense, if I come with a cold arrow, you will return to the west. In ancient times, there was a person with a handsome flag in his hand, and he followed the boss wherever he ran, and you said that the general led the front, and he also went, and when people looked at it, they found the position of your boss, and ten thousand arrows were fired, and you were not pierced into a hedgehog?

However, there are a few very brave generals who charge, and the premise is that they are sure of victory, otherwise I will kill you with 10,000 people, and you will be tired to death. And then there are ancient knives and armor, at most 20 pairs of your knives will be curled, what else to cut, hundreds and thousands of them on TV, is it possible? That's all I have to say, I don't know if you know.

1vs1 was a popular form of warfare during the Three Kingdoms period, and its main role was to affect morale. The so-called generals are brave, and everyone is willing to charge behind a military general with excellent martial arts, rather than being carried away by a wine bag and rice bag. Modern warfare is more about science and technology, unlike in ancient times, there are too many unstable and uncontrollable factors, of which morale accounts for a large part of these factors, and the victory of the military generals in the competition can not only destroy the morale and tactics of the other side, but also launch an attack to expand the fruits of victory, and even determine the victory or defeat of the war; In addition, during the Three Kingdoms period, the warriors of their own martial arts have been the maintenance of their reputation is very important, this is the atmosphere established by a great power in four hundred years, the Han is the most powerful dynasty in Chinese history, his social atmosphere is also the most strong, he inherited and carried forward the pre-Qin and Han Wu Guangwu belligerent legacy, which is the Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties can not be compared.

Those who went up to fight were certainly not generals.

Truly. With the style of an ancient knight. Not to kill, but to deter. Therefore, the name of the general is an immortal nameless ghost.

The general is not a pig, do you see Zhuge Liang on it. Just like in our real society, the only difference is that killing people is not a crime, and not killing people is guilty.

<> "How to fight during the Three Kingdoms period? The two armies are fighting each other head-on.

Regarding the march and battle during the Three Kingdoms, there are a lot of descriptions in "Romance of the Three Kingdoms": after Lie Liang shoots the front, the main general rides a large horse and comes forward to fight one-on-one, usually how many rounds of the battle, either one side is injured and defeated, or one side is stabbed (chopped) to death under the horse, and the winning side covers the past and defeats the other party. This is pure nonsense.

The so-called heads-up, that is, two horses gallop in the opposite direction, contact and hand is for a face, turn the horse's head and rush over and then fight, and the two faces are a round. Generally speaking, after three faces, the horse's running and sprinting cannot maintain high speed. Literary works are often rendered by heads-up and events, but official history is disdainful.

There is almost no heads-up in the twenty-four histories. The battles in the era of cold weapons have tactical principles of each period, how can the victory or defeat be determined by the main general's heads-up duel!

It can be seen that Chen Shou wrote in "Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms" that Guan Yu "saw (Yan) Liang and spurred good among the crowd" is also a compliment. The commander in chief of a unit will not rush to the forefront, because the enemy has a large number of vigorous soldiers, especially young junior military attachés and strong soldiers, which will pose a serious threat, and once the commander leading the unit makes a mistake, the contingent will fall into a situation of respectful and clear without command, and the consequences will be unimaginable.

How exactly did the Three Kingdoms fight? The war of the entire cold weapon era mainly relied on formations, and if the commanders of both sides wanted to win, the main purpose was one: to break the enemy, that is, to break the enemy's formation, so that the enemy's position was in chaos, unable to command, dispatch and cooperate, and no matter how many people there were, they would fail.

Therefore, the most practiced by soldiers in ancient times was formation, the arrangement of infantry, cavalry, bow and crossbow, attack and defense, the arrangement and scheduling of reserve troops, etc., which was a major matter related to the survival of a unit.

This question is very interesting, probably by watching the Romance of the Three Kingdoms or some other romances such as "The Romance of the Gods", which is full of heads-up descriptions and a sense of déjà vu in the picture, but how much is this authenticity?

Some netizens summed up the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms Top Ten Classic Heads-up": Zhao Yun vs Wen Chou, Xu Huang vs Guan Yu, Pang De vs Zhang He, Xiahou Yuan, Xu Huang, Xu Chu, Guan Yu vs Pang De, Guan Yu vs Huang Zhong, Sun Ce vs Tai Shici, Dian Wei vs Xu Chu, Ma Chao vs Xu Chu, Zhang Fei vs Ma Chao, Lu Bu vs Zhang Fei, Guan Yu, Liu Bei. It is estimated that because of the heads-up plot description in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, many people are convinced of heads-up, but in fact, it is not, and the reason is actually very simple:

1.Even in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, there are many battle plots, and it is not that when the two armies are fighting, the generals come up first, but most of them are military generals from both sides fighting each other in the melee. There is also the fact that even if the generals of the two sides will not move their horses, the generals of the two sides will fight alone, and the generals of both sides often ride horses back and forth to rush back and forth, even if there are generals who die in battle, such as Yan Liangwenchou and Hua Xiong, etc., they should be killed when the two sides rush into battle.

2.In the romance, the military general's heads-up is mainly to highlight the image of the protagonist, and it is easier to explain how strong the general's martial arts are, which is just a form of artistic expression. In the TV series, the generals of the two armies are more convenient to shoot, and there is no need to present a huge number of scenes of each other rushing and killing, and the production difficulty is much lower.

Many things in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms are false, because it is a **, and many things are different from historical events. In the history of the Three Kingdoms, there are not many battles that require the commanders of the two armies to fight each other before the battle. Therefore, I think that in history, it is very rare for the commanders of the two armies to fight each other before fighting.

There should be heads-up, if you win the opponent heads-up, you can boost the morale of your own soldiers and hit the morale of the enemy. The morale of a soldier is very important in fighting a war. If conditions allow, the captain of the side who is sure of victory will definitely try to go head-to-head.

If you win, you can lay a solid foundation for your victory, so why not. And this kind of behavior can give their own soldiers some courage and make them dare to fight.

I think that the two armies are going head-to-head, or to make some preparations for the soldiers in their own army, because there may be some soldiers who have not experienced war, and they need to sit down a very important psychological preparation before fighting. Therefore, the commanders of the two armies will use a heads-up method to buy some time for these soldiers. In this way, you can raise the strength of your army to a higher level.

I think there is also a role in allowing my military advisor to be able to observe the opposite formation and make some adjustments to my army's formation.

In the TV series Romance of the Three Kingdoms, such a shot was filmed. It can not only allow the audience to have a good ** experience, but also show whose army is stronger, laying the groundwork for the victorious side. This has not always happened in history.

There are probably only a handful of battles that will appear.

I think that the battle between the two armies is not a heads-up first, this is just a series of things that are arranged like this in the TV series, which can more clearly highlight the ability of the heads-up generals.

Its main purpose is to boost morale, and the general, as the leader, must bring his subordinates well, so that they are brave and not afraid of the other party.

I don't particularly understand this, as for the heads-up before the start of the war, it may be because you want to compete first, generally the one who wins, the momentum of the army is stronger, this should be a reason.

I think this is a demonstration of the fact that both armies should motivate their armies with a so-called one-man behavior, to be happier when they win, and to fight back for revenge if they lose.

I think this is mainly to provoke the excitement of the two armies first, so that the fight will be more serious.

The generals of both sides are to cheer each other's armies in momentum, and if their generals defeat each other, their own armies will be more confident to defeat each other.

This belongs to the era of cold weapons, in order to encourage your own soldiers, improve the morale of your own army and discourage the morale of the other party.

It should be the effect of boosting morale, that is, whichever general wins, the victory rate of the side is greater, and the soldiers are given some Cuba.

It may be to boost morale, and at the same time, it can also observe the other party and increase the chance of understanding the other party.

In the era of cold weapons, this kind of behavior of the generals in front of the formation is very helpful for a morale boost

There are still very few real historical records, but "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is the first historical record, and it is written in this way to highlight its role and some highlights of the role.

The truth is that the general is going head-to-head to see the strength of the other party, if one side wins, then the military spirit of that side will be stable, and the battle will basically be won.

Yes, because if the general of either side wins, it will increase the momentum of the soldiers in the army, and the soldiers will easily win the battle if they have the momentum.

In ancient Chinese warfare, there was a very unique way of warfare, called "Zhishi".

The so-called "teacher" means to challenge. When the two armies are facing each other, in order to stimulate the fighting spirit of their own soldiers, they send strong men to challenge the opponent's camp to insult and anger the enemy army and demoralize the opponent, so as to finally win the battle.

The earliest record of "Zhishi" can be traced back to the late Shang Dynasty's Wuwang War, "Chen Shi Muye, the emperor heard that the Wuwang was coming, and also sent 700,000 troops to the Wuwang." King Wu made the master and the centurion to the teacher. (Historical Records, Zhou Benji).

However, this kind of appearance on the battlefield is very, very rare, or very rare after the Spring and Autumn Period. Most of the heads-up in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms are literary imagination.

The generals of the two armies are head-to-head, I think it's true. When a group battle breaks out, it is normal for soldiers to fight with soldiers and generals.

According to historical records, from the Three Kingdoms to the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, there were indeed frequent heads-up duels, and during this period, there were many generals who liked to fight heads-up: for example, Lu Bu singled out Guo Si, Sun Ce singled out Tai Shici and so on.

Guan Yu did behead Yan Liang, indicating that the Three Kingdoms may indeed have a heads-up situation, but it is by no means a convention, the two armies are facing each other, and the generals are killed, which has a great impact on morale, and the Three Kingdoms have passed the stage of aristocratic warfare in the Spring and Autumn Period, so they don't pay attention to these.

It will definitely exist, and if the general's heads-up is successful, it will help boost the morale of the army and enhance the morale of the soldiers.

Of course, people in that era were still very particular, I remember a book I read that said that when the two armies faced each other, they would send people to fight alone.

In my opinion, the duel between the two armies in the Three Kingdoms era is a heads-up between the generals, because the leader of the troops will be uplifted after the victory, and there is also a heads-up in history when Guan Yu passes five levels and kills six generals.

Yes, because the generals at that time may be more impulsive, they may propose heads-up. Some martial arts generals are more proud, thinking that they have the best martial arts, and may also initiate heads-up.

This is possible, because if your side wins, it can be a good morale boost and blow the opponent. Generally, generals with better martial arts come to fight alone.

This kind of thing is possible, there is self-esteem among the generals, and it is not a gentleman to do more against less, and single-handedly can not only satisfy their vanity, but also encourage the momentum of the soldiers, and be invincible.