How about the Fujifilm FinePix Z91 digital camera?

Canon's A series and Fuji's Z91 are two completely different types, I don't know which one of Canon you are comparing it, **It will be more than three hundred, I recommend Canon A800 to you, by the way, I will help you compare Z91:

1. **Quite, the ** of these two models are around 800;

2. The selling points of the two models are different:

Z91 is for the fashion requirements of little girls, it is a thin and light model, and the lens is not much different from the camera of the mobile phone, and the result is that the imaging effect is relatively poor;

The A800 is Canon's low-end camera, and its low-end is defined by its unfashionable appearance and simple materials, but its imaging results are not bad;

3. From the comparison of various parameters of the two models, you will definitely think that Z91 will be much better, such as high pixels, one 14 million, the other is only 10 million, but in fact, this is exactly the reason why I recommend A800, very ordinary but very practical, there is no vain head;

4. The most regrettable thing about A800 is that there is no optical image stabilization (of course, Z91 does not), which is the most regrettable place of this model.

It's okay, not bad. Fuji feels conservative and realistic. At the same price, I recommend SonyW510, don't look at the less functions, quality first. You can take a look at the related digital products here, compare them, and then choose a digital camera that suits your use.

Refer to the comparison data of digital cameras.

You can compare Canon and Fuji here to find the answer in your mind!

You yourself said, usually family, party, take pictures with your hand to choose a cheaper, Canon A series is just like that, ordinary digital cameras are actually not much different in photo quality, you can add a thousand yuan to get on the entry mirrorless camera General life with the shooting fine{ix z91 on the line, you want to pursue picture quality is better than add money to buy an entry mirrorless or SLR

Canon and Sony have a lot to choose from, Fujifilm is okay between domestic and big brands.

Fujifilm's imaging is blurry.

Fujifilm's cameras have always been cost-effective to open the market, so far it is difficult to say the results, although the sales are guaranteed, but Fujifilm's digital camera brand recognition is increasingly becoming a low-end representative, which is inseparable from Fujifilm's strategy.

Just like the S2995 you said.

As a telephoto model with a large zoom, Sony and Canon also have similar models of HX200, SX40, etc., but ** is almost more than twice as much as S2995, so everyone will say that Fujifilm S2995 is super cost-effective.

But I don't recommend this one personally, mainly because.

1.This is a sunny day machine, 1-inch CCD sensor, such a small area sensor, not yet back-illuminated, which determines its light sensitivity is very average, indoors, in the evening, in places with complex and bad light, its imaging is very bad. In fact, you can watch samples of the S2995, and basically all of them are sunny days**.

2.It only has a screen of 230,000 pixels, and the picture is going to be very rough, and a lot of times you have to zoom in to see how it is doing. Now the 23w pixel screen of the card machine is a very outdated product.

3.It uses alkaline batteries, and now there are digital cameras that don't use lithium batteries It's rare, alkaline batteries, poor battery life, troublesome to use, large volume, and large weight, in short, it's not good.

4.Finally, there is a suspense about Fujifilm's workmanship, Fujifilm's camera repair rate is much higher than that of other brands, which we don't know what Fujifilm has shrunk in order to reduce costs, but it must have shrunk, there is no doubt about it.

In short, as a thousand-yuan telephoto machine, you don't ask for too much, after all, there are large zoom lenses for telephoto machines, but the cost performance is still acceptable, if it doesn't fail.

Fujifilm FinePix S2995 digital camera 18x light change, the king of telephoto cost performance for 988, super cost-effective, but the imaging is not as good as other cameras in the price range, but it can be competent for general family, travel and other shooting tasks.

This machine is very cost-effective, it can meet the general shooting, there are manual, macro. Home use is possible.

However, the picture quality of this machine is not bad, it is also very average. The aperture is also small, and noise is noticeable at night.

Very low, less than 1000, weigh it yourself.

The 2995 itself is positioned as a portable telephoto machine, and it is not cost-effective, it is used as a telescope.

As long as it is a new version of Fujifilm camera, it is worth buying.

More than ten years ago, I had a Fuji machine, a fool-type, and the photos taken were natural and clear. . . It's a pity that now it's digital, and that's just the point, and the imaging is absolutely top-notch

The 2995 itself is positioned as a portable telephoto machine.

The zoom is long, suitable for traveling, and cost-effective. But the tone of the film is cold and gray, and the price is good.

That's what I use. I feel like it's better for boys to use that big one around their necks.,It's cool to look at.,Now the camera is not expensive.。。 More than a thousand are better than the previous more than two thousand. It is recommended to pick a better brand...

Don't you know what about boycotting Japanese products? Scum!

The appearance is OK, but the light is very clear, and the light is a little weaker, and the noise is very much!

I used to use Samsung S600, an old machine with six megapixels, but I know that Z91 is really unclear when I compare it, and I believe it's not a technical problem with personal photography.

The camera is average, ** a little more expensive, and the standard configuration is about 900.

JD Digital is not as good as Z909.

I bought one, the picture was blurry, went to the Fujifilm repair point to check, they said this camera is like this, fainted.

Advantages: It can be set not to display ** after taking a photo, increasing the speed. The appearance is beautiful, the touch is sensitive, and the photographic effect is not bad. It's enough for daily use.

The summary is that it's good to take pictures.,It's a little worse to see which source you pay attention to.,After all, it's worth it.,It's a pretty good machine.。

I've had a bend in the air, black, and I've been using it for a few months, let's talk about it. Advantages: Fashionable and beautiful appearance, touch screen, personal impression of Fujifilm's camera is not very good, the original change of the balance is because I used to do it for the nuclear greedy cheap, I bought a S602

Fuji's, you can take a look at Fuji's z909, I recently bought it, it's very good.

The FifinePix S4530 card camera doesn't work well. The advantage is that there is a sensor type CCD

Optical zoom: 30x.

35mm equivalent: 24-720mm

4 aa battery color.

The card camera is not as good as the F665EXR digital camera and the telephoto camera has an optical zoom factor of 15x.

16 million effective pixels 》Fifinepix S4530 14 million effective pixels.

Sensor type CCD

Sensor size 1-inch digital zoom factor Outside of EXR auto mode: approx. super-resolution zoom (up to approx. 51x when using 15x optical zoom).

Mode of operation: Fully automatic.

Sensor type CMOS

Sensor size 1 2 inches 》finepix s4530. 1-inch maximum resolution 4608 3456

Movie shooting can be done using optical zoom.

Licensed Panasonic ZS15, parallel ZS20, Sony HX30.

The key to determining the positioning grade of the camera is the sensor size, but the 1500 yuan are the smallest sensors, and the effect is destined to be the same.

Under such a premise, the Panasonic ZS and Sony HX series with outstanding functions are more recommended.

S4530 is the shell to scare the layman,The actual quality、The technical gold content is not as good as Panasonic Sony's card telephoto。

Don't believe Foxconn, Foxconn doesn't have a few good products. Its first-class products are sold to Japan, the second-rate ones to Europe and the United States, and the worst ones to stay in China.

This one can only be said to be relatively cheap; The card machine has been made 30 times; For example, Panasonic ZS40, Canon SX700The current portable telephoto can already be more than 60 times. For example, the Canon SX60 SX50, Panasonic FZ70, and Sony HX400 are all good choices.