Honesty must be more ethical than deception

Honesty must be more ethical than deceptionHCP4715 knows** Yes.

The three words of truth, goodness and beauty embody people's pursuit of noble things. But when two of them conflict, which one do we value more? It seems very difficult to decide.

In fact, philosophers throughout the ages, both in China and abroad, have debated this issue extensively. One school of philosophers firmly believes that as long as the results we achieve are good, even if the means are not so reasonable, they are moral, so white lies are actually good; Other philosophers believe that certain principles should be observed absolutely, and that the whole act is unreasonable if the means are not reasonable, and that honesty is a moral principle that we should always abide by, and that white lies are immoral.

The act of lying itself is not the most important thing, but whether the act is for one's own benefit or the benefit of others. If it is for the benefit of others, the act of lying is also moral in itself, and the person who lies will not be labeled as a "bad person".

Sometimes whether or not a liar is judged to be a bad person depends on whether the liar's intentions are good. An altruistic lie is a moral lie. On a deeper level, this may reflect a moral trait of people:

When truth and goodness collide, good deeds may be more appreciated.

When good intentions conflict with the principle of honesty, people value the intention more than the principle of honesty. However, it is important to note that sometimes we cannot directly see the intentions of others, or the intentions of others are ambiguous. How do we judge in this case?

Perhaps, we will rely more heavily on the consequences of our actions, or even the underlying results, to infer the intentions of others' actions, as described in the "Nobo Effect".

Specifically, I think that as long as it does not hurt others, it is moral, even if deception is sometimes not immoral if it is based on protecting others.

There are two sides to everything, you can't be honest and moral in any way, there is a kind of white lie, but it is not excluded that it is also a lie, and some people still can't accept it, depending on what is said.

Logically speaking, honesty is undoubtedly more moral than deception, but in many cases, well-intentioned deception (or interpretation as a tactful expression of the matter) may be more respectful of the event (the person).

If honesty costs a person's life, deception is the best option. But if the situation is not serious enough to do so. Honesty is better than deception.

You can't deceive for a lifetime. When the truth comes out, you will lose the people you love forever.

Honesty and deception are antonyms. Integrity: Integrity is a moral category, the second "identity card" of citizens, and the combined name of honesty in daily behavior and credit in formal communication.

It generally refers to treating people with sincerity, honesty, credibility, promises, and so on. But it generally refers to two aspects: one is to be sincere and honest in dealing with people, respect for facts, and seek truth from facts; The second refers to keeping promises.

Honesty is a basic criterion of the core socialist values at the individual level. Deception: Deception is a Chinese word that deliberately deceives people by covering up the truth with false words and deeds under the condition of equality and information sharing between the two tenants and the merger.

Deception is also divided, good and malicious!