A few English questions ask for explanations A few English multiple choice questions, ask for expl

whom (preposition + guandai, guide to follow).

search of ; searched (search + location. Search for somewhere).

1.(c) ALEC requested that the police officers working with him contact him whenever there was an accident.

Contact with is a fixed phrase. The policeman is used as an object in the definite clause to guide with whom, with in advance, so choose c

go out doing sth.

search for is followed by people, and everywhere is the location, so.

Let's go into details. Adopt me.

whom, phrase work with

2.The first thing that is easy to judge is the second empty, and I had searched everywhere.

And in search for means to seek.

1.Choose C. The definite clause is followed by a missing object, and work is an intransitive verb, so a preposition should be added. him cannot lead a definite clause.

2.Choose A. Fixed usage, don't need to explain it in detail.

1 those invited (friend) omits friend2, to be held also indicates what is about to happen, and irregular tense means future tense, if according to you be cannot be omitted.

3, The whole tense of this sentence is in the present tense, so it is not appropriate to use the past tense. And because the latter thing happens before speaking, so use the perfect tense.

4, This sentence is clearer The tense that follows before is in the past tense, so the tense before the past tense should be in the past perfect tense. And it can't be in the simple past tense.

1 b is the past participle as a definite modifier to those who are invited, as the subject of the second sentence.

2 belongs to the infinitive as a definite and expresses the future.

3 is used in the present perfect tense because the sentence is in the simple present tense and emphasizes that the action should be completed 4 because it was forgotten at home before I realized it, and realize is done in the past.

1 Use passive (those friends who are invited).

2 Here the indefinite future tense is used, note the later time 3 is lost when speaking, and the application is complete.

4 Clauses guided by realised are generally in the past perfect tense.

.invitations are the noun form of invitations. Invited refers to the person who is invited.

Give is followed by a double object.

What is generally equated with the thing which

In this way, it will become like this: he is a newcomer i will give him the help which he needs.

Translated like this: he's a newcomer. I'll give him some help he needs.

In this case, using what is a kind of emphasis, rather than directly using the help. But not as emphasized as whatever.

help is used as a noun here.

But actually, I think B is also right......

In addition, I will tell you a little secret, what can be translated as "Dongdong" when translating! ^_

Hello; Personally, I think B is better, and it is more in line here"Expression habits in Chinese"

If you use d, it should be changed to : whatever help he needs, so it is better.

Translation: He is new here, I will give him the necessary help and hope it will be helpful to you!

I also think B is right and I will give him the help he needs. the heip (that) he needs.Determinative clause.

If the original sentence d is what, then d, i will give him what he needs, a noun clause guided by what as the direct object of give.

Hello classmates: Not all the papers or practice questions that are printed in the book are reasonable, and there will inevitably be omissions. Questioning ourselves helps to consolidate our knowledge of grammar.

What you adopt is also reasonable, and it should be: help is the object of give, he needs is missing the object, and what happens to be his object. The answer is D

a.where is the correct option.

where leads to a predicative clause meaning "this is where I disagree". You can't use d. If you use what, add with after agree. Don't forget, agree is an intransitive verb.

Good luck!

First of all, the literal translation: "I disagree with each other".

Furthermore, what is generally used as the subject, and the above is an object clause, which cannot be guided by waht.

Where in the sentence is a connecting adverb, which guides the noun clause to be the predicate, and the self is the adverbial in the clause. If the answer is what, it is asking what I disagree with, and where means which part or aspect the author disagrees with so where is more appropriate.

The vacancy is followed by a noun phrase, and the vacancy is a preposition.

Until as a preposition if it is not in a negative sentence to mean 'to......Until ......time".

And then you see, the translation doesn't work...This question A is not even a distractor at all......

The vacancy is followed by a noun phrase and the vacancy is a preposition that matches time.

until1、conj.In....Before; Until....time".

2、prep.In....Before; to....Until.

Whatever the meaning is, it's inappropriate here.

If it is not indicated in a negative sentence, "to ......Until ......time", this sentence is a declarative sentence.

So you can't choose A.

Therefore, when doing English questions, not only look at whether its semantics are appropriate, but more importantly, look at its collocation. As long as you remember to set the match, you can't go wrong with the general choice.

It means until is usually used in the present perfect tense The meaning of the sentence is that the train leaves at six o'clock so I have to be at the station at about five forty at the latest, and the last d should be chosen

Until when used as a preposition, it usually means to....So far put here became I had to rush to the station at 5:40 and by said in... Before.

In line with the topic.

In the first question, the singular and complex form of the verb looks at the subject, because food indicates the general term (emphasizing the type is also used as a plural number, and the singular number in the word), and the singular form used, choose b

In the second question, the personal pronoun is the subject, and the word order --- first the second person (you), then the first person (i, we) and then the third person, and the choice b

The third question is because students count nouns, and the use of many and few to modify the need to use the plural, that is, sthdents, and any means to add the singular form of the noun, and few means to negate, the meaning is also right, any plus singular noun explanation"Whatever", select B

1. This is a master-slave compound sentence, where ——

Main clause: whether ...needs considering whether or not it needs to be considered.

Subject clause: both of them should be employed.

2. About the usage of need.

1.When the subject is a noun that represents the ability to act, it means that the subject has the need to take the initiative to do something, and the need is directly followed by the infinitive initiative, i.e., need to do sth, the subject and the infinitive are subject-verb relations.

2.When the subject represents something that does not have the ability to act, it means that this thing needs to be done, and need can be followed by two non-predicate verb forms, namely the infinitive passive form need to be done or the gerund need doing, and the subject and the non-predicate verb are verb-object relations.

3. In this question, the subject clause represents a fact, belongs to the category of things, and it is a verb-object relationship with the non-predicate verb, so it can be expressed in two forms:

1. whether both of them should be employed needs to be considered.

2. whether both of them should be employed needs considering.

Since there is only considering of the d item in the options, the correct answer can only be the latter.

Since the landlord already knows need doing=need to be done, then you can only choose d, if you need to be considered, you can also choose.

Whether the two of them are hired or not is still something to consider.

Hope to be able to help the landlord.

Whether or not both of them will be hired needs to be considered.

a Replace option with to be considered

The first way: you think of considering as a gerund, you can. It is the nominalization of verbs.

Then whether both of them should be employed as the subject, the predicate is need, and the object is a noun (transformed from a verb). Need..

The second is what you said, understand exactly right need to be done=need doing, infinitive table passive.

Calm down, you see, putting ing on the verb be, and the verb be is simply passive, need being considered is wrong.

I think it should be a

Because A is need doing