In the natural world, why is it often the small division that wins? Such as lions against bison and

One practices every day, and the other runs every day.

A claw with sharp teeth, a fat head with a brain.

Just like people. Practicing Guoshu every day and a person who has never practiced before, even if the weight difference is doubled, most of them are still tall people who are knocked down.

Technique, **, strategy, lions and other carnivores are professional killers.

And bison == herbivores are not in technology, **, the strategy is in a slight trend.

Their survival depends on: speed and quantity.

There's no comparison.

1.No way. Because cunning is more tactful, and "cunning" or "cunning" has a derogatory connotation, which is not suitable!

2.I can't remove it. This is to set the stage for the later writing that the bison was defeated by a lion.

3.Indicates unexpected.

How is it like a language question, very annoying like this.

What is the meaning of blind arrogance after being deceived in the text?

Three seconds later, the mighty body of the attacking bison slowly fell down without the slightest struggle. The lion's bloody teeth were clenched into the throat of the bison.

What exactly is meant by "real picture" in paragraph 1 of this article? Summarize it briefly.

It means that the lion chased a little bison and was about to fall into the lion's mouth, and the escaped bison brought a large group of rescuers to drive away the lions and rescue the little bison.

The battle between the bull and lion in 8 minutes and 23 seconds completely (subverted) my definition of the strong and the weak.

Explain the meaning of the words in parentheses.

This phrase strongly expresses the battle of the bull and lion, completely overturning the general law that "I" originally thought of as the law of the jungle in nature.

Who is more powerful, the tiger or the lion?

No one has directly compared, but some laboratories have done some power comparisons between the two models: the bite force of the tiger is nearly half greater than that of the lion, and the power of the pounce tiger is not as powerful as the lion.

Lions like to hunt alone, while tigers like to act in groups, this is not easy to say, if the single should be more ferocious, but if a group of lions and a group of tigers, maybe the group cooperation of the tigers will prevail.

The lion is a little more docile than it, and the tiger is fierce, so it is the king of the forest. Thank you for adopting.

In the case of going it alone, the tiger is obviously a little stronger than the lion. This is because lions live a life of collective hunting, and their food distribution system has the problem of eating a big pot of rice, doing more and doing less, and doing and not doing the same. In addition, the lion abides by the principle of distribution of more "fishing" and more gains, who has great strength and high status, who has the right to enjoy food first, this survival relationship between lions causes the lion group to often be mixed with several Mr. Nanguo, only some lions are hunting very hard, and other lions are mostly some typical gangsters, especially those male lions who have nothing to do, and they are most interested in only fighting for power and gaining the status of leader in the lion group, and the food ** and other issues related to the rise and fall of the entire lion group, then they are simply indifferent.

The survival relationship between tigers requires them to fight independently all year round, and adult tigers cannot rely on other tigers for food, and the tiger's ability to obtain survival materials is low, and the hunting skills are not perfect, which means that it will be punished by starvation or even death. Since tigers often have to use their hunting abilities to the limit, the survival relationship between tigers has made them very good hunters. It can be argued that it is precisely the influence of the survival relationship within the entire lion population and the entire tiger population that determines that in the case of a single fight, the tiger is more likely to win.

Although it is possible for a tiger to defeat a lion and win the title of king of beasts in the case of a fair duel, such a fair duel obviously does not exist in nature.