What does it mean to popularize the law and govern according to law ? 10

The rule of law is an important symbol of human society's entry into modern civilization.

The rule of law is an important achievement of human political civilization and a basic framework of modern society. From the political system of a country to the words and deeds of individuals, they all need to operate within the framework of the rule of law. For modern China, the integrated construction of a country under the rule of law, a society under the rule of law, and a society under the rule of law is the real rule of law.

Governing the country according to law, governing according to law, and administering according to law are jointly promoted, which is the real law; Scientific legislation, strict law enforcement, a fair judiciary, and the full promotion of law-abiding by the whole people are the true rule of law. Whether it is economic or political reform, the rule of law can be described as a forerunner, and the importance of the rule of law cannot be overemphasized.

Difference Between Rule of Law and Rule of Law:

Both the rule of law and the rule of law emphasize a static legal system and the process of applying this static legal system to social life. The biggest difference between the two is that the concept of the rule of law does not contain value; The rule of law contains values and emphasizes the sovereignty of the people.

The rule of law emphasizes only the content of the formal meaning, while the rule of law emphasizes the content of both the formal meaning and the substantive meaning. The legal system focuses more on the formalization of law, emphasizing the system, procedures and operational mechanisms of the "rule of law" itself, and its focus is on the effectiveness of the law and the stability of social order.

This is precisely what the first aspect of the rule of law (the rule of law in the formal sense) requires. It can be seen from this that the rule of law is the prerequisite and foundation of the rule of law. Without the rule of law, there can be no rule of law.

On the other hand, emphasizing only the formal aspects of law does not reveal the deeper connotation of the rule of law, especially the rule of law in its substantive sense. To put it simply, "rule of law" is the abbreviation of "governance of the legal system". "Law" means "legal system"; "Governance" refers to "governance".

The essence of the rule of law in our country is -

borrowing the law to govern the people under him, the party and government ** say that you have broken the law, you are breaking the law; The party and government ** said that you haven't broken the law, then you haven't broken the law.

If the party and government say that their actions are legal, then you don't have to fight.

The rule of law is a way for the ruling class to govern the ruled class, with coercive force, so it looks very domineering.

The rule of law means the rule of law.

The rule of law regulates the people's daily behavior, ideology, and civilized spiritual customs.

The rule of law is the rule of law (but the law is also written by people) to govern the country.

The rule of law is the provision that the law is the supreme norm that binds the people of this country, not the words and deeds, morality or anything else that binds the people of this country.

In practice, the judiciary must be independent, and if the judiciary is not independent, there is no need to talk about the rule of law.

Strictly speaking, even an independent judiciary cannot be called a country governed by the rule of law. In fact, there is no 100% rule of law in the world, and in Western countries with independent justice, their judges are also human beings, and as long as they are human beings, they will have feelings, and the law should be in the realm of pure reason, not in the realm of emotion. Although there is a rule of law (for example, thieves without a background are sentenced according to law), there are too many places where people are governed, and the main manifestation can be summed up as "not punishing doctors".

As for the rule of law, what about the "law" itself, on which the rule of law rests? Who should make the law? Should those who are not involved in the making of laws accept the rule of law? (Because the law itself is written by people, and people have feelings), that's another topic.

The ruling class prescribes a series of means conducive to the continuation of its rule by the higher animals it rules.

There are two principles of the rule of law: whatever the law does not stipulate cannot be done, citizens can do! Anything that the law does not stipulate can be done, it is not allowed to be done! - Yi Zhongtian.

The rule of law is the basis on which rulers clean up people.