Should environmental protection be people centred or nature oriented?

Personally, I think that people want to live in a place with a good environment based on nature.

Environmental protection is the conscious protection of natural resources by human beings and their rational use to prevent the natural environment from being polluted and damaged; The concept of comprehensive management of the polluted and damaged environment to create an environment suitable for human life and work, to coordinate the relationship between man and nature, and to allow people to live in harmony with nature.

Prevent contamination:

Prevent environmental pollution and chemical pollution caused by production and living activities, including the prevention and control of wastewater, waste gas, waste residue, dust, radioactive materials discharged from industrial production, as well as the noise, vibration, odor and electromagnetic microwave radiation generated.

Harmful gases, liquids, and noises generated by transportation activities, pollutants discharged from marine ship transportation, toxic and harmful chemicals used in industrial and agricultural production and people's daily life, and pollution caused by soot, sewage, and garbage emitted from urban life.

Depending on your topic, it should be a debate.

The so-called nature-based argument is the opposite of "human-centered". That is, it is human selfishness to believe that human activities have destroyed nature, and people's behavior should be based on protecting and conforming to nature.

In my opinion, there is a major point of confusion in such an argument. First, "the purpose of taking nature as the foundation is still people-oriented, and the purpose of conforming to nature is still the continuation of human beings and life"; The second is that "nature is ruthless, human beings are sentient, and human beings are natural no matter what."

Therefore, we must talk about the table, not the root, the urgency, and not the delay. In the current situation, safeguard the interests of mankind and continue to develop? Or will you abandon the existing development and return to the age of barbarism?

From this point of view, it is judged by the three sides of the contradiction between the productive forces and the relations of production, the economic construction and the spiritual construction, and the harmony between human development and nature.

That is, human activities cannot exceed the earth's ability to repair itself, that is, for the sustainable development of human beings. Failure to protect nature will lead to destruction.

It's like there's a fast food and food stall near my house, and the kitchen is right in front of my door, and the fumes come to my house every day, and now my family has breathing problems! I always run to the hospital, and it is difficult to complain! Because there is a "local snake" in the local area, we are small citizens who have no choice!

You say that the environment is not people-oriented!

The Western Declaration on the Human Environment states that human beings have the capacity to achieve sustainable development. Sustainable development can realize the ideals of modern man, but it should not undermine the ability of future human beings to meet their own hopes.

This declaration marks the beginning of a new era in environmental protection in the major industrial countries of the West.

But on the other hand, China is realizing its dream of becoming rich, while repeating the mistakes of Western industrial countries in the last century, wantonly abusing and destroying the environment, and we cannot escape the bloody pollution figures. With such a heavy burden of pollution, how can we talk about development!

In the face of this situation, the state is recently issued the "Decision on Implementing the Scientific Outlook on Development and Strengthening Environmental Protection", which said that strengthening environmental protection is conducive to promoting economic restructuring and transformation of growth mode, and achieving faster and better development; It is conducive to driving the development of environmental protection and related industries, cultivating new economic growth points and increasing employment; It is conducive to improving the environmental awareness and moral quality of the whole society and promoting the construction of socialist spiritual civilization; It is conducive to ensuring the health of the people, improving the quality of life and prolonging the average life expectancy; It is conducive to safeguarding the long-term interests of the Chinese nation and leaving a good space for survival and development for future generations. Therefore, we can clearly see that environmental protection is more important than economic development.

We start with the following point of view.

1. It is people who destroy the environment, and if there is no one, the environment will not be destroyed.

2. People need the most natural resources.

3. People are consumers in the environment, not decomposers and producers.

To sum up, humans have the most damage to the natural environment. The ozone layer is destroyed precisely because humans use electrical appliances for their own comfort. If we don't do it for comfort, but for the environment, the ecosystem won't be destroyed.

Issue. 1. May I ask the opponent's defense friend, who created the hole in the earth's ozone layer?

2. May I ask the opponent's defense friend, if the protection of the surrounding rock is based on nature, then why do we human beings have to use rules and regulations to limit the pollution of the environment?