I want to buy a 4 core computer, what do you want to see?

Updated on number 2024-02-09
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    4-core AMD Athlons (5000+), cost-effective.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    CPU: AMD3440**--505: Motherboard:

    Gigabyte 770T-UD3-P**--630 Graphics: Sapphire 5750**: 585 RAM:

    2G DDR3**:123 HDD: WD500G**:

    313 Chassis: HKC--95 Power supply: IP430 --220 Keyboard ViewSonic Waterproof Case--75 AOC919SW--690

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Generally, dual-core is enough, and now the bottleneck of the computer is not in the CPU, mainly in the graphics card, memory and other components.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    For home use, an Intel i3 dual-core processor is completely sufficient.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    If it's just for casual use, just look at a web page to chat about QQ or play QQ games, etc., it is recommended that you don't buy it, it's really not necessary. If you buy it, you waste money and the performance of the machine is there, just buy a cheaper one, it's good to have enough. If you're like that, buy a big screen, buy a stereo, and the rest is free

  6. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    There is a big gap between Intel's products and AMD's products. You come on your own budget.

    Whether it's home or playing games, Intel is now more recommended, and the performance is there

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Large-scale games and CAD processing, as well as plane drawing, choose high-frequency dual-core (2800MHz or more), require rendering tasks such as 3D Max, and a large number of data analysis and calculation, and medium-level 4-core is better. (e.g., 2920xm).

    PS Because 2D acceleration and game optimization rarely have 4 cores, dual-core high frequency has an advantage and is satisfied.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Quad-core is faster than dual-core. You can only compare how many cores with the same brand, and there is no comparison between different brands, just like AMD quad-core is not as good as inter dual-core, but the quad-core of the same brand is definitely better than dual-core.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    You can't just look at the number of cores, but also look at the architecture, frequency, etc., 760K quad-core is not as greasy as i3 dual-core.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Quad-core has the advantage of multitasking, and dual-core is suitable for a few tasks or single-core has strong performance.

Related questions
26 answers2024-02-09

D-link, tp-link, cost-effective 100 yuan. The sale is very good, and Tengda's is also OK, cheap! The quality is not very good. >>>More

23 answers2024-02-09

This mobile phone can only use one telecom card, there is a card slot, and it can be used in China. >>>More

15 answers2024-02-09

That's Samsung Note 2, it's a domineering inch screen, first-class configuration, but the hand is too small, and it is estimated that there are only two hands to operate the text message. The Apple 4S can still be started. The Samsung S3 is also a good choice, the leader of large-screen mobile phones, and the 4-core gaming game is very good.

26 answers2024-02-09

What brand of your original memory is?,Buy another memory to be the same as your original memory brand, if the original no memory.。 >>>More

7 answers2024-02-09

Just the butterfly dog, the purebred butterfly is at least 5000, if you don't have that much money, just the Pekingese dog, it's quite cute and not expensive.