The topic of the debate competition Singers can play the emotional card when they sing is a debate

The argument between reason and emotion Of course, singing must have feelings, but rationality is also very important Feelings out of control give people a feeling of pressure and ** The point of contention is 1, you can sing completely with your own feelings 2, abide by the artistic conception of the song, you can't bring your own feelings If the meaning of the debate question is to say that you play the emotional card in the singing competition, that is 1, in the singing competition, you can use feelings to supplement the lack of technology or play the emotional card to bring forth the new, play the emotional card to win the position. 2. In the singing competition, you must abide by the rules and skills of singing, and you must prove yourself with your strength This is also a debate between innovation or being smart and being conservative or abiding by the rules.

The above represents personal understanding, and the words of the family are smiling and generous.

I'm really speechless downstairs. Please take a closer look at the landlord's question first. The question is whether to play the [emotion card].

The landlord, you didn't make the topic clear, others asked you to say that it was a positive argument, according to the normal logical point of view, you should be "to play the emotional card".

From this point of view, your logical thinking ability still has great potential. Let's teach you a little bit by hand. A few ideas:

From the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation, people are emotional animals, say your question: "Hello chairman, good judges on the scene, good students off the field." In my opinion, singers can play the emotional card when they sing, no, there are too many things to say.

Pay attention to a few points: 1, be sure to find more information, be well prepared, 2, don't be nervous on the field, 3, it's nothing if you lose, it's all experience.

Positive: Integrate personal feelings into the song, if you are sad, you can show sadness, if you are a little emotional, if you are happy, you can be happy, so that everyone can participate in this happy atmosphere.

Defense: Around the fact that you shouldn't put the emotional card inside, you are singing a song, as long as you sing the sound quality well, nothing else.

It needs to start, that is, the beginning. After the debate begins, we should first state our views for three minutes, and we must memorize the manuscript, in fact, a debate is the best one to prepare...

Quality management is based on penalties and is well-founded. First of all, according to the International Organization for Standardization, quality management refers to the management activities such as organization, planning, execution and control taken to provide products that meet the requirements. In this process, the object of management is people.

According to behaviorist conditioning theory, punishment can reduce the occurrence of behavior, which has been proven, such as Watson's S-R model, Pavlov's classical conditioning theory, Skinner's operant conditioning theory, etc. Of course, in addition to punishment, incentives can also have rewards. For adult actors, punishment is more deterrent than reward, for example, the enforcement of the law, which has not been achieved through rewards.

Quality management provides people with some operational requirements, which are like legal provisions, which need to be complied with, and if they can be related to their own interests, the effect is often the best. Of course, while punishing, you also need certain skills to do a good job.

The first debate is mainly to make arguments and fully expound your views. It is desirable that the scope of the argument should be broad. Summarize the attack and defense, point out the loopholes of the other party in a certain meaning link, briefly state our point of view, and emphasize it.

The four arguments are to further consolidate one's own viewpoint and point out the loopholes of the other side. The language of the summary argument should be beautiful.

In fact, a debate competition is a building, and a debate is the cornerstone. The second and third arguments are the main part of the house. The conclusion of the first argument is to further consolidate this architectural framework. The fourth argument is to decorate the building.

First Debate: Argument. Submission.

Second debate: grasp the loopholes on the other side, argue your own point of view, debate, free debate three debates: cross-examination, summary, free debate (2, 3 debates are the main force) four debates: summarize the argument and turn the tide.

The upstairs was very good.

It's a long run. Support.

If you argue for the first time, you don't need anything else, the key is to be ruthless and steady, to have a very stable argument, to erect your own arguments well, systematically, and firmly, and to grasp the definitions and basic attributes of relevant terms. To put it bluntly, he must not be biased, and he must be even-footed, which is also the cornerstone of the team's victory. On this basis, if it can be well matched.

The second and third debates do a good job of summarizing the attack and defense, and have the ability to play on the spot, which is very good.

as the debate competition's first debater...

as the debate competition's best debater...

You're here"First"Is it the first or the most powerful one?