Which one is stronger, India and Brazil

Economically, Brazil is stronger, militarily India is stronger.

India is stronger, India has a population advantage, it is still an ancient civilization, and its comprehensive strength is stronger than Brazil. Brazil was only independent from a colony, and its resources were richer than India's.

India, because although it belongs to the third world, but India has the best research and development, as well as crude production capacity, compared with Brazil, whether it is the best research and development or existing equipment, there is no Indian cash, and Brazil's military research and development of water products I personally think is not as good as Iran.

Brazil, because of the geography and minerals of Brazil determine all this.

India is strong. Russian-American equipment, the commander of the Indian Ocean.

On the surface, India is strong, but Brazil has a lot of potential. And India's social contradictions are too deep-rooted.

India's agricultural productivity is not as good as Brazil's, but its population is much larger.

Brazil's energy industry, light industry, is mature and well-established, but India mainly relies on cheap loans and low tariffs from the British Commonwealth to maintain its industry.

India itself has nothing to offer except programmers, migrant workers and copycat pharmaceuticals.

India's caste conflicts, religious conflicts, tribal conflicts, and conflicts between big landlords and **** are all obstacles that are difficult to reverse.

Brazil, on the other hand, does not have these serious problems.

First of all, to become a world power, we must meet the three conditions of being a world power, and it is not something that can be achieved casually. The first condition is the land and population; second, a strong economic influence in the world; Third, strong military and political influence.

Although India and Brazil meet the land area and population conditions, howeverAt the moment their economic conditions are average, so now their influence in the world is not very largeAt present, the United States, China, Russia, Western Europe and other countries meet the characteristics of the above big countries, so they are in a leading position in the world and have a great influence on the world.

First of all, Brazil is a country that has economic crises from time to time, and the domestic debt crisis is particularly serious, and the state has not formed a specific and effective control and plan for this, and Brazil is too dependent on natural resources, and the country's investment in science and technology, industry and other aspects is obviously insufficient, which is simply not enough to support Brazil to become a world power.

As for India, we have to admit that India's economic development is indeed very fast, butThe foundation of India's development is not solid, and its industrial development is basically at the bottom of the entire world industrial chain, so the influence of the whole on the world is very low. As far as India's military strength is concerned, although the number of Indian troops is very large and the overall military expenditure is relatively sufficient, in essence, India's military combat effectiveness is still very weak.

In general, it isIndia and Brazil still have a long way to go if they want to develop into world powersWe must not be in a hurry, we must take every step in a steady and down-to-earth manner, and one day we will gain a firm foothold in the international arena and become a big country in the true sense of the word.

The influence of the country needs to look at the comprehensive national strength of the country! Comprehensive national strength is the most important indicator to measure a country's basic national conditions and basic resources, and it is also a comprehensive index to measure a country's economic, political, military, cultural, scientific and technological, educational, and human resources.

The reason why they don't have much influence is because their politics are not very strong.

The economic and international influence of these large countries is not yet good.

They have a lot of problems to solve, so they don't have that much influence in the international arena.

India and Brazil have a large land area and a large population, but there is still a big gap between India and China in terms of economic development level.

China is now the world's second largest economy. India has developed rapidly in recent years, and Brazil has also made great efforts with the hosting of the World Cup and the Olympic Games.

India and Brazil are very average in national strength, and their economic strength is not good.

There is no strong military influence.

Their international influence is great, especially in India.

One word poor. Two words no money.

I haven't heard of it, now money is the master, but our life, but our small family, and even the big family of the whole country are the same, the whole world is looking at the time of the rich, the Americans are too experienced, but also shows that only the country's strong financial resources are enough, in order to affect your world more, other people's heaven and earth, China is in the world, he is because of the rise of a dragon in the East.

China should be second-in-command.

Stronger than Brazil and India.

Military strength does not only refer to the number of equipment and military strike capability. It is not possible to get an accurate result by simply comparing the number of ** equipment, for example, India has 30 Su-30MKIs, and China has 20 J-10Bs. Many people will habitually compare data on paper, and think of war as a simple addition, subtraction, multiplication and division.

But in fact, the operation of a war machine is extremely complex, and simply comparing data is tantamount to seeking fish from a tree.

China has a stronger military than Brazil and India.

In fact, it can be summarized in three aspects.

The first is the completeness of industrial construction and the completeness of the industrial chain. From air and space to sea, land and air, it can be independently developed, although it needs to be strengthened in high-tech fields. But in the ranks of developing countries, China is undoubtedly the strongest.

The second is infrastructure capacity, war mobilization potential and national cohesion. For China, if the country makes a decision to build a 3,000-meter airstrip on the border with India tomorrow, the runway will rise in a few days. Referring to the reclamation of islands in the South China Sea, China undoubtedly has a strong advantage in infrastructure.

Many people will misunderstand that the fast repair must be a tofu slag project. In fact, the reason why infrastructure construction is speeding up now is largely due to technological progress, and many things can be built modularly, without the need for people to build bricks and plaster cement one by one. When it comes to war mobilization potential and national cohesion, Brazil and India are even more incomparable.

China has been a civilized country since ancient times, and the form of the whole country is built on the basis of a civilization. And what about Brazil and India? The official language of Brazil is Portuguese, and the official language of India is English.

What's the difference? In fact, it is a simple national identity. The majority of Chinese (excluding the Cent Belt and Road Party, etc.) have a strong identification with their country and civilized ethnic groups.

The third is simpler. Brazil and India have no money!

Today's world is a super-multipolar pattern, but not all powerful countries can be called superpowers. The overall economies of Brazil and India are not as bad as those of the United States, but they are not bad. The reason why Brazil and India, as big powers, have not been able to achieve strong influence in the world is that both countries have obvious shortcomings in development.

The level of development that affects a country depends not only on its economic development and the strength of its comprehensive national strength. What is more important is whether the country has a say in international influence and diplomacy.

First of all, India's biggest influence may be its population, as the second largest country in the world, the economy is growing very rapidly, but this does not allow India to gain more attention and more influence. Because in India, its economic and industrial structure is very unreasonable, and India is still generally poor, and the standard of living is not high。And India does not have a very strong voice in diplomacy, so it does not have a lot of influence in the international community.

Brazil's national strength and economic development are relatively good. But much of Brazil's development depends on its abundant natural resources. But resources are limitedIf Brazil had been relying on its limited resources to sustain its national development, it would not only be impossible to gain greater influence, but also to receive widespread international attention, and even the country's economic development would be difficult.

The main thing is economic power, military power is not big enough, in order to gain the right to speak in the world, we need corresponding economic power, military power. Otherwise, just step aside.

A large land area does not mean that the economy is strong, and the economy does not mean that the country is strong. A strong country must not only be strong economically, but also strong in military and scientific and technological strength, so that it will not be at the mercy of others.

The overall strength of these countries is still too weak, and the sense of presence is not strong.

The comprehensive national strength of India and Brazil is not very good, and how much influence does it have on the world.

The influence in the world cannot be judged only by the size of the territory, but also by the overall strength, such as the economy, military, and other fields. Most European countries are small in size, and their influence is greater than that of India and Brazil, and this is why.

Big countries such as India and Brazil just have a large land area and their overall strength is not very strong.

Because they are not as strong politically and economically as we are.

Brazil has a territory of more than 8.5 million square kilometers and a population of 100 million, it is three times the size of India, and it is also rich in natural resourcesBrazil's congenital conditions are very good, but they do not make good use of their own resources, they do not have good technology in the development of local industries, and they are all imported from abroad, so that their economy is easily controlled by foreign enterprisesThe economy is the foundation of a country, so they can't become a world power.

Brazil has a large territory and a large population, but their international influence is not very good, and their territory is three times that of IndiaHowever, 80% of the land is a plateau, and the plateau in Brazil is basically a no-man's land, so although the land area is large, the area of territory that can really be used is actually less than 1 3 of IndiaThe reason why Brazil cannot become a world power is another important reason, that is, their country's economy is not good, and the economic development is too slow, so it cannot play a role in the world economy, has no influence, and has no sense of existence.

There is Brazil, although the area is large, butitThe geographical location is not very good, and in front of it is the United States, which is so developed and a superpower that directly covers the edge of Brazil, and the United States does not allow countries with greater influence than him on its side, so no matter how powerful Brazil is, it is still very weak in front of the United States, and standing with the United States, he seems to have no sense of existence.

So thoughBrazil has the fifth-largest territory in the world, and the total population is also the fifth largest in the world, after China, India, the United States and Indonesia, but they still cannot become a world power.

When I visited Brazil in 2012, my first instinctive impression was that society was extremely inefficient. How is it a low method? For example, when I go to the bakery to buy coffee, counting the three of me, it takes 15 minutes to order, and the clerk is very slow to ask or find money, and the other two colleagues, an American and a German, feel that the slowness is unbearable, and this phenomenon appears in almost all economic situations.

The second reason is that society as a whole is not enterprising, or at best very contented with the status quo and poor. Their general opinion is that you see, although we don't have a lot of money, we have the best beach, the most comfortable weather, the hottest horses, why do we have to work hard, we are very happy. The third reason is that the huge gap between the rich and the poor is difficult to bridge, Brazil's slums are completely outside the law, the children of the slums lack education and the means to change classes, and many people have taken the road of crime under the influence of the general environment, which in turn seriously drags down the overall development of the whole society.

I always remember the statue of Jesus in Rio, the place where the statue is facing is the beach, it is *** ping, it is a golf course, it is the rich area of Rio, and behind him, there are slums... Where God has forsaken ...

It does not mean that if you have a large territory and a small population, you will be able to become a world power. Whether or not it can become a strong country is mainly related to its development policy and development capacity. For example, Canada has a larger territory and less population, and its ability to develop its economy is not very strong.

That's different, people have a lot of land in Brazil. But the Amazon rainforest alone occupies a large position, and the technology is not developed, and the population is not as large as in India.

Because Brazil was a former colony, and the industrial base was relatively weak, the technological development was not enough.

If the country is strong or not, the United States will rank first in terms of the area of territory bought.

Brazil's territory is India's sorrow, Yingkou billions of hunger can't become a world power, Brazil's territory is not India's 300 pounds and 100 million can't become the world, think I because of the babbling Oh, although I said, if the area is wide in the future, but is this a world power? Isn't it the area and Yang Shou agreed to give me the time first, mainly the economy and military, and the influence of these two aspects will also be ten big? So Luoyang is a lot, isn't she a world power?

He has to think and the economy is average, so he can't actually think about my mother. Hmmm,

The so-called strong country is mainly advanced, the country is rich, and the economy can become a strong country if it is well developed.