Someone deliberately built a wall with bricks in front of my house, what should I do, which law can

You can complain to the construction department and request the demolition of the building or structure because of its violation of regulations; If you think about it from the perspective of civil disputes, then you can file a lawsuit in court to request a lawsuit for the infringement of your right of way by its construction, etc., and you can consult a local lawyer for a litigation plan.

Is it much? If you can build a house, you will not make money.

If you are tough enough, he will not dare, if you are not tough enough, it will not be good to find anyone, because he will think of other ways.

How to say it, it is recommended to find a way to reconcile, after all, the neighbor, look up and don't see the one who looks down, and who the fuck doesn't want to go out and see the neighbor in the same mood as stepping on shit.

Hello. The other party's behavior violates your right of way, and the right of way is a neighboring right, and you can request the other party to remove the obstruction (i.e., tear down the wall) and compensate for the damage based on the infringement of the adjacent right.

First of all, you have to see if you have violated the law, if not, you can call the police when you encounter this matter, and chase the law to protect your rights and interests, you can check the relevant legal knowledge or it is best to go to a law firm to consult a lawyer.

Whether your real estate certificate divides this land is your family land, if it is localized, you can go to the local land bureau to explain the situation, if it is your home land, it can be used as a reason for lighting. It is better to reconcile, because it is taken into account that neighbors get along with each other. Hope it helps. Hope.

Summary. Dear, glad to answer for you! If someone else builds a wall in front of my house, it is against the property law.

According to Article 35 of the Property Law, "where the property right is obstructed or may be obstructed, the right holder may request that the obstruction be removed or the danger eliminated." and Article 89 stipulates that "the construction of buildings shall not violate the relevant national engineering construction standards and obstruct the ventilation, lighting and sunshine of adjacent buildings", and if the other party builds a wall on the land where your house has the right to use or affects the normal passage of your home, it may be required to be demolished.

Dear, glad to answer for you! If someone sells a hole and builds a wall in front of my house, it violates the property law. According to Article 35 of the Property Law, "where the property right is obstructed or may be obstructed, the right holder may request that the obstruction be removed or the danger eliminated."

and Article 89 stipulates that "the construction of buildings shall not violate the relevant engineering construction standards of the country's unique homes and obstruct the ventilation, lighting and sunshine of adjacent buildings", if the other party builds a wall on the land where your family has the right to use it or affects the normal passage of your home, it can be required to be demolished.

Extended information: It is illegal to build a shadow wall with rock walls in front of your own house, and it is not within the size of your own real estate certificate, which is a violation of the reputation of the royal seal building, and it is illegal for the state to allow it. Because the law is an important way to maintain social order, when the moral strength of the retreat to maintain social order is insufficient, it needs to be solved by legal means.

Extended information: It is illegal to build a shadow wall with rock walls in front of your own house, and it is not within the size of your own real estate certificate, which is a violation of the reputation of the royal seal building, and it is illegal for the state to allow it. Because the law is an important way to maintain social order, when the moral strength of the retreat to maintain social order is insufficient, it needs to be solved by legal means.

In this case, which one of the neighbors has violated the law, and how can I protect my legal right to use it?

Dear, it's the property law that violates the law.

Dear relatives, you can protect your rights and interests through litigation or going to the relevant departments.

Oh, thank you.

Hello dear, here are mine. The adjacent rights holders of immovable property shall correctly handle the adjacent relationship in accordance with the principles of conducive to production, convenient life, solidarity and mutual assistance, fairness and reasonableness. Where obstructions or losses are caused to neighboring parties, the infringement shall be stopped, the obstruction removed, and the losses compensated.

Therefore, the adjacent relationship is that the owners or users of immovable property adjacent to each other should respect the rights of the owners or users of the other party when they exercise their legitimate rights and interests, and they should give certain convenience or accept certain restrictions on each other. Legal basis: Part 2 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Article 288 of Property Rights [Principles for Handling Adjacent Relationships] The adjacent rights holders of immovable property shall correctly handle adjacent relationships in accordance with the principles of conducive to production, convenient life, solidarity and mutual assistance, fairness and reasonableness.

Others blocking the door of the house violated the provisions of the Civil Code, and it is suspected of intentionally obstructing the life of others and affecting the travel of others, which is a tortious act. The infringed party has the right to request the infringer to bear tort liabilities such as stopping the infringement, removing obstacles, and eliminating dangers.

Article 1165 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Where an actor infringes upon the civil rights and interests of others due to fault and causes harm, he shall bear tort liability. In accordance with the provisions of the law, it is presumed that the person is at fault, and if he cannot prove that he is not at fault, he shall bear tort liability. Article 1166 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Where an actor causes harm to the civil rights and interests of others, regardless of whether the actor is at fault, and the law provides that tort liability shall be borne, follow those provisions.

Article 1167 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Where the tortious act endangers the safety of the person or property of others, the infringed party has the right to request the infringer to bear tortious liability such as stopping the infringement, removing obstacles, and eliminating dangers.

If there are no serious consequences, I think Article 9 of the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law" applies to the violation of the administration of public security, such as fighting or damaging other people's property caused by civil disputes, and the circumstances are relatively minor, the public security organs may mediate and deal with it. Where the public security organs mediate and the parties reach an agreement, punishment is not to be given. Where no agreement is reached through mediation or no performance is made after an agreement is reached, the public security organs shall punish the violators of the administration of public security in accordance with the provisions of this Law, and inform the parties that they may lawfully initiate a civil lawsuit in the people's court regarding the civil dispute.

The parties shall promptly report to the police, pay attention to mediation between neighbors, find out the root cause of the incident, and strive to achieve mutual understanding between the two parties.

Report the case to the local police station.

You should first look at the relevant documents of your house, if the door you open is legal, then the other party is violating your right of way.

It turned out that there was no, but now if the other party's behavior causes inconvenience to others' daily life, it must be an illegal act!

If you have violated the neighboring rights, you should be able to win the case if you sue the court on the grounds of the neighboring rights.

The right of adjacency between residents was violated.

Solution: First, you can negotiate with the other party, explain the impact of wall tiles on you, if you do not demolish the means that will be taken, second, you can report illegal buildings to the Urban Management and Planning Bureau, that is, to report to the urban management, when reporting more serious, and said that it was consulted by a lawyer, this is an illegal building, if not dealt with in time, it will go to the administrative reconsideration.

Third, it is to go to the court to sue, this is the last resort, it doesn't matter if you don't know how to write a complaint, there is a case filing hall in the court, you go to explain the situation, and file a case, tell the case filer that your family's financial situation is not good and do not know the legal related procedures, and you want to apply for legal assistance, the court will recommend a public interest lawyer who understands the law for you, and they do not charge a fee.